Editing User talk:TheUltimateKoopa
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Wario Land II == | == Wario Land II == | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
{{Reminder||Writing comments on pages. Ya, now you wrote a comment about the character in the article and unlike the above comment, that '''is''' wrong'''. Please use talk pages in the future}}{{User|Marioguy1}} | {{Reminder||Writing comments on pages. Ya, now you wrote a comment about the character in the article and unlike the above comment, that '''is''' wrong'''. Please use talk pages in the future}}{{User|Marioguy1}} | ||
== Reminder == | == Reminder == | ||
{{reminder||spamming pages}}<span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User talk:Yoshario|Y]]'''oshario'''</font></span>[[ | {{reminder||spamming pages}}<span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User talk:Yoshario|Y]]'''oshario'''</font></span>[[Image:Yoshi_wearing_mario's hat.jpg|30px]] | ||
== Block == | == Block == | ||
| Line 44: | Line 43: | ||
==Warning== | ==Warning== | ||
{{Warning|2=not assuming good faith}} | {{Warning|2=not assuming good faith}} (Admin Note: This warning is void.) | ||
(Admin Note: This warning is void.) | |||
:Please stop using swearing words on the summary. {{User:Mr bones/sig}} 19:55, 17 April 2010 (EDT) | :Please stop using swearing words on the summary. {{User:Mr bones/sig}} 19:55, 17 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
:You did use swearing words on your edit summary.That is vandalizing even if you're angry or something like that.{{User:Mr bones/sig}} | :You did use swearing words on your edit summary.That is vandalizing even if you're angry or something like that.{{User:Mr bones/sig}} | ||
| Line 61: | Line 59: | ||
:He was correct. It's disallowed in articles themselves and is discouraged in userspace articles, though there's nothing about edit summaries. Technically, you didn't break any rules, though you still shouldn't do it again. {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} 18:35, 29 April 2010 (EDT) | :He was correct. It's disallowed in articles themselves and is discouraged in userspace articles, though there's nothing about edit summaries. Technically, you didn't break any rules, though you still shouldn't do it again. {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} 18:35, 29 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
<blockquote>(diff) (hist) Super Mario Galaxy | <blockquote>(diff) (hist) Super Mario Galaxy 2; 12:01 . . (+75) . . TheUltimateKoopa (Talk | contribs | block) (F you Coincollector. You had NO proof there wasn't a Throwback Galaxy, and what's this? It's a clip of the Throwback Galaxy.)</blockquote> | ||
Consider this another warning. You might want to put more thought into your words, as even an implied insult is still an insult. Don't address another user disrespectfully again in any form, or you will have to face consequences. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 08:59, 17 May 2010 (EDT) | Consider this another warning. You might want to put more thought into your words, as even an implied insult is still an insult. Don't address another user disrespectfully again in any form, or you will have to face consequences. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 08:59, 17 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
| Line 67: | Line 65: | ||
:Two reasons: Obviously it was really short and there were very little information available about it. It seems you were the only that knew of it, but even you didn't know so much about that level and therefore the article remained miserable til now. You have told me that you have sources for the '''name''' of the galaxy (as well as the info about the galaxy), so I want to know those sources because the article is an upcoming subject with conjectural title and it's likely it should be deleted by that. {{User:Coincollector/sig}} You can discuss on that in the article's talk page. | :Two reasons: Obviously it was really short and there were very little information available about it. It seems you were the only that knew of it, but even you didn't know so much about that level and therefore the article remained miserable til now. You have told me that you have sources for the '''name''' of the galaxy (as well as the info about the galaxy), so I want to know those sources because the article is an upcoming subject with conjectural title and it's likely it should be deleted by that. {{User:Coincollector/sig}} You can discuss on that in the article's talk page. | ||
