| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{block|reason=editing other users' comments and reuploading images wrongly, after being told not to do so without discussing it first, sockpuppeting during a temporary block, and impersonating an administrator}}
| |
|
| |
| {{reminder|2=undoing an edit by an admin}} | | {{reminder|2=undoing an edit by an admin}} |
| YOu '''cannot''' undo an edit by [[User:Porplemontage]], an admin ''and'' the site's founder. If you do it again you ''will'' get blocked. | | YOu '''cannot''' undo an edit by [[User:Porplemontage]], an admin ''and'' the site's founder. If you do it again you ''will'' get blocked. |
| Line 11: |
Line 9: |
| :They are banjo images but they are just artwork ones from banjo kazooie series and they can belong here.--[[User:Brandondorf9999|Brandondorf9999]] 21:39, 20 July 2011 (EDT) | | :They are banjo images but they are just artwork ones from banjo kazooie series and they can belong here.--[[User:Brandondorf9999|Brandondorf9999]] 21:39, 20 July 2011 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| {{last warning}} | | {{lastwarn}} |
| *Stop uploading Banjo images that are not Mario related. Continue to do so, and I may have to block you. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 21:41, 20 July 2011 (EDT) | | *Stop uploading Banjo images that are not Mario related. Continue to do so, and I may have to block you. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 21:41, 20 July 2011 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| Line 27: |
Line 25: |
|
| |
|
| *You can only display hacked images if they're involved with beta elements. For example, [[:File:SMBWGiantBuzzy.png]] is a hacked image, but it's to show an enemy which was never used in the final version of ''New Super Mario Bros. Wii''. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 19:01, 21 July 2011 (EDT) | | *You can only display hacked images if they're involved with beta elements. For example, [[:File:SMBWGiantBuzzy.png]] is a hacked image, but it's to show an enemy which was never used in the final version of ''New Super Mario Bros. Wii''. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 19:01, 21 July 2011 (EDT) |
|
| |
| ===Subspace Emissary===
| |
| *You reverted [[:File:FalseDiddy.png]] back to a revision that isn't really acceptable. You see, the 1280x720 pixel revision is what the image actually looks like when viewed on the Dolphin Emulator. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 23:36, 28 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *Listen, if you're using the Dolphin Emulator to take Subspace Emissary screenshots of the cutscenes, no cropping. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 15:01, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *Your screenshots are too big though, using more than 5 MB, which can be a heavy burden to the Mario Wiki servers. Even SWFlash's screenshots don't go that high; usually less than 3 MB. I'll probably have to talk this over with the other admins. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 15:32, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *Regardless, I'm mentioning your actions on the forums to see if it's going to cut it or not. If not, then expect your revisions to be reverted. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 15:42, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *Okay, I did get a response from Glowsquid, and he recommends that you compress your large images before uploading them. There are a couple ways to reduce the size of PNG images, which includes removing alpha layers, indexing (not recommended for screenshots), or using the PNG Monster program to do the compressing. Until you learn to compress your large images, the smaller revisions will be used instead. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 17:44, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *A quick compression won't be as effective as a full compression. You need to use the highest compression setting to ensure that the image's file size will be greatly reduced. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 19:04, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *I fully compressed two of your revisions; your revision for [[:File:FalseDiddy.png]] now uses around 2.08 MB, instead of around 4.87 MB. Now, I highly suggest that you download the PNG Monster before you continue your large image spree. Google it if you have to. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 19:38, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *Your False Diddy revision did take around 15 minutes to fully compress. That's the price for fully compressing PNG images, but it's worth it in the end. On a side note, my revisions don't lose that much memory when they're fully compressed, since they were made with the assistance of The GIMP. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 19:45, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *I looked at your Smash Wiki history, and I must say that it's rather poor. Apparently your uploads got reverted because they were too large. Listen to Goomba's Shoe15's words if I were you. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 20:09, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ===Vandal Issues===
| |
| *Listen, I am not very pleased with your actions. I may have helped you with compressing your images, but if the other users think my revisions are better, then I'm on their side. Besides, your actions on the SmashWiki are telling me that you're not trustworthy. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 21:37, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *You're not making things better by arguing with me. Walkazo already gave you a warning, so I expect you to change your actions. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 22:06, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ===Image Revisions===
| |
| *It's not a good idea to be tampering with game screenshots. The images you get from the games should stay as they are; for example, no brightness adjusting. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 17:28, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *I gave a message to SWFlash to see if he can cover the screenshots that you updated. Besides, some of your revisions were also reverted by Lindsay151. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 17:41, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
| |
| *Either way, I still contacted SWFlash to see if he can do better. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 18:23, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Fan art == | | == Fan art == |
| Line 74: |
Line 52: |
|
| |
|
| If an admin says don't crop out the bars than don't crop out the bars {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | | If an admin says don't crop out the bars than don't crop out the bars {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} |
| :No no your not your not correct here and your not correct on the smashwiki {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}}
| |
| ::You may have to go look up [[wikipedia:Aspect ratio|aspect ratio]] in Wikipedia. It will tell you more about them.{{unsigned|Brandondorf9999}}
| |
| :Wrong ratio. Thats about shape ratios. [[User:WikiofSmash|WikiofSmash "I love the smell of facepalm in the morning."]] 23:48, 28 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| :::Or i mean this [[wikipedia:Aspect ratio (image)|one]]. This one will tell you more about it.--[[User:Brandondorf9999|Brandondorf9999]] 23:53, 28 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == What you did on admin noticeboard ==
| |
|
| |
| was unacceptable. Don't try it here, in case you were going too. [[User:Dr.Wario|Dr.Wario ''Matching vitamins since never.'']] 23:04, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Threat to UltraMario3000 ==
| |
|
| |
| Don't '''EVER''' tell a user a they'll get blocked when they clearly aren't. At this rate, the tables may turn on you. [[User:Dr.Wario|Dr.Wario ''Matching vitamins since never.'']] 21:20, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| :See? I was right↓ [[User:Dr.Wario|Dr.Wario ''Matching vitamins since never.'']] 21:31, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==Warning==
| |
| {{warning||edit warring}}
| |
| If four separate users are reverting your uploads, that's not an indication that they're vandals, but that ''you're'' the one making nonconstructive changes to the wiki. Continuously reverting their undoings of your uploads (and making threatening summaries to boot) is a form of edit warring, and is unacceptable behaviour: keep it up, and ''you'' will be the one who's blocked. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 21:28, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| You will not report them anywhere because they did not cause the war: ''you did'' by repeatedly undoing their reversions. M&SG and GoombaShoe15 both talked to you about why your uploads weren't so great, but you obviously didn't take very much heed, because you kept on making changes that had to be reverted. If people restore things to the way they were before you changed them, bring it to the talk page to see why they did so and explain why you think your way is better, don't just re-make the changes and threaten to get them in trouble. And, since you didn't listen to me either and, once again, re-uploaded some files that the others reverted, here's a last warning:
| |
|
| |
| {{last warning||edit warring}}
| |
| I'm serious, if you re-upload ''one more file'' without talking it over with the others and coming to an agreement ''first'', you will be blocked for two weeks. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 22:24, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Vandal? ==
| |
|
| |
| Reverting images isn't vandalizing. [[User:Dr.Wario|Dr.Wario ''Matching vitamins since never.'']] 20:05, 31 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==Warning==
| |
| {{Warning|2=editing other users' comments}}
| |
| {{User:Bop1996/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| :Be that as it may, editing other users' comments is not allowed under any circumstances I believe. I'll leave whether you need a block or not up to the admins; I'm only concerned with the editing of the comment. {{User:Bop1996/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| ::Yes, it's not allowed (unless you're fixing coding or upholding no-sig policies, but that's not the case here). Anyway, since Branondorf9999 received a Last Warning, these latest infractions (editing another user's comment, as well as reuploading images wrongly, sometimes repeatedly, after being told explicitly to talk about it first) earn him a Block, not just another Warning. Since he was already blocked once, the new block is ''three months'' long. The next block will be indefinite. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 22:16, 4 October 2011 (EDT)
| |
