MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose) |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
===Removal of Opposes=== | ===Removal of Opposes=== | ||
{{User|MeritC}} | |||
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} Exactly what about it is unacceptable? You say that the article isn't good layout-wise, but what about it isn't good? You haven't given any details excluding an incredibly vague "it doesn't look acceptable", and because you do not specify as to what about the article makes it unworthy of being featured, your vote is not valid. | |||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Revision as of 13:10, March 16, 2013
Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour
Support
- Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Detailed, etc. I removed the picture template, as it has plenty of pictures.
Oppose
- MeritC (talk) It's okay so far, but layout wise, it doesn't look acceptable enough for featured territory. In fact, I'll see about contacting proper parties to see about trying to make some sections better. But for now, in this case and state, I say no.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) This article is missing character statistics, which is needed because it's vital information. Per MeritC as well. I don't like the list layout at all. It doesn't look nice.
- GreenDisaster (talk) Per MertitC, BLOF, and anyone that posts after me that has good reasoning.
- SmartYoshi (talk) Per MeritC and BLOF.
- King Pikante (talk) Per MeritC and BLOF.
Removal of Opposes
- GreenDisaster (talk) Exactly what about it is unacceptable? You say that the article isn't good layout-wise, but what about it isn't good? You haven't given any details excluding an incredibly vague "it doesn't look acceptable", and because you do not specify as to what about the article makes it unworthy of being featured, your vote is not valid.
