Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 409: |
Line 409: |
| :I stole Wario's head, put it in an air tight fish bowl, and I used it as great opportunity for the perils of keeping fish in bowls! The only appropriate fish to put in fishbowls are WARIO HEADS. Remember that. {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:33, March 1, 2025 (EST) | | :I stole Wario's head, put it in an air tight fish bowl, and I used it as great opportunity for the perils of keeping fish in bowls! The only appropriate fish to put in fishbowls are WARIO HEADS. Remember that. {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:33, March 1, 2025 (EST) |
| ::Thank you for returning my six golden coins to me! If he ever shows up near my userpage again, I'll shove a fishbowl onto his noggin. {{User:DryBonesBandit/sig}} 14:50, March 1, 2025 (EST) | | ::Thank you for returning my six golden coins to me! If he ever shows up near my userpage again, I'll shove a fishbowl onto his noggin. {{User:DryBonesBandit/sig}} 14:50, March 1, 2025 (EST) |
|
| |
| == Minigames ==
| |
|
| |
| Will all minigames be allowed Overview sections, [[microgame]]s from ''WarioWare'' included, or just the ''Mario Party'' series? [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 22:30, March 2, 2025 (EST)
| |
| :The proposal[https://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/74#Merge_introduction.2Fending_sections_for_Mario_Party_minigame_articles_.2B_potential_retitling_of_Gameplay_section] clearly have the minigames in mind in terms of poorly written sections. Do you believe the microgames have problematic structures that you believe the proposal needed to address? {{User:Mario/sig}} 01:05, March 3, 2025 (EST)
| |
| ::I think, for example, now that I take a look at [[Crazy Cars]], it's a bit all over the place with the history section at the top and the Gameplay shoved to the bottom. This is one microgame that I think would benefit from an Overview section. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 08:53, March 3, 2025 (EST)
| |
| :::That'll probably require a new discussion. The structure of this article differs so drastically from the Mario Party minigame pages, which the problematic structure is a feature on ''every'' page. {{User:Mario/sig}} 18:23, March 3, 2025 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Notes ==
| |
|
| |
| I wanted to ask if "Notes" is acceptable at times, being a lot more professional than Trivia. For example, when I redid the [[Face-Lift (minigame)|Face-Lift]] page, the information on the "Super Bowser 64" asset seemed isolated from a lot of the information, and I feel that it works better as part of the Notes section. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 23:27, March 4, 2025 (EST)
| |
| :In this case, the information fits in the overview section, which does state what the minigame is based on. The information is support for the claim that the minigame makes fun of the original title screen, so it should be placed after that claim. Notes would be acceptable for miscellaneous information that wouldn't fit elsewhere without being awkwardly lumped, such as the end of the opening summary of an article. {{User:Mario/sig}} 19:46, March 5, 2025 (EST)
| |