Talk:Wuhu Island: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:


'''@Opposers''': We don't have an article on Kalimari Desert, and its only appearance is in a course. Let's pretend for a second that Wii Sports, Wii Sports Resort, and Pilotwings Resort never existed. Now, this article is just a location that appears in one course. Of course, those games have no relevance here, so they might as well not have existed. Q.E.D. {{User:Bop1996/sig}}
'''@Opposers''': We don't have an article on Kalimari Desert, and its only appearance is in a course. Let's pretend for a second that Wii Sports, Wii Sports Resort, and Pilotwings Resort never existed. Now, this article is just a location that appears in one course. Of course, those games have no relevance here, so they might as well not have existed. Q.E.D. {{User:Bop1996/sig}}
Wait! I have what I think is a good idea. What if we make this a disambiguation page instead of deleting it? Hyrule is one, and it's a place from another game that certain stages in the spin-offs take place in (yeah, I ended my sentence with a preposition). Anyone with me? {{User|Magikrazy51}}

Revision as of 16:36, December 6, 2011

Template:Tobedeleted

Delete

Proposal.svg This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Sunday, November 24, 2024, 04:28 GMT

Bop put the page up for deletion but it needs to go though proposal first.

I think this page is uneesary, it's not in our coverage and all the good info's is in the articles. If this appears in more than one, it may be restored then but for now the only Mario game it is in is Mario Kart 7 and it only played a minor role.

Proposer: New Super Yoshi (talk)
Deadline: 13 December 2011 23:59 GMT

Support

  1. New Super Yoshi (talk) Per my proposal
  2. Bop1996 (talk) I still hold that this proposal should be deleted too, but since this doesn't seem to be happening, per my reasoning below.
  3. Tails777 (talk) Per proposal.
  4. Magikrazy51 (talk) As long as we have articles on the tracks that take place on Wuhu, this article ain't needed. Per all.
  5. Raven Effect (talk) if it violates policy it has to go
  6. RandomYoshi (talk) — Per Bop. It has no relevance to the Mario series what so ever. Also: per Raven Effect. It violates policy: a good enough reason to not keep this page.

Oppose

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) You want to delete something due to its minority in the game? It has as much information as it can get, it's not a stub, and it gives information about its appearance in a Mario game. Yes, the allusions to the other games can be shortened, but all that is necessary to do is just delete the part that doesn't follow the coverage.
  2. Byllant (talk) - My point here is not that the page is unnecessarily short, many locations have been a minority in many games, the appearance is small but relevant, that or the page should become a disambiguation page.
  3. Akfamilyhome (talk) Per DKPetey99. Although it's not related directly to the Mario series, it has stated it's appearance.
  4. Waluigino1 (talk) Besides having 3 different courses in Mario Kart 7. Mario has been referenced in every game Wuhu Island has appeared in. In Wii Fit and Wii Fit Plus, there is hidden retro Mario sprites all over the island, and the minigames will ask you questions about which ones you saw. In Wii Sports Resort and Pilotwings Resort, if you fly over the small village, you will here a Mii playing Super Mario Bros. I think that's enough appearences to at least warrent a small page.
  5. Nintendo Wii and EA (talk) - Yeah, I've seen theMario spriters in Wii Fit and heard the Super Mario Bros. music. Plus, it has a minor appearance, but a bigger appearance then many of the other courses. Plus, if we were to delete this page, someone should delete the pages on the galaxies with one or two missions.
  6. Super yoshi bros123 (talk) We could put the Wuhu circuits together in one artical. Like Bowser Castle and Rainbow Road, which are one artical about different citcuits.

Comments

It doesn't need to go through proposal; it is clearly unnecessary as per MarioWiki:Coverage, and has almost no information relevant to the Mario-verse now, nor will it have any later without being redundant with course articles. Even if it appears in more than one course, it isn't given a location role in any Mario game, so it won't get created/restored unless that should happen. Bop1996 (Talk)

@Donaldthescotishtwin: It violates policy to keep it, as per my comment above. Please reconsider your reasoning. Bop1996 (Talk)

@Bop1996: That opinion was the why I supported, but if there's a rule against people's opinions then I'll just remove it. Donaldthescotishtwin (talk)

We don't tend to base wiki decisions off opinions, so that's probably a good idea. If you can find a policy-related reason to keep it, I'd love to hear it. Bop1996 (Talk)

@Opposers: We don't have an article on Kalimari Desert, and its only appearance is in a course. Let's pretend for a second that Wii Sports, Wii Sports Resort, and Pilotwings Resort never existed. Now, this article is just a location that appears in one course. Of course, those games have no relevance here, so they might as well not have existed. Q.E.D. Bop1996 (Talk)

Wait! I have what I think is a good idea. What if we make this a disambiguation page instead of deleting it? Hyrule is one, and it's a place from another game that certain stages in the spin-offs take place in (yeah, I ended my sentence with a preposition). Anyone with me? Magikrazy51 (talk)