User talk:Bwf8398: Difference between revisions
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Sorry about that. Is there a 1 vs. Rival category? {{User|Bwf8398}} | Sorry about that. Is there a 1 vs. Rival category? {{User|Bwf8398}} | ||
==Your proposal== | |||
Hey i saw you made a proposal about splitting the levels well i'm going to inform you that A you need more than one option and B: we've actually had that proposal before a couple times in fact [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_10#New_Super_Mario_Bros._Level_Articles] and [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_28#New_Super_Mario_Bros._Wii_Level_Split] also your proposal covers to wide of a scope to be a TPP {{User|Raven Effect}} |
Revision as of 18:22, March 11, 2012
Concerning your recent edits to certain minigame articles
Hey there. I know that you're doing your best to help out, but if you look here, you'll see that the "notes" parameter is only to be used if something differs from the U.S. version of a game. In other words, unless there are differences in minigame length between the U.S. version and other versions (in which case those would need to be included), the notes section cannot be used for time limits. Thank you for taking this into consideration. Mario4Ever (talk)
Sorry, I didn't know. Thanks for the heads up!
- No problem, and by the way, you're always welcome to ask me or another admin if you have any questions (though most any user can be of service) Mario4Ever (talk)
Minigame infobox reminder
When insert a the Infobox for the Mario Party minigames, please remember to format the images as this. Thank you.
L151
Good Job!
Thanks for adding those Mario Party 9 articles!SuperPaperFan
Thanks for your help editing!Bwf8398
No problem! Keep up the good work! SuperPaperFan
Free-For-All Minigames
1 vs. Rival minigames aren't free for all minigames :p Raven Effect (talk)
Sorry about that. Is there a 1 vs. Rival category? Bwf8398 (talk)
Your proposal
Hey i saw you made a proposal about splitting the levels well i'm going to inform you that A you need more than one option and B: we've actually had that proposal before a couple times in fact [1] and [2] also your proposal covers to wide of a scope to be a TPP Raven Effect (talk)