Editing User talk:Ghost Jam
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Even if it was in Nintendo Power, fan art is fan art, so out the window it goes. I think we got all the copies. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 21:57, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | :::Even if it was in Nintendo Power, fan art is fan art, so out the window it goes. I think we got all the copies. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 21:57, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
OK then. Now onto a different subject. Can you restore [[:File:DonkeyKongMrMen.jpg]] and tag it with {{tem|image-quality}} instead? I was debating how to insert it into [[List of references in animated television]], unless the ape isn't [[Donkey Kong]] being referenced. Just not sure how to insert it. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:03, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | OK then. Now onto a different subject. Can you restore [[:File:DonkeyKongMrMen.jpg]] and tag it with {{tem|image-quality}} instead? I was debating how to insert it into [[List of Mario references in animated television]], unless the ape isn't [[Donkey Kong]] being referenced. Just not sure how to insert it. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:03, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
:I deleted it mostly because it seemed like a generic "giant monkey does a thing" image, but, as requested, I'll leave that up to editorial discretion. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 22:06, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | :I deleted it mostly because it seemed like a generic "giant monkey does a thing" image, but, as requested, I'll leave that up to editorial discretion. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 22:06, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
::Where is that discussion taking place? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:08, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | ::Where is that discussion taking place? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:08, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
:::'Editorial discretion' is diplomatic code for 'whatever body of people that is working the relevant articles will figure out how useful this image is'. So, since you made the request, the discussion is taking place wherever you start it. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 22:10, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | :::'Editorial discretion' is diplomatic code for 'whatever body of people that is working the relevant articles will figure out how useful this image is'. So, since you made the request, the discussion is taking place wherever you start it. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 22:10, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
::::OK, thanks. [[Talk:List of references in animated television]] it is. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:11, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | ::::OK, thanks. [[Talk:List of Mario references in animated television]] it is. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:11, 24 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
== Chains == | == Chains == | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
I've been combing through the proposal page's history for a recently passed proposal, and I noticed [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Proposals&diff=1896685&oldid=1896599 a proposal] that you withdrew with the following reason: "Removed proposal, subject was of a technical nature and impossible to implement. This is an administrative deletion and should not be added to the formal archive." Forgive me if I'm wrong, but aren't all proposals supposed to be archived, per rule 12? There are quite a few other proposals that were vetoed by admins but were still archived. I haven't seen the term "administrative deletion" used for any other proposal either. Would it be an issue if I were to add it into the proposal archives? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 16:40, 10 September 2017 (EDT) | I've been combing through the proposal page's history for a recently passed proposal, and I noticed [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Proposals&diff=1896685&oldid=1896599 a proposal] that you withdrew with the following reason: "Removed proposal, subject was of a technical nature and impossible to implement. This is an administrative deletion and should not be added to the formal archive." Forgive me if I'm wrong, but aren't all proposals supposed to be archived, per rule 12? There are quite a few other proposals that were vetoed by admins but were still archived. I haven't seen the term "administrative deletion" used for any other proposal either. Would it be an issue if I were to add it into the proposal archives? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 16:40, 10 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
:There are a few other instances of 'administrative deletion', but yeah. At one time, Walkazo had the thought to remove proposals that tried to dick with hard and fast rules as a sort of 'see this? No.'. It was after the one you linked there that she changed her mind. So, yeah, basically, rule 12, feel free to archive. -- {{User:Ghost Jam/sig}} 21:38, 13 September 2017 (EDT) | :There are a few other instances of 'administrative deletion', but yeah. At one time, Walkazo had the thought to remove proposals that tried to dick with hard and fast rules as a sort of 'see this? No.'. It was after the one you linked there that she changed her mind. So, yeah, basically, rule 12, feel free to archive. -- {{User:Ghost Jam/sig}} 21:38, 13 September 2017 (EDT) | ||