Editing User talk:RandomYoshi
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{TOCright}} | ||
{{User:RandomYoshi/talkarchive}} | {{User:RandomYoshi/talkarchive}} | ||
Hi there! This is my funky talk-page! | Hi there! This is my funky talk-page! | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::I want to become random friends with you too! | ::I want to become random friends with you too! | ||
::{{Userbox|border=#ff0|mainbkgd=#f00|codebkgd=#ffffff|codecolor=black|code=[[Image: | ::{{Userbox|border=#ff0|mainbkgd=#f00|codebkgd=#ffffff|codecolor=black|code=[[Image:Redddtoaddd.PNG|40px]]|msg=<span style="color:black">This user is friends with [[User:Super Nintendo 64|Super Nintendo 64.]]</span>}} | ||
::{{User:Super Nintendo 64/sig|The continuous border and the dumb </div>(also fixed)}} | ::{{User:Super Nintendo 64/sig|The continuous border and the dumb </div>(also fixed)}} | ||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
ANYWAY, the reason why I so rudely edited your userpage, is that I finally made that [edit] button you proposed. After trying on-and-off for months to figure out how to make the [edit] button automated like on Wikipedia, I have found that it cannot, in fact, be done. I still had hopes of getting the link-inputting to at least run itself so that we'd only need to put <nowiki>{{Edit}}</nowiki> on every template, or perhaps <nowiki>{{Edit|PAGENAME}}</nowiki>, but substitution's a pain in the rear, and in light of [[User_talk:UntergangerPlus|another user's recent attempt]] to make a VTE template, I decided to just give up on that as too much trouble for what it's worth, and just make what I ''did'' manage to code into [[Template:Edit]] (having already made the necessary adjustments to [[MediaWiki:Common.css]] earlier this month). It can now be implemented en-mass to all the nav templates. Dunno if you're still interested in doing that, but since it was your idea originally, I thought I should let you know either-way. I ''do'' want to be part of the adding, however: I spent a lot of time on research and coding, and would like to get to partake in the fun rollout half too. The sooner we start, the better. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 18:08, 26 October 2015 (EDT) | ANYWAY, the reason why I so rudely edited your userpage, is that I finally made that [edit] button you proposed. After trying on-and-off for months to figure out how to make the [edit] button automated like on Wikipedia, I have found that it cannot, in fact, be done. I still had hopes of getting the link-inputting to at least run itself so that we'd only need to put <nowiki>{{Edit}}</nowiki> on every template, or perhaps <nowiki>{{Edit|PAGENAME}}</nowiki>, but substitution's a pain in the rear, and in light of [[User_talk:UntergangerPlus|another user's recent attempt]] to make a VTE template, I decided to just give up on that as too much trouble for what it's worth, and just make what I ''did'' manage to code into [[Template:Edit]] (having already made the necessary adjustments to [[MediaWiki:Common.css]] earlier this month). It can now be implemented en-mass to all the nav templates. Dunno if you're still interested in doing that, but since it was your idea originally, I thought I should let you know either-way. I ''do'' want to be part of the adding, however: I spent a lot of time on research and coding, and would like to get to partake in the fun rollout half too. The sooner we start, the better. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 18:08, 26 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
:Nah, it's your userpage, so if you want the "+", definitely keep it: this was just a freak accident, and no non-admin could redo the mistake anyway, so odds are, it won't happen again. Glad you like the [edit] template! I'm free the rest of this afternoon and tomorrow afternoon, so if you're free, any time the next couple days will work for me: just let me know when you're ready. Once we start, we should try to finish in one go, however: otherwise, there will be glaring inconsistencies in the meantime (especially evident in template blocks on big pages) - plus, if we stop or take it too leisurely, other users might just swoop in and snipe the rest of them (I've seen multiple proposals sniped recently - one even got hijacked ''twice'', after the first attempt was reverted for being done wrong). The easiest way to split the load is just going through [[:Category:Navigation | :Nah, it's your userpage, so if you want the "+", definitely keep it: this was just a freak accident, and no non-admin could redo the mistake anyway, so odds are, it won't happen again. Glad you like the [edit] template! I'm free the rest of this afternoon and tomorrow afternoon, so if you're free, any time the next couple days will work for me: just let me know when you're ready. Once we start, we should try to finish in one go, however: otherwise, there will be glaring inconsistencies in the meantime (especially evident in template blocks on big pages) - plus, if we stop or take it too leisurely, other users might just swoop in and snipe the rest of them (I've seen multiple proposals sniped recently - one even got hijacked ''twice'', after the first attempt was reverted for being done wrong). The easiest way to split the load is just going through [[:Category:Navigation Templates]] systematically - you start with A and go down, I start with Y and go up, and we meet in the middle somewhere depending on our respective speeds. Sounds good? - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 17:35, 27 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
::I'm in EDT, so I guess 5 hours after you, according to Google. Anyway, I managed to wake up in the morning today, so if we start soonish, you shouldn't have to stay up late. If it works for you, I could just pop onto chat to coordinate the exact start time. Just gotta run and feed one of my pets first (he's a fussy eater, so it's a bit of an event, but I should be back by 10:00 EDT / 3:00 pm CET). Talk to you soon! - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 09:42, 28 October 2015 (EDT) | ::I'm in EDT, so I guess 5 hours after you, according to Google. Anyway, I managed to wake up in the morning today, so if we start soonish, you shouldn't have to stay up late. If it works for you, I could just pop onto chat to coordinate the exact start time. Just gotta run and feed one of my pets first (he's a fussy eater, so it's a bit of an event, but I should be back by 10:00 EDT / 3:00 pm CET). Talk to you soon! - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 09:42, 28 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
| Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
Hey Random Yoshi it's me. I'm using this account because I forgot my password on the Lord Fawful and Shroob Master ones, so yeah I'm gonna be using this account for now on. {{User|Fawful's Minion}} | Hey Random Yoshi it's me. I'm using this account because I forgot my password on the Lord Fawful and Shroob Master ones, so yeah I'm gonna be using this account for now on. {{User|Fawful's Minion}} | ||
== {{tem| | == {{tem|Conjecturaltext}} proposal == | ||
Hello. I noticed your [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 44#Prohibit the Usage of .7B.7Bconjecturaltext.7D.7D in Headers|proposal]] to remove {{tem| | Hello. I noticed your [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 44#Prohibit the Usage of .7B.7Bconjecturaltext.7D.7D in Headers|proposal]] to remove {{tem|Conjecturaltext}} from headers passed almost five months back, but no action has been taken yet. Was this done for a reason or did no one just get around to doing so yet? | ||
Additionally, I read some of the comments on the proposal about stating that subjects are conjectural without the use of the template and I was thinking that maybe something could be added to [[MarioWiki:Glitches]] stating that all glitch names are conjectural? For other subjects besides glitches where confusion could be caused without the use of the header, something could be added to [[MarioWiki:Conjecture]] about the same. --{{User:Driftmaster130/sig}} 12:04, 29 May 2016 (EDT) | Additionally, I read some of the comments on the proposal about stating that subjects are conjectural without the use of the template and I was thinking that maybe something could be added to [[MarioWiki:Glitches]] stating that all glitch names are conjectural? For other subjects besides glitches where confusion could be caused without the use of the header, something could be added to [[MarioWiki:Conjecture]] about the same. --{{User:Driftmaster130/sig}} 12:04, 29 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
