View source for User talk:Booster

{| class="infobox" style="float:right;border:black double 1px;background-color:#fdfdff;padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em 0.5em 1em;width:270px"
|-
! align="center" | '''[[User talk:Booster|Booster Talk]]'''
----
|-
|
*'''[[User talk:Booster/Archive 1|Archive 1 (1-50)]]'''
|}

== Venus Fire Trap ==

Maybe you could upload a venus fire trap cartoon from the episode ''Tag Team trouble'' from TAoSMB3.{{User:Fg/sig}}

Can you also upload a spark cartoon image?{{User:Fg/sig}}

== I'm not  ==

Trying to overwhelm you but can you upload a single albatoss and a tweeter in their regular appearance?{{User:Fg/sig}}

==Brawling in Brawl==
Hey Booster, my FC is 3866-7707-1966 for Brawl. Don't bother sending me yours, cuz I see it on your page. Maybe we could fight not this weekend, but the next weekend?? {{User:Glitchman/sig}}

==About the forum==

Hey, booster, I can't get the antibot thing on the forums. I put in the right answer, but it always comes out wrong. 
ps. I never got my activation email for the actual wiki. my email is zmcginley@cts-bethesda.com. just be sure that you don't give my email to anyone else. please email me with your reply.

== Proposal deletion? ==

Somebody keeps deleting my proposal about making character pages have content that other Mario character pages have.  I'd rather not do it by my self but...

Sincerely,
Nintendofan146

I'm sorry, but you've confused mii further... Should I just go do what my proposal said?

:Seriously, when would you want to fight?? {{User:Glitchman/sig}}
::Would about 1 and a half hours be OK, cuz I'm supposed to be doing homework now. {{User:Glitchman/sig}} BTW, I'd prefer if you post messages on my current talk page.
:::Cool :P {{User:Glitchman/sig}}
::::Good matches :D  I can't believe I lost so many..but I will return!!  And sorry I left, didn't mean to be a sore loser or anything but I had to go to dinner.  We'll have to have a rematch sometime!! {{User:Glitchman/sig}}

==Stub?==
Is there some rule that all stubs become deleted? As you did to [[Peel Out]] and [[Stump Change]]? Those were mini-games from MP7. Besides, there was a proposal about that allowing those pages, remember? {{User:Garlic Man/sig}}
:Oh, ok. Well, I just thought that ''someone'' would have to start it, because those articles had 88 pages linking to them. Oh well. I don't have the game, so I can't really "put an effort" into it, either. And no, I ''was not'' doing it to increase my article tally, Booster. Articles are better off gone than short, I suppose. Anyway, thanks for clearing it up, though.{{USer:Garlic Man/sig}}

== that user... ==

look at {{user|sockpuppet 18}}. obviously might be a sockpuppet of another similar account. {{User:Coincollector/sig}} 00:53, 25 April 2008 (EDT) looks so suspicious :[

== Could you give me a hand? ==

Hello Booster this is my first request to you (or anyone else) but I was wondering if you could take a look at article "WORLD 2-5 (NSMB)"for me and judge if it is still a stub (if it isn't you can remove the "stub logo"). As you probably know I'm new here and this is my first major edit and I have added a lot of info. If it has sufficient information (or still needs more) please reply on my talk page. 

Thank you so much,
                     [[User:MC Hammer Bro.]]

Hi there! Can I ask you a favor? Can you please talk to Fixitup? We resolved the Baby Daisy conflict on the talk page while he was gone and now he's making a relationship section again on the page, and he's starting to get annoying. He's also saying I'm starting an edit war with him, even though the problem was resolved. {{User:Toadette 4evur/sig}}

== ? ==
Could you please try to pay more attention to what's going on? As you can see, I DID stop continuing Toadette4evur's flame war. They continued it. You can see this as they are the last person to make an edit on the page. It was resolved, and the outcome was us keeping it. Maybe next time you should check up on things a little better. [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]

Is it ok that I removed his comments off my talk page. Also, the resolution I am talking about happened while he was offline. {{User:Toadette 4evur/sig}}
:You can see on the talk page that it hasn't been resolved. It HAD been, until Toadette4evur started an edit war. [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]


Here's what happened: He went offline for a while, then me and some of the other users involved agreed that we could move the Relation article to the trivia. Then when he came back he threw a fit and kept adding the section back, then I contacted you and another Sysop in case one of you was too busy. I stopped after that but he continued contacting people. Then he started making rude comments to me and a friend of mine, so I removed his comments off my talk page, and requested that he not be allowed to comment on my talk page. Then he started saying I was breaking the rules, and here we are now. {{User:Toadette 4evur/sig}}
:That's so off. I didn't throw a fit, and I'm the one that said I was not going to continue in an edit war.  I started contacting more people because Toadette4evur started going around like the more people they told their side of the story to, the more would agree with them without knowing what actually happened. They then removed my comments, which didn't contain any inappropriate commentary, from their talk page. Last time I checked, that IS against the rules. [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
 

Could you block him from my talk page, please? {{User:Toadette 4evur/sig}}

I'm just gonna post here where you'll both see this. The Relationship section is valid. Many other articles have one. If I may ask, what is WRONG with it, Toadette4evur? If you have a vaild point I'll take it into consideration. And no, I can't stop Fixitup from posting on your talk page without blocking him entirely. -- [[User: Booster|Booster]]
:That's ok, I put that I don't want his comments on my talk page in my talk page rules. {{User:Toadette 4evur/sig}}
::The problem with the Relation ship section is that it uses the key words may and unconfirmed. Cobold didn't believe it was valid either. But if I remember right, we don't use unconfirmed info. {{User:Toadette 4evur/sig}}
::That obviously wasn't your problem or you would've just reworded the sections. [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]

::Sorry to bring up old wounds again, but unconfirmed info?! Again, this section isn't the only one unconfirmed. The Daisy and Luigi (just using this as an example) section are unconfirmed too. It makes no sense to delete something for being unconfirmed while you keep even MORE unconfirmed info. Unless you delete every other sliver of unconfirmed/hinted at info/relationships (don't get any ideas) then I still see no problem with keeping this info. As for Cobold saying that, don't be putting words in his mouth. He later said that just because he said it didn't make it true. Thats when we decided to put the info the trivia section.(and why are we discussing this here?) -[[User:Moonshine|Moonshine]]

== World 2-5 (NSMB) ==

I have made a few adjustments to the page. Could you take another look at it please?
[[User:MC Hammer Bro.]]

How'z this? I have merged the two chapters.


Thank you for clearing things up between Fixit and I. I forgot to thank you earlier, so I'm sorry about that. Thanks again. =) {{User:Toadette 4evur/sig}}

== re writing big boo's haunt ==

I have been working on big boo's haunt lately and I was wondering if once I fix a few things ( finish the star missions and probably remove the room list) I can remove the rewrite tab? I have written a lot if you check the history.

[[user:MC Hammer Bro.]]
==Moneybags==
Do you keep moving walking footsteps to moneybags? If you do can you stop it because they are NOT the same thing.