Talk:Bone Piranha Plant: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:21, August 7, 2012

Should this enemy be called "Bone Piranha"? Marioguy200 (talk) 13:36, 31 July 2012 (EDT)

I think so too.

The official name will/may come in the Prima Guide once the game is release in America, so it best just the name leave for now. L 151

I believe it should be called "Dry Piranha Plant".

See the TPP below.--Knife (talk) 17:31, 5 August 2012 (EDT)

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Thursday, November 28, 2024, 17:16 GMT

I think this should be moved to Skeletal Piranha Plant. After all, Undead Goomba will probably be moved to Skull Goomba.

Proposer: Electrical Bowser jr. (talk)
Deadline: August 19, 2012, 23:59 GMT

YoshiGo99 (talk) These are actually undead ones unlike the Skull Goombas. And I would wait on the Prima Guide for this enemy's name.
Lakituthequick (talk) Per YG99. Also what Master R.O.B said below.
Master R.O.B (talk) They aren't like Undead Goombas, they're actually undead. Per YoshiGo.
Walkazo (talk) - I'm opposing for the same reason as the "Undead Goomba" TPP: it's pointless to move the page from one perfectly adequate conjectural title to another just-as-speculative name when we're only a couple months away from getting an actual title, at most. Don't get bent out of shape over placeholders: both these TPPs are more trouble than they're worth.
Vommack (talk) Per Yoshi/Walkazo.
Prince Ludwig (talk) Can you stop making useless polls? We should wait for the official name of the Undead Piranha Plant than making another fan-created name. It's just a waste of time. Sorry, if I sound like I'm backseat moderating.
MarioSmasher (talk) — 1. Wait for an official source 2. Don't move to a name that doesn't match the appearance of the article's subject 3. Move to official name when official source is available. Per YoshiGo99.

Please set up you TPP's properly next time. Lakituthequick 14:58, 5 August 2012 (EDT)

OKAY, guys! If you need anyone to insult, go visit my page!

Aaaand this is relevant how, exactly?--Vommack (talk) 08:16, 7 August 2012 (EDT)

Because everyone seems to be doing it!

What're you talking about?--Vommack (talk) 08:25, 7 August 2012 (EDT)

He's just gone mad. We aren't gonna "attack" him. We didn't insult you. We are against the idea.--Prince Ludwig (talk) 15:20, 7 August 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:20, August 7, 2012 (edit) Prince Ludwig (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Comments) ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:21, August 7, 2012 (edit) (undo) Prince Ludwig (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Comments) Newer edit →
Line 45:		Line 45:
	What're you talking about?--[[User:Vommack\|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack\|talk]]) 08:25, 7 August 2012 (EDT)		What're you talking about?--[[User:Vommack\|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack\|talk]]) 08:25, 7 August 2012 (EDT)

	:He's just gone mad. We aren't gonna "attack" him.--[[User:Prince Ludwig\|Prince Ludwig]] ([[User talk:Prince Ludwig\|talk]]) 15:20, 7 August 2012 (EDT)		:He's just gone mad. We aren't gonna "attack" him. We didn't insult you. We are against the idea.--[[User:Prince Ludwig\|Prince Ludwig]] ([[User talk:Prince Ludwig\|talk]]) 15:20, 7 August 2012 (EDT)