MarioWiki talk:Appeals: Difference between revisions
(→last: umm pretty sure these warnings shouldnt be reverted!) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Look at me, I found a potential problem, ain't I something?== | ==Look at me, I found a potential problem, ain't I something?== | ||
The page says that you cannot appeal a reminder issued by an Administrator, but the first appeal is one where the user that issued the reminder/warning ''was'' a sysop when the reminder/warning was issued, but is not anymore? It seems we need more specificity here... {{User:Bop1996/sig}} | The page says that you cannot appeal a reminder issued by an Administrator, but the first appeal is one where the user that issued the reminder/warning ''was'' a sysop when the reminder/warning was issued, but is not anymore? It seems we need more specificity here... {{User:Bop1996/sig}} | ||
:Yes, but Jorge has been demoted since. Think of this scenario: I give hundreds of users warnings, for the reason "die". There's a 100% chance I would be demoted for that. After I was demoted, would those warnings be unrevertable? {{User:Marioguy1/sig}} | |||
== last == | == last == | ||
Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
::The first one isn't because that was for userspace '''and''' for making useless redirects and flooding the recent changes log. The valid warnings SFM have are: [[User talk:Superfiremario/Archive 1#Warning|this one]], [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php title=User_talk:Superfiremario&diff=prev&oldid=985719 this one], [[User talk:Superfiremario/Archive 2#Warning|this one]], and [[User talk:Superfiremario#Warning]], so I don't think he should appeal to delete these because one of the last warnings is also for editing on archives! {{User:DKPetey99/sig}} 21:25, 13 May 2011 (EDT) | ::The first one isn't because that was for userspace '''and''' for making useless redirects and flooding the recent changes log. The valid warnings SFM have are: [[User talk:Superfiremario/Archive 1#Warning|this one]], [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php title=User_talk:Superfiremario&diff=prev&oldid=985719 this one], [[User talk:Superfiremario/Archive 2#Warning|this one]], and [[User talk:Superfiremario#Warning]], so I don't think he should appeal to delete these because one of the last warnings is also for editing on archives! {{User:DKPetey99/sig}} 21:25, 13 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
:::To answer the original question, you are allowed to appeal anything; so long as it is a warning. {{User:Marioguy1/sig}} |
Revision as of 20:30, May 13, 2011
???
Why was the article unprotected?--Holyromanemperortatan 19:07, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
- So people can make appeals, which was the whole purpose of the page. Yoshiwaker 19:09, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
- Also, the only reason it was protected was because it was under construction. Mario4Ever (talk)
- Ohhh. Well thank you to both of you!--Holyromanemperortatan 19:12, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
- Also, the only reason it was protected was because it was under construction. Mario4Ever (talk)
This may or may not be a stupid question, but...
Can anyone put notices on a user's page if a reminder/warning given by him or her is in dispute and the user who received the warning/reminder does not alert the other user, or is this limited solely to the administration? Mario4Ever (talk)
Suggestion
It needs comments section badly. SWFlash
Look at me, I found a potential problem, ain't I something?
The page says that you cannot appeal a reminder issued by an Administrator, but the first appeal is one where the user that issued the reminder/warning was a sysop when the reminder/warning was issued, but is not anymore? It seems we need more specificity here... Bop1996 (Talk)
- Yes, but Jorge has been demoted since. Think of this scenario: I give hundreds of users warnings, for the reason "die". There's a 100% chance I would be demoted for that. After I was demoted, would those warnings be unrevertable? ( | )
last
Are you allowed to appeal lst warnings? Superfiremario 21:02, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
Not these two. These are invalid.
- @Superfiremario You can appeal any warning/reminder so long as it wasn't issued to you by an administrator. Mario4Ever (talk)
- The first one isn't because that was for userspace and for making useless redirects and flooding the recent changes log. The valid warnings SFM have are: this one, title=User_talk:Superfiremario&diff=prev&oldid=985719 this one, this one, and User talk:Superfiremario#Warning, so I don't think he should appeal to delete these because one of the last warnings is also for editing on archives! DKPetey99TCE 21:25, 13 May 2011 (EDT)