MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Paper Mario: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== {{UNFANOMSTAT |nominated=~~~~~ |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth supp...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} I am nominating this for unfeaturing for the exact same reason that [[Count Bleck]], [[Dimentio]], and others have either been unfeatured or in the process of being unfeatured: it's not written like an article. This is a recurring problem with quite a few of the Super Paper Mario articles, and it is a problem that's a worthy reason for unfeaturing an article. Besides the overly flowery story, the rest of the article has its own problems, such as the "Similarities to Previous Paper Mario Games" that really stretches for some examples ("Bowser is fought in all three Paper Mario games" isn't that notable when this is the ''Mario'' series we're talking about), the lack of mention of recipes (not even a link to the ''SPM'' recipe article), the really awkward table for the Pixls (the colors look weird, the text looks tiny, the table has its own outline for some reason...) the lack of information for the Pit of 100 Trials (if I'm a new user who hasn't played a ''Paper Mario'' game before, I'm not going to know what it is), and I can just go on and on. | #{{User|GreenDisaster}} I am nominating this for unfeaturing for the exact same reason that [[Count Bleck]], [[Dimentio]], and others have either been unfeatured or in the process of being unfeatured: it's not written like an article. This is a recurring problem with quite a few of the Super Paper Mario articles, and it is a problem that's a worthy reason for unfeaturing an article. Besides the overly flowery story, the rest of the article has its own problems, such as the "Similarities to Previous Paper Mario Games" that really stretches for some examples ("Bowser is fought in all three Paper Mario games" isn't that notable when this is the ''Mario'' series we're talking about), the lack of mention of recipes (not even a link to the ''SPM'' recipe article), the really awkward table for the Pixls (the colors look weird, the text looks tiny, the table has its own outline for some reason...) the lack of information for the Pit of 100 Trials (if I'm a new user who hasn't played a ''Paper Mario'' game before, I'm not going to know what it is), and I can just go on and on. | ||
#{{User|ThePremiumYoshi}} - Per GreenDisaster. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Revision as of 12:47, February 17, 2013
Super Paper Mario
Remove Featured Article Status
- GreenDisaster (talk) I am nominating this for unfeaturing for the exact same reason that Count Bleck, Dimentio, and others have either been unfeatured or in the process of being unfeatured: it's not written like an article. This is a recurring problem with quite a few of the Super Paper Mario articles, and it is a problem that's a worthy reason for unfeaturing an article. Besides the overly flowery story, the rest of the article has its own problems, such as the "Similarities to Previous Paper Mario Games" that really stretches for some examples ("Bowser is fought in all three Paper Mario games" isn't that notable when this is the Mario series we're talking about), the lack of mention of recipes (not even a link to the SPM recipe article), the really awkward table for the Pixls (the colors look weird, the text looks tiny, the table has its own outline for some reason...) the lack of information for the Pit of 100 Trials (if I'm a new user who hasn't played a Paper Mario game before, I'm not going to know what it is), and I can just go on and on.
- ThePremiumYoshi (talk) - Per GreenDisaster.
