Editing User talk:Ghost Jam

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 7: Line 7:
:::Even if it was in Nintendo Power, fan art is fan art, so out the window it goes. I think we got all the copies. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 21:57, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
:::Even if it was in Nintendo Power, fan art is fan art, so out the window it goes. I think we got all the copies. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 21:57, 24 May 2016 (EDT)


OK then. Now onto a different subject. Can you restore [[:File:DonkeyKongMrMen.jpg]] and tag it with {{tem|image-quality}} instead? I was debating how to insert it into [[List of references in animated television]], unless the ape isn't [[Donkey Kong]] being referenced. Just not sure how to insert it. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:03, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
OK then. Now onto a different subject. Can you restore [[:File:DonkeyKongMrMen.jpg]] and tag it with {{tem|image-quality}} instead? I was debating how to insert it into [[List of Mario references in animated television]], unless the ape isn't [[Donkey Kong]] being referenced. Just not sure how to insert it. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:03, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
:I deleted it mostly because it seemed like a generic "giant monkey does a thing" image, but, as requested, I'll leave that up to editorial discretion. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 22:06, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
:I deleted it mostly because it seemed like a generic "giant monkey does a thing" image, but, as requested, I'll leave that up to editorial discretion. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 22:06, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
::Where is that discussion taking place? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:08, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
::Where is that discussion taking place? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:08, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
:::'Editorial discretion' is diplomatic code for 'whatever body of people that is working the relevant articles will figure out how useful this image is'. So, since you made the request, the discussion is taking place wherever you start it. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 22:10, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
:::'Editorial discretion' is diplomatic code for 'whatever body of people that is working the relevant articles will figure out how useful this image is'. So, since you made the request, the discussion is taking place wherever you start it. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 22:10, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
::::OK, thanks. [[Talk:List of references in animated television]] it is. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:11, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
::::OK, thanks. [[Talk:List of Mario references in animated television]] it is. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:11, 24 May 2016 (EDT)


== Chains ==
== Chains ==
Line 85: Line 85:
I've been combing through the proposal page's history for a recently passed proposal, and I noticed [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Proposals&diff=1896685&oldid=1896599 a proposal] that you withdrew with the following reason: "Removed proposal, subject was of a technical nature and impossible to implement. This is an administrative deletion and should not be added to the formal archive." Forgive me if I'm wrong, but aren't all proposals supposed to be archived, per rule 12? There are quite a few other proposals that were vetoed by admins but were still archived. I haven't seen the term "administrative deletion" used for any other proposal either. Would it be an issue if I were to add it into the proposal archives? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 16:40, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
I've been combing through the proposal page's history for a recently passed proposal, and I noticed [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Proposals&diff=1896685&oldid=1896599 a proposal] that you withdrew with the following reason: "Removed proposal, subject was of a technical nature and impossible to implement. This is an administrative deletion and should not be added to the formal archive." Forgive me if I'm wrong, but aren't all proposals supposed to be archived, per rule 12? There are quite a few other proposals that were vetoed by admins but were still archived. I haven't seen the term "administrative deletion" used for any other proposal either. Would it be an issue if I were to add it into the proposal archives? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 16:40, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
:There are a few other instances of 'administrative deletion', but yeah. At one time, Walkazo had the thought to remove proposals that tried to dick with hard and fast rules as a sort of 'see this? No.'. It was after the one you linked there that she changed her mind. So, yeah, basically, rule 12, feel free to archive. -- {{User:Ghost Jam/sig}} 21:38, 13 September 2017 (EDT)
:There are a few other instances of 'administrative deletion', but yeah. At one time, Walkazo had the thought to remove proposals that tried to dick with hard and fast rules as a sort of 'see this? No.'. It was after the one you linked there that she changed her mind. So, yeah, basically, rule 12, feel free to archive. -- {{User:Ghost Jam/sig}} 21:38, 13 September 2017 (EDT)
== Invalid...? ==
Hi, I know your vote on [[Talk:Frog#Split Frog and cut down on its genericness, part 2|this proposal I initiated]] '''used''' to be valid due to the proposal being rushed out and having an overflow of options as a result at the time, but now it's not since I learned from some of my mistakes and changed it again to just featuring three options. Is it okay if I just go ahead and strike through it? {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 22:34, 22 December 2018 (EST)
== Loading Area image ==
The glitch it was showing was how held objects change if taken into a different loading area, it was inexplicably removed after that page got an overhaul. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 00:17, April 30, 2019 (EDT)
:Bring it up on the talk page for Mario 64 glitches as to why it was deleted in the first place. -- {{User:Ghost Jam/sig}} 00:23, April 30, 2019 (EDT)
::Pretty sure it's been brought up there, it's just never really gotten a full response. The entire page was restructured due to trying to be in line with findings of YouTuber Pannenkoek, so it was probably just an oversight. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 00:24, April 30, 2019 (EDT)
:::Well, if you intend to reinstate the missing section, I can restore the image for it. -- {{User:Ghost Jam/sig}} 00:27, April 30, 2019 (EDT)
== Hi ==
Hello. I hear you help with any matter on the wiki. I need some help and some people have not responded to me about edits I cannot make myself. Would you be willing to assist me? If so, please reply to me on my talk page. [[User:Lord Falafel|Lord Falafel]] ([[User talk:Lord Falafel|talk]]) 20:38, July 13, 2019 (EDT)

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)