MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Toadette: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (moved MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N/Toadette to MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N1/Toadette: it passed) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{fa-archive}} | ||
|nominated=17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT) | |nominated=17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
|passed=01:34, 2 August 2011 | |passed=01:34, 2 August 2011 | ||
Revision as of 16:45, August 8, 2011
Toadette
Template:Fa-archive |nominated=17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT) |passed=01:34, 2 August 2011 }}
Support
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) I've looked through this article and I found no tense errors or missing information. The article is written like an article (not a story), and there are enough images. All the sections have enough information possible. I think this article is fit to be featured.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- YoshiGo99 (talk)
- DKPetey99 (talk)
- Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
- Toadette rules (talk)
- Byllant (talk)
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
There is still work that must be done. I'll try to add as much as I can to it. DKPetey99 (talk) 17:31, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
Like where? LeftyGreenMario (talk)
Look at my oppose vote. DKPetey99 (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
I don't see how Mario Party 6 and 8 need expansion. In Mario Party Advance, maybe it needs expansion, but I never played the game. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
I personally think we should merge the Mario Party section into one. DKPetey99 (talk) 17:38, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
I'm done. What do you think? LeftyGreenMario (talk)
