Template talk:Gone: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose) |
UltraMario (talk | contribs) m (→Oppose) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Having this template hurts no one! I've used it once, so why not use it again? | #{{User|DKPetey99}} Having this template hurts no one! I've used it once, so why not use it again? | ||
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Multiple users are using, so why delete it when there will just be a red link? | |||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Revision as of 20:25, May 16, 2011
Delete Template:Gone
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Sunday, January 12, 2025, 10:05 GMT
Proposer: Superfiremario (talk)
Deadline: May 26, 2011, 23:59 GMT
This should be deleted. One, people hardly even use this template. Two, we shouldn't have these "user" templates because you can just put this coding down.
Support
- Superfiremario (talk) Per my proposal.
- Bop1996 (talk) Per this proposal and the one on Template talk:Vacation.
- Reddragon19k (talk) I say lose it and that is a per both!
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Per Bop
- Mariomario64 (talk) Meh, I was thinking about making this proposal myself, but I didn't have time to. :/
- Zero777 (talk) Per all
- Mario4Ever (talk) Per all.
- Nicke8 (talk) I checked. Only 3 users use it. One is blocked!
Oppose
- DKPetey99 (talk) Having this template hurts no one! I've used it once, so why not use it again?
- UltraMario3000 (talk) Multiple users are using, so why delete it when there will just be a red link?
