Template talk:Construction: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div class="notice-template construction boilerplate metadata" id="image-needed" style="text-align: justify; background: #FC5; margin: .5em 2%; padding: 0 1em; border: 1px solid #f22; color:black"> | <div class="notice-template construction boilerplate metadata" id="image-needed" style="text-align: justify; background: #FC5; margin: .5em 2%; padding: 0 1em; border: 1px solid #f22; color:black"> | ||
This article or section is '''under construction'''. | [[File:Mario hammer.gif|left]]This article or section is '''under construction'''. Therefore, please excuse its informal appearance while it's being worked on. We hope to have it completed {{{1|as soon as possible}}}. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
--<span style="text-shadow:#808080 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em" class="texhtml">[[User:B.wilson|<font color="red">Bryce</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/B.wilson|<font color="blue">Wilson</font>]] | [[User talk:B.wilson|<font color="purple">talk</font>]]</span> 05:00, 26 October 2011 (EDT) | --<span style="text-shadow:#808080 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em" class="texhtml">[[User:B.wilson|<font color="red">Bryce</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/B.wilson|<font color="blue">Wilson</font>]] | [[User talk:B.wilson|<font color="purple">talk</font>]]</span> 05:00, 26 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:00, October 26, 2011
This template was originally designed to excuse the incompleteness of a MarioWiki or Help page that was part of a Project (even a PipeProject was tagged for a day). I remember tagging Pipe Plaza, The 'Shroom, Help:Userbox, and one PipeProject before. The category, I agree, we can live without, but this is not for normal articles that are unfinished (and thus stubbed for another contributor to take up). Wayoshi ( T·C·@ ) 02:03, 27 August 2006 (EDT)
Incompleteness
When I look through most of articles with this template on, most say "we hope to have this article completed in no defined time" and some have been left on articles for more than a month. I understand that these kinds of articles take a long time to finish but is it right to leave this template on an article and keep procrastinating about "how you'll do it later"? As Wayoshi said above, maybe we should use this only for MarioWiki pages. What do you guys think?Knife (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2007 (EST)
Template Change
The template would look neater like this:
