Talk:Fresh Pasta: Difference between revisions
(Vote and Comment, oooh, sneaky.) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#{{user|Bloc Partier}} - See my comment below. Koopasta Dish Set a standard, we should follow it. | #{{user|Bloc Partier}} - See my comment below. Koopasta Dish Set a standard, we should follow it. | ||
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} Vote changed per Bloc Partier and Bop1996's comments below. | #{{User|Bowser's luma}} Vote changed per Bloc Partier and Bop1996's comments below. | ||
#{{User|Nicke8}} Per Bloc Partier | |||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== |
Revision as of 16:53, June 8, 2011
Y'know, I don't see any difference between this & Fresh Pasta. Look! File:FreshPastaBunch SPM.pngFile:PastaFresh.PNG They're identical! o_0 Maybe they should get merged. BoygeyPumpkineer
Merge Fresh Pasta Bunch with Fresh Pasta
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Friday, November 8, 2024, 17:42 GMT
Read my comment above. Both items look identical & both names aren't very different.
Proposer: BoygeyDude (talk)
Deadline: June 20th, 2011, 23:59 GMT
Support
- BoygeyDude (talk) Per the Proposal
- Bloc Partier (talk) - See my comment below. Koopasta Dish Set a standard, we should follow it.
- Bowser's luma (talk) Vote changed per Bloc Partier and Bop1996's comments below.
- Nicke8 (talk) Per Bloc Partier
Oppose
Bowser's luma (talk) Technecally, we shouldn't merge because of the slight difference in name and because they have different effects. This proposal makes me hungry....:)
- Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) 3 things first off one heals 10 hp the other heals 5 hp and cures poison, Fresh Pasta also has more ingredients to make it with, and lastly there not even from the same game why would you want to merge two things that have different names and are from different games.
- Zero777 (talk) Per
- UltraMario3000 (talk) Per all.
- Walkazo (talk) - Per Goomba's Shoe15: different names, ingredients and effects, so different items. Koopasta Dish should have been given its own page: that was an oversight that should be corrected, not a set standard that should be emulated.
- Bop1996 (talk) Per Walkazo.
Comments
The same item can still have different boost values in different games. BoygeyPumpkineer
- There not the same item they look very very similar but they are not identical and they have different names Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
The names aren't THAT different. :/ BoygeyPumpkineer
- So what the point is they have different names different effects and appear in different games it makes no sense to merge them together since their different items Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
Ayo, just throwing another opinion in here: we did merge Koopasta into Koopasta Dish because of the similar names/appearances. Also, they were merged despite a difference in effects. That's a pretty significant point. Bloc Partier (talk)
- I'd like to point out that theres no proposal that did that somebody just merged them together and nobody undid it so there really isnt a set standard for this Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
- I'd like to point out that what that means is that no one objected, so there was some sort of consensus Bop1996 (Talk)
- Yes but from what i can see that was an isolated incident not a set standard i also don't know enough about the two dishes cause if they do the same thing than it's different because these two don't do the same thing Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
- I see what you're saying. My point was simply that a TPP doesn't have to be used to show why something was changed. I agree that it was a mistake to merge Koopasta, but the fact that it wasn't done by TPP doesn't invalidate the decision. I want everyone to vote for the right reasons, regardless of which side they vote on ;) Bop1996 (Talk)
- Yes but from what i can see that was an isolated incident not a set standard i also don't know enough about the two dishes cause if they do the same thing than it's different because these two don't do the same thing Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
- I'd like to point out that what that means is that no one objected, so there was some sort of consensus Bop1996 (Talk)