Editing User talk:Shiancoe
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
That makes a lot of sense. You'll have to excuse me - I'm glad you took the time to correct me, and if you haven't already, I'll change the article back to the way you had it. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 00:07, 17 February 2009 (EST) | That makes a lot of sense. You'll have to excuse me - I'm glad you took the time to correct me, and if you haven't already, I'll change the article back to the way you had it. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 00:07, 17 February 2009 (EST) | ||
:I explained to you waht patrolling rights mean on [[MarioWiki talk:Patrollers]]. Cheers, <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User talk:Yoshario|Y]]'''oshario'''</font></span>[[ | :I explained to you waht patrolling rights mean on [[MarioWiki talk:Patrollers]]. Cheers, <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User talk:Yoshario|Y]]'''oshario'''</font></span>[[Image:Yoshi_wearing_mario's hat.jpg|30px]] | ||
==RE: Proposal Extension== | ==RE: Proposal Extension== | ||
Yeah, I am trying to follow policy, and official policy states a tie vote is no quorum and no action is taken on either side. If we were to implement an "tie extension" rule to the proposal process, there should probably be a proposal to change the rules. We try to do things (somewhat) democratically around here. -- {{User|Son of Suns}} | Yeah, I am trying to follow policy, and official policy states a tie vote is no quorum and no action is taken on either side. If we were to implement an "tie extension" rule to the proposal process, there should probably be a proposal to change the rules. We try to do things (somewhat) democratically around here. -- {{User|Son of Suns}} | ||