Talk:Giga-carrot: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 17:56, 20 September 2012 (EDT) | :{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 17:56, 20 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
::There was a point in time where every single short article was treated as a stub. Stubs were treated as horrible things that needed to be removed. They were most often removed not by expanding the article, but by merging or deleting it. By the way, I'm all for splitting Giga Carrot. [[User:GreenDisaster|GreenDisaster]] ([[User talk:GreenDisaster|talk]]) 17:59, 20 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:59, September 20, 2012
Question
Why was this redirected to Carrot? Yes it was a short article but it wasn't a stub because there is so little info about it. And yes it is in fact a carrot but it is a giant carrot with an official name much like Grand Goomba so i'm asking is there any reason that these two articles are merged. Raven Effect (talk)
- Perhaps a user saw sense in merging it into an article that covered all Carrots. But we don't have Grand Goomba merged with Goomba, and like you said, it was an official name and an article of decent length. Wanna split it back?
Shokora (talk · edits) 17:56, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
- There was a point in time where every single short article was treated as a stub. Stubs were treated as horrible things that needed to be removed. They were most often removed not by expanding the article, but by merging or deleting it. By the way, I'm all for splitting Giga Carrot. GreenDisaster (talk) 17:59, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
