Talk:Pillar: Difference between revisions
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Like what {{User|BoygeyDude}} said, there are complete differences in the two pillars. They both have different movements, different names, different appearances. They are not a "specialized version" of '''Pillar''' or anything of that junk. It is its '''own enemy'''. So frankly, I don't understand your reasoning Coincollector... {{User:Supremo78/sig}} 21:54, 15 July 2011 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:54, July 15, 2011
Split Spike Pillar from Pillar
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Friday, November 22, 2024, 20:11 GMT
Here is the thing. I can relate this to many articles. For example, Unagi. A sup-species, Mega Unagi, has its own page. They are different in actions and have different names. Same thing with Spike Pillar and Pillar. Spike Pillars is a different type of Pillar. It should be made into its own article.
Proposer: Supremo78 (talk)
Deadline: July 19, 2011, 23:59
Support
- Supremo78 (talk) - Of course I'll support my proposal.
- Reddragon19k (talk) Per S78!
- DKPetey99 (talk) Per proposal. Especially reference to Ungai.
- BoygeyDude (talk) There's a BIG difference. The regular pillar is made of wood (possibly, since I can't really tell. :P ), has a flat end, & it's fatter. While the spiked pillar is made of iron, has a pointy end, & it's slightly skinnier.
- SWFlash (talk) While everyone's argeeing with Coincollector's option, I think that it worth splitting. They have different size, difference design, different name, different sound effects, different surface, different purpose, and so on. They aren't alike or even similar, so the fact that we have those articlem merged is still a mystery for me. And so I have to say "Per proposal".
Oppose
- Coincollector (talk) - I'm afraid I have to oppose. Spike Pillar is esentially similar to a Pillar in function, they rise from the surface to crush everythin and that's all. The spikes are the only prominent feature of the Spiked Pillar and can hurt Mario if he touches them, but Spikeless Pillars can also hurt if they are touched. Another controversial observation in the proposal is that you're proposing to create an article with a conjectural name (Looks like there is no official name for these obstacles) which is the only thing that would distingish this from the other but the rest, the information, their function, etc will be same, making this difference pointless.
- Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) per above
- UltraMario3000 (talk) Per the Collector of Coins.
- YoshiGo99 (talk)Per All.
- Zero777 (talk) Per Coincollector
Comments
Like what BoygeyDude (talk) said, there are complete differences in the two pillars. They both have different movements, different names, different appearances. They are not a "specialized version" of Pillar or anything of that junk. It is its own enemy. So frankly, I don't understand your reasoning Coincollector... Supremo 21:54, 15 July 2011 (EDT)