MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Tennis (Nintendo 64): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (This was supposed to happen a long time ago.) |
m (L151 moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N/Mario Tennis (Nintendo 64) to MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Tennis (Nintendo 64) without leaving a redirect) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 22:54, March 12, 2013
Mario Tennis (Nintendo 64)
Template:Fa-archive Mario Tennis (Nintendo 64) became unfeatured at 22:42, 4 May 2012
Remove Featured Article Status
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) This article needs an overall clean up. The grammar is nonstandard for most of the article, which I think it's a big no-no. One the gripes I have with this article is that most of the images provided here are TINY! They're around 120 × 90, which is basically the size of a large sprite. I'm tagging these images with the {{image-quality}} template. A featured article doesn't contain so much images that need to be uploaded in a better quality. There is some information that needs to be added as well, such as each character's set partner in the doubles tournament. I think this article needs serious work because it lacks details, which means it doesn't cover as much as possible; the writing is bad, and the images seriously need to be in better quality. Compared to the Mario Power Tennis article, this one is poor quality. I added the blue template, by the way. This article needs a cleanup notice template, but we don't have one.
- MarioSmasher (talk) A featured article with a load of small images, most likely with the size of a large sprite? NO.
- Commander Code-8 (talk) A lot of these images definetly need to be reuploaded
- GalacticPetey (talk) Someone get a good uploader for this article.
- MeritC (talk) I'm going to have to agree that this needs to get unfeatured for the time being. Not to mention that I'm seeing red links; and the FA requriements are that there shouldn't be a lot of red links on an article the reader is viewing. Plus, the layout on some sections are a bit ugly.
Keep Featured Article Status
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
Way too many of the images in this article are this:
This is the full resolution. LeftyGreenMario (talk)