Talk:Fortress

Merge with Tower

Template:SettledTPP DON'T MERGE 1-6

I think that Tower and Fortress articles should be merged. They both serve the same purpose and the names are interchangeable. For example, in New Super Mario Bros. U they are called towers but look like fortresses.

Proposer: BluePiranha (talk)
Deadline: December 20, 2012, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. BluePiranha (talk) Per my proposal.

Oppose

1. Marshal Dan Troop (talk) No because they aren't the same a tower is not a fortress so they shouldn't be merged together even if they often play the same role.
2. Coooool123 (talk) As much as I'm for merging articles, I'm going to have to disagree on this one. Fortresses are the things at the end of each level. Towers are the things that the koopalings are in.
3. 1337star (talk) So, after some thought and seeing how the articles have been re-arranged, I now disagree to a merge. Towers essentially replaced fortresses, yes, but that doesn't automatically make the fortresses of SMB3 and SMW suddenly towers now as well. That would be like saying Shellcreepers are Koopa Troopas because the latter replaced the former as turtle-like enemies for Mario.
4. BowserJunior (talk) per 1337star.
5. DonnyKD (talk) per 1337star.
6. YoshiCookie (talk) Tsk, tsk, tsk. The Towers (yes, NSMBW counts) look more, well, tower-like, so to speak. The fortresses resemble real-life forts actually. Besides, the towers are vertical and hardly have any enemies at all (besides a few Dry Bones here and there) and the main obstacles are moving platforms. Fortresses are filled will enemies and are puzzle-oriented (especially in SMB3). Although they have the same music, and still act as mini-boss levels (even featuring the guys from the Fortresses in SMB3 and SMW, respectively, in NSMB2 and NSMBU), they have, overall, a different look and feel to them.

Comments

Coooool123, read the fortress article. There are two types of fortresses. The ones at the end of levels and the ones that function like towers. BluePiranha (talk)

They're still two different things. Coooool123 (talk)

Actually, why don't we just move over the NSMB info to the tower page instead of merging? NSMB's fortresses may be towers, but the SMB3, SMW, and end of level fortresses are not. DonnyKD (talk) 16:03, 6 December 2012 (EST)

I would personally vastly prefer the information on the end of level fortresses to be removed, regardless of whether this proposal passes. Covering them starts to seep into violating MarioWiki:Generic subjects. As for pre-NSMB fortress levels, how are they different, than, say the towers of NSMBU? -- 1337star ^{(Mailbox SP)} 16:24, 6 December 2012 (EST)

Well, for starters, every fortress in SMW is not vertical, unlike NSMBU's towers. And in SMW, fortresses are infrequent and are generally harder than the castles. While SMB3's fortresses don't share the latter's benefit, it does have the former. DonnyKD (talk) 16:27, 6 December 2012 (EST)

I've noticed that our policy for things like this seems to be that if it has different characteristics, it's different. Towers are vertically scrolling. Fortresses, however, are sidescrolling. Seems like a big difference to me.-BowserJunior (talk) 23:25, 6 December 2012 (EST)

Well, I guess it's fine now. But if the fortresses in New Super Mario Bros. Wii are actually towers, then the NSMBW tower icon should link to the tower page instead. And it shouldn't be used to represent fortresses on the SMB3 pages. BluePiranha (talk) 04:37, 8 December 2012 (EST)

Man…This is getting complicated. Because then we'd have to create a new fortress icon…This is just getting bigger and bigger.-BowserJunior (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2012 (EST)

• No, not really. The SMW fortress icon can be the Fortress symbol, and the one NSMBW uses is the tower symbol. DonnyKD (talk) 23:12, 10 December 2012 (EST)