Editing User talk:Time Q/Unfeature

To make the DPL work, we'll need to make a new category and possibly a new template (not FANOMSTAT, but similar too). Let me know if you need help with the specifics. {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 10:20, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
:Yup, this is only a first version without changing anything on parameters, templates and stuff. I planned to put this draft on [[MarioWiki talk:Featured Articles|Featured Articles talk]] first before doing the technical stuff. It'd be great if you could help with me this, that is making templates (we'd need a template similar to {{tem|FASTAT}} too; I suck at making templates...) etc. Thanks! {{User:Time Q/sig}} 10:32, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
::Well, you've certainly put a lot of effort into this. ;) About the template &ndash; perhaps it could be titled {{fakelink|Template:UNFSTAT}}, or {{fakelink|Template:Unfeature}}. I'd aslo suggest to make the template different-colored to avoid confusion, (ex: rather than <font color=gold>gold</font> and black, use <font color=lightgray>light gray</font> and black). When you decide what you believe is best, I'd be more than happy to make the template. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 11:08, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 To make the DPL work, we'll need to make a new category and possibly a new template (not FANOMSTAT, but similar too). Let me know if you need help with the specifics. {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 10:20, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
 :Yup, this is only a first version without changing anything on parameters, templates and stuff. I planned to put this draft on [[MarioWiki talk:Featured Articles|Featured Articles talk]] first before doing the technical stuff. It'd be great if you could help with me this, that is making templates (we'd need a template similar to {{tem|FASTAT}} too; I suck at making templates...) etc. Thanks! {{User:Time Q/sig}} 10:32, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
-::Well, you've certainly put a lot of effort into this. ;) About the template &ndash; perhaps it could be titled {{fake link|Template:UNFSTAT}}, or {{fake link|Template:Unfeature}}. I'd aslo suggest to make the template different-colored to avoid confusion, (ex: rather than <font color=gold>gold</font> and black, use <font color=lightgray>light gray</font> and black). When you decide what you believe is best, I'd be more than happy to make the template. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 11:08, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
+::Well, you've certainly put a lot of effort into this. ;) About the template &ndash; perhaps it could be titled {{fakelink|Template:UNFSTAT}}, or {{fakelink|Template:Unfeature}}. I'd aslo suggest to make the template different-colored to avoid confusion, (ex: rather than <font color=gold>gold</font> and black, use <font color=lightgray>light gray</font> and black). When you decide what you believe is best, I'd be more than happy to make the template. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 11:08, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
-:::That would be awesome if you could make the template. Your color suggestion also sounds good - it shouldn't be too colorful, after all the FA status of an article is at risk, which is a sad thing ;) If Wayo could take charge of the more formal templates, that would be great too. Thanks! {{User:Time Q/sig}} 15:46, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
-::::Alright, glad to hear you liked the color-scheme idea. I've made three examples: [[User:Stooben Rooben/Test/Trial|example I]], [[User:Stooben Rooben/Test|example II]], and [[User:Stooben Rooben/Proposal Example|example III]]. Which one do you think is best? {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 16:14, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
-:::::Cool. I like the first best. I would agree with any of the other ones if there are other opinions as well, though. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 16:24, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
-::::::Cool, that's the one I like best. I can make the gray a little dark if you'd like as well. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 16:29, 21 September 2008 (EDT)