User talk:DarknessLord: Difference between revisions
DarknessLord (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Two minor delinks) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Talk about moi! | Talk about moi! | ||
Hey, thanks for coming over from the DK Wiki! Although you are welcome to edit on all topics, if you would like to focus on just DK info, follow this link: "Category: Donkey Kong Categories". This page has a list of all Donkey Kong related categories, and those categories have lists with DK-only info. As such, you can keep editing DK info without trouble, as all the franchises in this wiki are seperated by categories. That means you won't find [[Bowser]] or [[Wario]] in any DK related category or list. Also, we are updating the knowledge navigation lists on the sidebar. They will be split into sections for all the franchises, including the DK series. Again, that means DK info will be listed without being mixed in with the larger Mario series. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | |||
Oh. And a [[MarioWiki: DKWiki Portal|Donkey Kong Portal]] just opened, to organize and chat about articles in the DK series. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | |||
== Red links == | |||
'''Stop removing them'''. A Red link mean that the article isn't created yet, removing them mean than there will be less chance of having those articles created. | |||
[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] | |||
You're kidding, right? Take "DK Logos" for example. First of all, that's not even the official name. Second, they're extremely minor things in a seven-year-old game. I don't see reason for someone to want to create that article in the first place. I'm not trying to pick a fight, just making a point. [[User:DarknessLord|DarknessLord]] 12:36, 6 October 2007 (EDT) | |||
Ermm... We have an article on [[Cheese]], PLus, don't the DK Logo affect the Gameplay in some way? That's notable. | |||
[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] | |||
Whatever. Sorry, but I'm used to the "nothing minor gets its own page rule" at Wikipedia. [[User:DarknessLord|DarknessLord]] 12:47, 6 October 2007 (EDT) | |||
: No harm done, I myself think that some article we ahve here are too minor to warrant an article, (Like pretty much every article about "implied" subject, like [[Old Man Skoo]], or article about a random Paper Mario NPC that actually don't do | |||
anything.) For me, if it affect the storyline or the gameplay in any way, it's notable. | |||
[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] |
Latest revision as of 20:14, May 28, 2011
Talk about moi!
Hey, thanks for coming over from the DK Wiki! Although you are welcome to edit on all topics, if you would like to focus on just DK info, follow this link: "Category: Donkey Kong Categories". This page has a list of all Donkey Kong related categories, and those categories have lists with DK-only info. As such, you can keep editing DK info without trouble, as all the franchises in this wiki are seperated by categories. That means you won't find Bowser or Wario in any DK related category or list. Also, we are updating the knowledge navigation lists on the sidebar. They will be split into sections for all the franchises, including the DK series. Again, that means DK info will be listed without being mixed in with the larger Mario series. -- Son of Suns
Oh. And a Donkey Kong Portal just opened, to organize and chat about articles in the DK series. -- Son of Suns
Red links[edit]
Stop removing them. A Red link mean that the article isn't created yet, removing them mean than there will be less chance of having those articles created. Glowsquid
You're kidding, right? Take "DK Logos" for example. First of all, that's not even the official name. Second, they're extremely minor things in a seven-year-old game. I don't see reason for someone to want to create that article in the first place. I'm not trying to pick a fight, just making a point. DarknessLord 12:36, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
Ermm... We have an article on Cheese, PLus, don't the DK Logo affect the Gameplay in some way? That's notable. Glowsquid
Whatever. Sorry, but I'm used to the "nothing minor gets its own page rule" at Wikipedia. DarknessLord 12:47, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
- No harm done, I myself think that some article we ahve here are too minor to warrant an article, (Like pretty much every article about "implied" subject, like Old Man Skoo, or article about a random Paper Mario NPC that actually don't do
anything.) For me, if it affect the storyline or the gameplay in any way, it's notable. Glowsquid