MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Hoops 3-on-3: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(archiving)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=14:56, 14 October 2012
|nominated=14:56, 14 October 2012
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=14:41, 13 December 2012
|nosupport=true
}}
}}


Line 12: Line 13:
#{{User|Mariobros1985}}
#{{User|Mariobros1985}}
#{{User|Lucoshi}}
#{{User|Lucoshi}}
#{{User|Daisyluva99}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====

Revision as of 01:20, January 1, 2013

Mario Hoops 3-on-3


Support

  1. Yoshi K (talk) I was looking for articles that deserved to be FAs, so I looked at this article and said, "Wow." This article is very well-written, has no improvement tags, has a good lead, no red-links (the red stuff in the article is coloring), has a lot of info about the game, and has many good-quality images. I double-checked it for mistakes, and I still can't find anything wrong with it! I think this should be featured.
  2. World10 (talk)
  3. SmartYoshi (talk)
  4. Mariobros1985 (talk)
  5. Lucoshi (talk)

Oppose

  1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Needs better quality pictures and more pictures overall.
  2. Vommack (talk) Per all.
  3. DKPetey99 (talk) Per my comments below.

Removal of Opposes

Comments

I agree more images should be added. Also, I feel the items list is unorganized. Most games have a chart for images, and I think this one needs one, too. The character chart is also iffy, as the centering is off. I do agree that the information is extraordinary, however it's physical quality seems messy or not good enough. I'll see what I can do regarding changing the appearance. But for now I'm opposing. DKPetey99DKPetey99TCE