User talk:Akfamilyhome/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Sign your comments please...) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Yeah, you can revert his spam, just don't give out 50 last warnings. [[User Talk:Bop1996|Geekiness is an end, not a means -]] [[User:Bop1996|Bop1996]] | :Yeah, you can revert his spam, just don't give out 50 last warnings. [[User Talk:Bop1996|Geekiness is an end, not a means -]] [[User:Bop1996|Bop1996]] | ||
:Whoops, sorry... {{User:Akfamilyhome/sig}} 09:28, 22 October 2011 (EDT) | :Whoops, sorry... {{User:Akfamilyhome/sig}} 09:28, 22 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
::Adding on to what [[User:Bop1996|Bop1996]] said above, please make sure to refrain from doing [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Rawby&diff=next&oldid=1155054 things like this] in the future; it's really unnecessary, and could technically be seen as abusing warning privileges. While the user was vandalizing, and you were right to warn them originally, issuing anyone that many warnings is excessive and unneeded to say the least. If another situation like that arises, and an admin is not immediately available to deal with the situation, it would be better if you just kept reverting the user's vandalism or spamming until an admin does come online. Otherwise, you may end up with your own Warning for abusing warning privileges. | |||
::Thank you. | |||
::{{User:Phoenix/sig}} 06:44, 23 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
== Rawby == | == Rawby == | ||
Revision as of 06:44, October 23, 2011
Who talks here, talks here.
Some Beta Stuff
[[1]] Never mind about Gobblegut's black bulges; I watched this video again and I saw that I was wrong.--Holyromanemperortatan 22:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hey
Check out my pictures on my picture account. The link is on my page in the Mario Kart track idea section. I hope you like them.--File:YoshiMP8a.PNGYoshiGo99
09:39, 21 February 2011 (EST)
From this point on
Just revert his edits, don't add anything, as that's redundant and pointless. Bop1996 (Talk)
- Yeah, you can revert his spam, just don't give out 50 last warnings. Geekiness is an end, not a means - Bop1996
- Whoops, sorry... Akfamilyhome 09:28, 22 October 2011 (EDT)
- Adding on to what Bop1996 said above, please make sure to refrain from doing things like this in the future; it's really unnecessary, and could technically be seen as abusing warning privileges. While the user was vandalizing, and you were right to warn them originally, issuing anyone that many warnings is excessive and unneeded to say the least. If another situation like that arises, and an admin is not immediately available to deal with the situation, it would be better if you just kept reverting the user's vandalism or spamming until an admin does come online. Otherwise, you may end up with your own Warning for abusing warning privileges.
- Thank you.
Rawby
Well I'm not a admin,I did give him a last warn but he's taken it off now,a admin will take care of it when they get on.
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Donaldthescotishtwin (talk).
Thanks :)Akfamilyhome 09:27, 22 October 2011 (EDT)
- I told Lindsay151 about this matter. Hopefully, she'll answer it soon.
M&SG (talk) 09:29, 22 October 2011 (EDT)
- Well, she should be quick, Rawby's now vandalizing pages like crazy! D: Akfamilyhome 09:30, 22 October 2011 (EDT)
