MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Toadette: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMSTAT
|nominated=17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
|nominated=17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|passed=01:34, 2 August 2011
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====

Revision as of 20:35, August 1, 2011

Toadette

"Toadette" was nominated for featured article status at 17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT). If the nomination does not pass by 21:16, 30 September 2011, it will be considered failed.

"Toadette" has met FA status requirements at 01:34, 2 August 2011, and it will become a featured article at 20:34, 8 August 2011 if unopposed.

Support

  1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) I've looked through this article and I found no tense errors or missing information. The article is written like an article (not a story), and there are enough images. All the sections have enough information possible. I think this article is fit to be featured.
  2. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
  3. YoshiGo99 (talk)
  4. DKPetey99 (talk)
  5. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)

Oppose

Removal of Opposes

Comments

There is still work that must be done. I'll try to add as much as I can to it. DKPetey99DKPetey99TCE 17:31, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

Like where? LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Look at my oppose vote. DKPetey99DKPetey99TCE 17:34, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

I don't see how Mario Party 6 and 8 need expansion. In Mario Party Advance, maybe it needs expansion, but I never played the game. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

I personally think we should merge the Mario Party section into one. DKPetey99DKPetey99TCE 17:38, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

I'm done. What do you think? LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Toadette&oldid=1108490"