Talk:Jester: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Dimentio== | ==Dimentio== | ||
Is there really proof on Dimentio being a Jester, or is that just speculation? {{User:Fawfulfury65/sig}} | Is there really proof on Dimentio being a Jester, or is that just speculation? {{User:Fawfulfury65/sig}} | ||
To be fully honest I placed him there because his article said ''"Dimentio is a magical [[jester]]"'' -[[User:FourPaperHeroes|FourPaperHeroes]] 14:49, 27 February 2010 (EST) | To be fully honest I placed him there because his article said ''"Dimentio is a magical [[jester]]"'' -[[User:FourPaperHeroes|FourPaperHeroes]] 14:49, 27 February 2010 (EST) | ||
:I don't think there is any proof. Both the Jesters of SMRPG and Dimentio are obviously based on the common image of a jester. Whether Dimentio is also inspired by the SMRPG Jesters or is even supposed to be one has not been confirmed. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 17:06, 27 February 2010 (EST) | |||
::Since is not confirmed, I'll delete it. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | |||
==Harlequin== | |||
Would there be enough info on the unused enemy to make its own article, or no? [[User:Lord Grammaticus|Lord Grammaticus]] 03:56, 10 December 2011 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:56, December 10, 2011
Dimentio[edit]
Is there really proof on Dimentio being a Jester, or is that just speculation? Fawfulfury65
To be fully honest I placed him there because his article said "Dimentio is a magical jester" -FourPaperHeroes 14:49, 27 February 2010 (EST)
- I don't think there is any proof. Both the Jesters of SMRPG and Dimentio are obviously based on the common image of a jester. Whether Dimentio is also inspired by the SMRPG Jesters or is even supposed to be one has not been confirmed. --Grandy02 17:06, 27 February 2010 (EST)
- Since is not confirmed, I'll delete it. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
Harlequin[edit]
Would there be enough info on the unused enemy to make its own article, or no? Lord Grammaticus 03:56, 10 December 2011 (EST)
