| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{block|reason=repeatedly adding and readding forum talk comments to pages after they've been removed, on top of a substantial warning and block history}} | | {{Welcome|name=LTIan}} |
| | |
| == Trouble == | | == Trouble == |
|
| |
|
| Line 66: |
Line 67: |
| Like it? The unique artwork from the pinball machine. I just finished it off today, editing out of the background in Photoshop. I'm still collecting info for the article, but it should be finished soon. Thanks for your patience :) | | Like it? The unique artwork from the pinball machine. I just finished it off today, editing out of the background in Photoshop. I'm still collecting info for the article, but it should be finished soon. Thanks for your patience :) |
|
| |
|
| :{{plain link|1=[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User:YoshiKong/Work&curid=131350&diff=1384753&oldid=1372420 Latest edit]}}. | | :{{Plainlink|1=[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User:YoshiKong/Work&curid=131350&diff=1384753&oldid=1372420 Latest edit]}}. |
|
| |
|
| {{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 07:40, 29 December 2012 (EST) | | {{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 07:40, 29 December 2012 (EST) |
| Line 109: |
Line 110: |
| == Last warning == | | == Last warning == |
|
| |
|
| {{Last warning}} | | {{Lastwarn}} |
| {{plain link|1=[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User:LTIan&curid=146255&diff=1485191&oldid=1484626&rcid=1597078 This]}}, along with your recent forum and behavior on the wiki has earned you a last warning. If you break anymore rules, you will be blocked. | | {{Plainlink|1=[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User:LTIan&curid=146255&diff=1485191&oldid=1484626&rcid=1597078 This]}}, along with your recent forum and behavior on the wiki has earned you a last warning. If you break anymore rules, you will be blocked. |
|
| |
|
| {{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 21:34, 9 June 2013 (EDT) | | {{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 21:34, 9 June 2013 (EDT) |
| Line 127: |
Line 128: |
| {{aboutfile-reminder}} | | {{aboutfile-reminder}} |
| Please Insert the EXACT link of where you got the file from. I will go set the copyright for you. If you plan on using this file on your user page, add <nowiki>{{personal-image|LTlan}}</nowiki>. If you need any more help, contact me or an admin. Have a good day - {{User:Pandg2/sig}} 20:06, 17 February 2016 (EST) | | Please Insert the EXACT link of where you got the file from. I will go set the copyright for you. If you plan on using this file on your user page, add <nowiki>{{personal-image|LTlan}}</nowiki>. If you need any more help, contact me or an admin. Have a good day - {{User:Pandg2/sig}} 20:06, 17 February 2016 (EST) |
|
| |
| :Per [[MarioWiki:Personal files]], tagged [[:File:Castle bleck by acrossthedimensions-d6ui8z9.png]] with {{tem|personal-file}}. If you don't want it, you can just add <code>-abandoned</code> to the tag ({{tem|personal-file-abandoned}}). --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:03, 17 February 2016 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ::If you want to know where I found it, here, take a look: http://acrossthedimensions.deviantart.com/art/Castle-Bleck-414036981
| |
|
| |
| == Article discussion ==
| |
|
| |
| Please [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Paper_Mario:_Color_Splash&diff=prev&oldid=2002143 don't] make [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Kammy_Koopa&diff=prev&oldid=2002142 discussion on article talk pages], that doesn't involve improving the page. If you need to talk about topics like this, go the [[mb:|Mario Boards]] instead.
| |
|
| |
| {{User:L151/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| == Reminder ==
| |
|
| |
| {{reminder|2=creating stub articles}}
| |
| Even though I made a small expansion to the Mario encyclopedia book page, creating new stub articles alone is still a level one offence, and you were already reminded about this before. When creating an article, it should generally be at least 350 bytes (The size can be checked on the History page). And while we're happy to add to it, ''some'' effort should still at least be put into the first edit; Don't have one sentence worth of info. Thanks. {{user:Mario jc/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| ::I can find a picture of the cover of the book, if it helps. :) --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 13:54, 18 June 2016 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Koopalings ==
| |
|
| |
| Why did you do the [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Paper_Mario:_Color_Splash&diff=prev&oldid=2003643 same exact edit] after you knew it was removed before? If you saw my [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Paper_Mario:_Color_Splash&diff=next&oldid=2002489 summary], the reason I removed it was because even though it's been implied the Koopalings will appear, we don't know if all of them will appear in the game, let alone as bosses (Take Mario & Sonic Rio 2016 and Paper Jam, for example). It's better to just wait for more info to come out, so unless you have a source, please don't do it again. {{user:Mario jc/sig}}
| |
| ::If the Koopalings are really going to be in this game, I feel we should add all of their names. Source or no source, I think we should keep their names listed just in case.--[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 01:45, 23 June 2016 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :::Sorry, but info shouldn't be added "just in case" they're true. They never directly mentioned anyone besides Morton, so why list the names of the Koopalings that haven't even been shown yet? All Nintendo said was that "the Koopalings" will appear, so to be on the safer side, it should appropriately be left as "Koopalings". I'm sorry if the listing bothers you, but that's how it should be for now. Again, wait for more announcements on them, ''then'' they can be added. {{user:Mario jc/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| ::::No, that's not what I meant. I said they never mentioned anyone "besides Morton", so when I meant it should be "left as Koopalings", I also meant in addition to Morton, because he was confirmed. Sorry if that wasn't clear (I made another [[Talk:Paper Mario: Color Splash#Remove Morton Koopa, Jr. from Boss List|post]] regarding this on Colour Splash's talk page). {{user:Mario jc/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| :::::Well, it doesn't matter now. The other Koopaling names are now placed in the "Others" section until further notice of any more bosses.--[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 00:08, 24 June 2016 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ::::::Yeah, I know. Just wanted to clear up any misunderstanding. {{user:Mario jc/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| == Bowser ==
| |
|
| |
| Again, however likely it may be, please stop adding info on the off chance it's true; only add if it ''is'' true. Unlike the Koopalings, which were confirmed, there is no source stating or mentioning Bowser's involvement in the game, so don't list his name as it counts as false info and speculation. The "Others" section is not there for that kind of info; it's for characters that ''have'' been confirmed, but with currently unspecified roles. Add any more speculative or unsourced information and you will receive a warning. {{user:Mario jc/sig}}
| |
| ::Fine. I won't even add B.J. (Bowser Junior) in the others section. But in the event if I'm right about Bowser or BJ, I want my account blocked until the game's official release date.--[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 00:53, 24 June 2016 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Reminder ==
| |
|
| |
| {{reminder|2=entering speculation into [[Paper Mario: Color Splash|articles about upcoming games]]}}
| |
| Please stop adding all the Koopalings into the page, so far only Morton Koopa Jr. has been confirmed so let's just leave it at that also please source the edit if you really did see it thanks. {{User:Fawful's Minion/sig}} 04:38, 22 July 2016 (EDT)
| |
| ::I wanted to put the rest of the Koopalings names in the "others" section", just in case if any of their names are mentioned. MarioJC said I could. Ask him/her! He'll/she'll vouch for me! --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 09:37, 24 July 2016 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :::Please read carefully what's been said to you; I never said you should add the other six names, just those that have been explicity confirmed (that is, the "Koopalings" and Morton). Nintendo confirmed the '''Koopalings''' would appear as bosses (but never stated their names), and '''Morton''' was shown in some gameplay footage, so I don't see anything wrong with having the listing be just "Koopalings" and Morton's name. Considering we're dealing with upcoming content, that's how it should be for now; the rest will be added once we have a source that '''''100%''''' confirms their appearance, by name or otherwise, so please stop adding their names "just in case" (as I've stated ''twice'' before already) or remove Morton's name. We're not going to restructure something just because it [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Paper_Mario:_Color_Splash&diff=prev&oldid=2019832 "aggravates"] someone or doesn't meet that person's expectations. {{user:Mario jc/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| :::Can I at least rename the 'Koopalings' in the Bosses section to 'Koopaling' since only Morton's name is shown? It can still be linked to the Koopaling's article. It's just that I don't like having a plural word like 'Koopalings' paired with only one singular name like Morton's. It's that kind of grammar that really gets me mad. --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 11:36, 25 July 2016 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ::::As Mario jc just told you we cannot change something just because it aggravates you (or any user for that matter). Morton Jr. was confirmed so he stays. If another Koopaling gets confirmed I assure you we'll add him/her in thanks. {{User:Fawful's Minion/sig}} 20:01, 25 July 2016 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :::::It's not a matter of incorrect grammar. The 's' isn't there because one Koopaling (Morton) is listed. As Mister Wu [[Talk:Paper Mario: Color Splash#Remove Morton Koopa, Jr. from Boss List|stated]], the Koopalings ''as a group'' were confirmed. ''That's'' why it is in plural form. Morton is just listed there because he is part of that group, and the reason he stays is because he is the only one shown, mentioned by name, and confirmed, by Nintendo. {{user:Mario jc/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| == Last Warning ==
| |
|
| |
| {{last warning}}
| |
| No more false information okay [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Paper_Mario:_Color_Splash&diff=2024351&oldid=2024345 this is not acceptable]. If you are certain you saw it source the site you found it on I don't have to tell you this a zillion times. [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Paper_Mario:_Color_Splash&diff=2018303&oldid=2018299 You've done this many times before] meaning you deserved something stronger than a warning, don't continue this further or you '''will''' be blocked thanks for you cooperation. {{User:Fawful's Minion/sig}} 22:19, 1 August 2016 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ::ARRRGHH!!!!! BLOCK ME UNTIL PAPER MARIO: COLOR SPLASH'S OFFICIAL RELEASE DATE!!! I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE!!! --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 23:11, 1 August 2016 (EDT)
| |
| Hello {{Color|{{PAGENAME}}|green}} please don't alter or remove warnings or comments again, if you do I will get a [[Mariowiki:Admins|Sysop]] involved thanks for your cooperation. {{User:Fawful's Minion/sig}} 23:58, 1 August 2016 (EDT)
| |
| ::Didn't you read my comment on your page or on this page? --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 00:01, 2 August 2016 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Warning ==
| |
|
| |
| {{warning|2=creating stub articles after being given a reminder on it}}
| |
|
| |
| With your recent stub article [[Holo-Peach]], it doesn't appear to me that you're improving, considering that you've already been reminded in the past about creating new stubs. Please allocate more effort in your articles rather than simply writing one or two lines, along with very poor and careless formatting, and then expecting other editors to fill in the holes. Review our [[MarioWiki:Manual of Style|manual of style]]. If you do not have access to resources that can provide you with adequate information, work on something else. Given that you're already blocked, you are already on your way to another ban (likely a ''perma-ban'') from the staff if you do not show improvement ''immediately''. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 00:31, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| :What the HECK is wrong with creating stub articles? I thought they would be good for users to further edit them?! Where in your Rules does it say that Stub Articles are not f'ing allowed?! --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 00:35, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| :[[Mariowiki:Warning Policy|Here]]. {{User:The RPG Gamer/sig}} 00:37, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| ::You know what? I am not a researcher, ok?! I am a speculator! I speculate a lot of things! It's what I do! I am not researcher who spends all his time researching these things! I make speculation articles because I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT THEY DO EXIST! If you think spectulators should be allowed on this wiki, then why not make a rule of it?!--[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 00:48, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| :::Stub articles aren't encouraged because they are so scant in content that they convey virtually no useful information to our readers. They are better off as a red link to show immediately that we have no information on the subject. Our own policy, the [[MarioWiki:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] states the following:
| |
| :::"'''Please do NOT create tiny articles just for the sake of filling in red links. Even if the article you are making is about a minor subject, try to put a decent amount of effort into it rather than a rush job.'''
| |
| :::"'''Newly created stubs will be deleted automatically so try to add a decent amount of information to the page you are creating.'''"
| |
| :::While judgement on what's a stub or not varies from person to person, I concluded that your article is a low effort stub because it is poorly formatted (no categories, game isn't italicized, no navigational template), has only a few sentences and has deliberately empty sections. If you want to create an article, but cannot do so in a single sitting, create your own sandbox page in your userspace, edit from there, and once it looks acceptable for a standalone page, then create the page and copy-paste the content. Or, you can put a decent amount of effort with proper formatting (like categorizing and adding a navigation template) and writing adequate information for at least one or two of the locations of the article subject and then tagging it with {{tem|construction}} and {{tem|image}} if you are unable to obtain an image. What's not acceptable is creating an article that has barely any useful information to convey and expecting editors to fill it in. That's not how article creation is intended to work. Please stop operating on that mindset as it will not take you very far in this wiki. Focus on making an honest effort contributing substantial and useful content if you intend to create articles. We don't need your help "kickstarting" articles since ''anyone'' can create an article.
| |
| :::Even if there isn't a rule on stub creation, saying that "there isn't a rule on it" is not a good counter to [[MarioWiki:Don't shoot your foot off]], especially if several users, including a MarioWiki patroller, has called your action into question. Instead, listen to our advice and warnings and you'll avoid scenes like you're creating right now and you'll avoid getting banned here. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 00:54, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| :::May I just jump in here and say speculation isn't allowed, sorry dude. We need to research this stuff to earn more information on it. Take [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Kenneth_W._James&diff=1961947&oldid=1950566 Lindsay151's interview with Kenny James] for example. (The best voice actor too btw). You need to either research the information or e-mail the subject '''not''' just guessing like "Oh hey my predictions are right." But you have so very little info to go off of. I mean yeah I'm not trying to be rude but this site needs proof, all the info here needs to be fully accurate. Also stubs are allowed on certain cases when very little info is known about the subject like [[Caety Sagoian|here]] but I may interview this particular subject someday to expand the page. Either way, please don't speculate here again unless it's true. Thanks. {{User:The RPG Gamer/sig}} 00:56, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| When I created [[List of Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam pre-release and unused content]], I just took the information from Paper Jam and moved it to the article with no changes and created a link to the page. The only difference between the article I created and the article you created is the amount of information collected before the creation. Under different circumstances and users, articles created just to fill red links may or may not warrant a warning to a user (I looked at the rules). The end doesn't always justify the means. It is how the means are used. Please don't add articles that have little to no information that you know about them. One last thing, do you have the game, or are you just interested in it? In the formal case, you can easily work on expanding the article. In the latter case, try finding a YouTube Video. If you want to be lazy and not do it, tell me here. {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 01:30, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| :I need help with the Holo-Peach article. I only just got started on it and I didn't have enough time to finish it, ok? That's why I left it a stub. I do not have the game because I do not have the Wii U. I don't even know if it will be playable on the new Nintendo Switch.--[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 01:44, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| :I mean you could've just said that instead of speculating, we're here to help. I've actually played the game so I may be able to expand the page and maybe add an image. :) {{User:The RPG Gamer/sig}} 01:46, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| ::I didn't think to use the Summary Option. :( The rules didn't say anything about using the Summary Option to ask for help, did it?--[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 01:49, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| :::I may rewatch some YouTube Videos to find out about the Holo-Peach starting when I get my college homework done, but if you just need help researching, the YouTube videos I watched were uploaded by Packattack04082. (note that I don't watch all of his videos.) They should help you out. {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 01:51, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| As I said, if you don't have time to finish an article you're working on, you're always welcome to create a userspace sandbox page and work on it as much as you want. Once it looks like a solid article, then you can create the page and copy-paste from there. I don't think anyone's going to take your work, but if they do, just accept it and move on. And if you don't have the necessary information to create a substantial article, don't feel obligated to create it. Nothing is in a rush here. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 01:54, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| :But I don't have a user sandobx. :( --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 01:58, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| ::Well, it's easy. Just create it as if you're creating an article, but it's a userspace subpage. Like this: [[User:LTIan/sandbox]]. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 02:01, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| ::::@LTIan To your question about summaries. Yes you can use the summary. It isn't required but it helps other users understand the changes I.e why some info was removed. I discussed this with the owner of this site {{User|Porplemontage}} [[User talk:Porplemontage#Edit summary reminder|here]]. {{User:The RPG Gamer/sig}} 02:02, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| :::::Will a tab at the top of my userpage with the same sandbox link? {{unsigned|LTIan}}
| |
| :Tap LeftyGreenMario's link she displayed for you. {{User:The RPG Gamer/sig}} 02:05, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| ::What link?--[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 02:15, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| ::LTIan: There won't be an additional tab at the top of your userpage, but you can give yourself easy access to your userspace sandbox by linking it in your userpage or typing the name User:LTIan/sandbox (once it is created) in the search bar. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 02:07, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| ::I see your sandbox. I know you're afraid of losing access to it, but it's going to be always there. Just type [[User:LTIan/sandbox]] in the search bar and hit enter OR link it in your userpace so it's just a click or two away. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 02:15, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
| :Okay 1 LTIan, put your comments at the bottom of the section and 2 the link in her message this one [[User:LTIan/Sandbox]] < click on this one (the one where my arrow is pointing. Click on that link and create the page; I hope this helps. :) {{User:The RPG Gamer/sig}} 04:05, 19 November 2016 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| :::I have a better idea. :) I'm gonna go make a "Sandbox Land" of my own. I call it "Sandbox Land" to make it fit with the theme of both Mario Series and the Wiki Sandbox. That way, if I ever need to go to make stub articles, My Sandbox Land will be the place to go. --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 20:49, 29 January 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Done. :) My Sandbox is all set up and ready. I added a link to my Sand Box on my user page. --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 21:06, 29 January 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Last warning==
| |
| {{last warning}}
| |
|
| |
| It has become clear to me (and many other users) that your conduct is unacceptable by posting comments intended for disruption in this wiki. Normally, we don't expect all users to love this wiki or agree with how our discipline works, but you have a dubious history that makes you unreliable and untrustworthy. As I see your past conduct, which has included posting disruptive, inflammatory remarks to other users, you have not improved from it at any sort. You have used up all your chances. As I warned, make a single mistake one more time, and you will be banned, likely perma-banned. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 14:16, 2 December 2016 (EST)
| |
| ::What have I done wrong? :( --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 14:20, 2 December 2016 (EST)
| |
| :::see [[User talk:Shokora#Disturbing Userpage]].
| |
| ::::My main user page? That's the problem that led to this? I'll fix it. :( --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 14:29, 2 December 2016 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == If I get perma-banned... ==
| |
|
| |
| In the event that if I should ever get perma-banned, I want one of the following messages to be shown:<br />
| |
|
| |
| -"GO AWAY AND DON'T COME BACK!"<br />
| |
| -"GET OUT AND STAY OUT!"<br />
| |
| -"WE DON'T WANT YOU AROUND HERE ANYMORE!"<br />
| |
| -"STAY OFF OF THIS WIKI AND NEVER COME BACK! EVER!"<br />
| |
|
| |
| The reason I am suggesting this is because no matter what I do or where I go on this wiki, I am always somehow breaking the wiki's strict rules. I thought that this wiki was a fun wiki where we could create our own articles. :( But now I see that I have been wrong all this time.<br />
| |
|
| |
| I am sorry for everything I've done and I know what you're all thinking: "None of this would have ever happened if I had never registered onto this wiki". :(<br />
| |
|
| |
| And truthfully, you're right. :(<br />
| |
|
| |
| So should if I get perma-banned, then I would like one of those messages to be set up for the Perma-Ban Message if it happens. --[[User:LTIan|LTIan]] ([[User talk:LTIan|talk]]) 16:00, 2 December 2016 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| First of all, I highly doubt any of those four messages will be placed by the admins. It looks rude, it's unnecessary and doesn't explain why your were banned.<br>
| |
| Second, don't just give up and decide you are the worst user ever when you make a mistake. Learn form your mistakes and strive to be better. There have been far worse users than you. Trust me, I know.<br>
| |
| This wiki does allow you to make your own articles. But there's no point in making an article with barely any information. Either get more information or ask someone else if they have any. If those fail, there probably isn't enough info for the subject to have its own article.<br>
| |
| The rules are there for good reasons. Yes, they're strict. Yes, they can be hard to follow. But they are necessary if we want to have the best quality wiki possible. If you disagree, you need to look at the opposing arguments. I'm sure all the wiki staff (admins, patrollers and such) and the majority of users understand and agree with the rules. I completely understand if the rules are too complex and strict for you, but there's no point in having an account here if you don't like the way we do things.<br>
| |
| Don't openly say that you hate the Super Mario Wiki or compare us to the wikia. That's like walking into a fancy restaurant and shouting to the heavens that McDonalds is better. Even if it's true, it's mean and you shouldn't do it. If you like the wikia better, fine, use that one instead. But don't come here and say this wiki is bad. It's just impolite.<br>
| |
| As for speculation, that's not what wikis are for. Out job is to stat cold, hard facts, not personal opinions because anyone can have their own opinion. I'm not saying you can't have opions, I'm saying you can't put them on articles. If you want to state your opinions, that's what the forums are for. I'm not interested in them, but that might be just the place for you.<br>
| |
| Please think on this. Stop beating yourself up.<br>
| |
| {{User:Ultimate Mr. L/sig}} 16:45, 2 December 2016 (EST)
| |
| :You know, you keep complaining about strict rules, but our "strict" rules is how we got far in this wiki and why we're more searched for than the other Mario Wikia, since it has less quality control (every time you search for a Mario-related game, this wiki always shows up first above the Mario Wikia). We put up these rules mostly for satisfying our audience's purpose for being here: searching for quality information related to the Mario series. Also this should be common to ANY community if it isn't MarioWiki: you've been banned mostly because you've been throwing temper tantrums over disputed edits from other users who also think they are doing the wiki a favor, rather than standing your ground and affirming why your edits are valid instead of complaining about how we run here. How you react to anyone disputing your information is generally considered to be inappropriate and immature.
| |
|
| |
| :Furthermore, you're digging yourself deeper in the hole by attempting to make a scene of your recent Last Warning because of your inappropriate user page and history, rather than accepting your Last Warning, learning from it, and ''moving on''. None of the administrators will accept any of your "requests" should you get permabanned, because what you're requesting is inappropriate conduct of the administration.
| |
|
| |
| :I'd like to clarify here that ''none'' of us here want to beat you down. None of us here want to see you banned. But if you continue acting like this, we have no choice but to reprimand you for inappropriate conduct because you're still breaking established rules that we've put up for, again, quality control. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 17:21, 2 December 2016 (EST)
| |
| ::Thank you, Baby Luigi. That's partly what I was trying to say. Nobody here wishes you had never joined, nobody is issuing warnings because they're trying to be mean, and the rules have been there for many, many years and the wiki is doing quite well. It's your behavior that needs to improve, not the wiki's.
| |
| ::{{User:Ultimate Mr. L/sig}} 17:32, 2 December 2016 (EST)
| |
| :::I don't like being blunt like this, especially towards users who have genuine intentions of being a helpful user; I don't care as much compared to vandals and morons who think it's funny to blank out pages with bad words. We gave you chances because we care about you, and we want you to become a better user; we can't be all kind and nice if you break rules that need to be enforced though. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 17:40, 2 December 2016 (EST)
| |
