Editing User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 284: | Line 284: | ||
::::[[MarioWiki:References#References to other games and references in later games]]. If an intentional connection is clear (e.g. the ones with Bluster), it's a reference; if there's no proof of one, it doesn't get added. That's all; there's no subjectivity. I've removed the ''DK64'' one since there doesn't seem to be proof anywhere of those being "nods". {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 04:32, November 5, 2019 (EST) | ::::[[MarioWiki:References#References to other games and references in later games]]. If an intentional connection is clear (e.g. the ones with Bluster), it's a reference; if there's no proof of one, it doesn't get added. That's all; there's no subjectivity. I've removed the ''DK64'' one since there doesn't seem to be proof anywhere of those being "nods". {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 04:32, November 5, 2019 (EST) | ||
"Same method", especially something as general as standing on a shell, doesn't automatically make it a reference. Please read through MW:References again. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 21:03, March 14, 2020 (EDT) | "Same method", especially something as general as standing on a shell, doesn't automatically make it a reference. Please read through MW:References again. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 21:03, March 14, 2020 (EDT) | ||
== RE: Peach Explorer Outfit == | == RE: Peach Explorer Outfit == | ||
Line 331: | Line 328: | ||
== Ice Mario == | == Ice Mario == | ||
{{ | {{lastwarn}} | ||
What you have repeatedly attempted to add [[Special:Diff/2849833|here]] unfortunately can't stay, since those mentions have nothing to do with the form that the article's subject is about. The ''Super Mario Galaxy 2'' info '''might''' be able to go into trivia, but the ''Mario Golf: World Tour'' info goes into the [[Ice Flower]] article instead, and the ''Mario Tennis Aces'' info doesn't need to be mentioned at all because of how "obvious" it is. Keep in mind that you've been warned about edit warring multiple times in the past, and so consider this your final warning; any more edit wars you participate in '''will''' result in a block. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 14:12, January 17, 2020 (EST) | What you have repeatedly attempted to add [[Special:Diff/2849833|here]] unfortunately can't stay, since those mentions have nothing to do with the form that the article's subject is about. The ''Super Mario Galaxy 2'' info '''might''' be able to go into trivia, but the ''Mario Golf: World Tour'' info goes into the [[Ice Flower]] article instead, and the ''Mario Tennis Aces'' info doesn't need to be mentioned at all because of how "obvious" it is. Keep in mind that you've been warned about edit warring multiple times in the past, and so consider this your final warning; any more edit wars you participate in '''will''' result in a block. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 14:12, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ||
:Hey, I was trying to do the best of what I can and many people kept disregarding me even if it fitted or not, all because of many debates with different agreement issues, why do I need to be the only one to warned for!? That's really unfair...Because Doc von Schmeltwick was edit warring as well, even if you don't agree with it. You are basically over powering your admin status just to frame me out. I don't even care if you block me, even if you really hate what I'm saying here. Just do it if you are really wanting too. I'm doing the best I can and I realize I'm not perfect but I want to help but you know what, but I don't think I'm needed here after all since people want to conflict me so many times, even if no one cares. --[[User:Gamermakerguy|Gamermakerguy]] ([[User talk:Gamermakerguy|talk]]) 14:37, January 17, 2020 (EST) | :Hey, I was trying to do the best of what I can and many people kept disregarding me even if it fitted or not, all because of many debates with different agreement issues, why do I need to be the only one to warned for!? That's really unfair...Because Doc von Schmeltwick was edit warring as well, even if you don't agree with it. You are basically over powering your admin status just to frame me out. I don't even care if you block me, even if you really hate what I'm saying here. Just do it if you are really wanting too. I'm doing the best I can and I realize I'm not perfect but I want to help but you know what, but I don't think I'm needed here after all since people want to conflict me so many times, even if no one cares. --[[User:Gamermakerguy|Gamermakerguy]] ([[User talk:Gamermakerguy|talk]]) 14:37, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ||
Line 486: | Line 483: | ||
I was going to explain the edit after I was done for the day but didn't have time. If you want someone to understand the point you're trying to get across, I would suggest not writing a giant wall of really hard-to-read text expecting them to have the time to read it all. From what I can tell, it seems like you're just overanalysing and reaching in trying to find a connection between the Shady Koopas and underground Koopas without it being as obvious as the Gloombas and underground Goombas, when the point behind the edit was that the Koopas look similar, when they clearly don't ([[File:SMB NES Blue Koopa Troopa Walking.gif|30px]][[File:Sky Blue Troopa.png|30px]]) in the same way the Goombas do ([[File:SMBBlueGoomba.gif|30px]][[File:PMTTYDGloomba.png|30px]]). Even if it's possible they intended for it to be what a Koopa looks like in shade, it could have been a design separate from underground Koopas since they hardly look similar. If its shell was as dark as the Gloombas and it had darker skin as opposed to paler/desaturated-coloured skin (I disagree it would have blended in with the collar and sunglasses), then I'd agree it'd look similar or even be a reference. The ''SSBU'' Piranha Plant costume similarity is notable because they would have likely based any of the seven alternate costumes on something (as most costumes are), and the underground Piranha Plants would be the closest. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 22:44, May 16, 2023 (EDT) | I was going to explain the edit after I was done for the day but didn't have time. If you want someone to understand the point you're trying to get across, I would suggest not writing a giant wall of really hard-to-read text expecting them to have the time to read it all. From what I can tell, it seems like you're just overanalysing and reaching in trying to find a connection between the Shady Koopas and underground Koopas without it being as obvious as the Gloombas and underground Goombas, when the point behind the edit was that the Koopas look similar, when they clearly don't ([[File:SMB NES Blue Koopa Troopa Walking.gif|30px]][[File:Sky Blue Troopa.png|30px]]) in the same way the Goombas do ([[File:SMBBlueGoomba.gif|30px]][[File:PMTTYDGloomba.png|30px]]). Even if it's possible they intended for it to be what a Koopa looks like in shade, it could have been a design separate from underground Koopas since they hardly look similar. If its shell was as dark as the Gloombas and it had darker skin as opposed to paler/desaturated-coloured skin (I disagree it would have blended in with the collar and sunglasses), then I'd agree it'd look similar or even be a reference. The ''SSBU'' Piranha Plant costume similarity is notable because they would have likely based any of the seven alternate costumes on something (as most costumes are), and the underground Piranha Plants would be the closest. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 22:44, May 16, 2023 (EDT) | ||