| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| I beg your pardon, but saying that a certain boss is the "Quinary" or "Quaternary" anagonist is far too in-depth, and more importantly, is subjective, as people could have differing opinions regarding the magnitude of each one's role. {{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} 21:13, 30 August 2017 (CT) | | I beg your pardon, but saying that a certain boss is the "Quinary" or "Quaternary" anagonist is far too in-depth, and more importantly, is subjective, as people could have differing opinions regarding the magnitude of each one's role. {{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} 21:13, 30 August 2017 (CT) |
|
| |
|
| Thanks. [[User:Aidanpercussion|Aidanpercussion]] |talk]]) 22:17, 3 September 2017 (EDT) | | Thanks. [[User:Aidanpercussion|Aidanpercussion]] ([[User talk:Aidanpercussion|talk]]) 22:17, 3 September 2017 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| == Warning == | | == Warning == |
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| == Final warning. == | | == Final warning. == |
|
| |
|
| {{last warning}} | | {{lastwarn}} |
| Even though you promised to not use the antagonist terms, you are still using them alongside TV Tropes lingo. It's not too late to fix your mistakes. If you don't start improving, you'll be banned from editing temporarily. – [[User:Owencrazyboy9|Owencrazyboy9]] ([[User talk:Owencrazyboy9|talk]]) 22:30, 3 September 2017 (EDT) | | Even though you promised to not use the antagonist terms, you are still using them alongside TV Tropes lingo. It's not too late to fix your mistakes. If you don't start improving, you'll be banned from editing temporarily. – [[User:Owencrazyboy9|Owencrazyboy9]] ([[User talk:Owencrazyboy9|talk]]) 22:30, 3 September 2017 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| Line 22: |
Line 22: |
|
| |
|
| What am I doing? I don't mean anything bad and feel remorseful. [[User:Aidanpercussion|Aidanpercussion]] ([[User talk:Aidanpercussion|talk]]) 23:06, 4 September 2017 (EDT) | | What am I doing? I don't mean anything bad and feel remorseful. [[User:Aidanpercussion|Aidanpercussion]] ([[User talk:Aidanpercussion|talk]]) 23:06, 4 September 2017 (EDT) |
|
| |
| Just to make sure, which terms shouldn't I be using? [[User:Aidanpercussion|Aidanpercussion]] ([[User talk:Aidanpercussion|talk]]) 23:15, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
| |
| :Anything to do with layers of antagonism. That includes "Quinary," "Quaternary," anything from TVTropes ("The Big Bad," "The Bigger Bad," "The Heavy," etc.), things like that. Especially about non-sapient quartets of Triceratops. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:20, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| You still seem to be having trouble with this, though with a slightly different but related problem. A "main" antagonist is someone that causes trouble for the protagonist throughout the game. In ''[[Super Mario Sunshine]]'', [[Bowser Jr.]] is the main antagonist, not [[Bowser]]. The enemy that is only seen and fought at the end of games would not be a main antagonist (I said "penultimate" in my edit summary, but I don't think that was correct). {{User:Alex95/sig}} 20:23, 12 December 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Thank you. [[User:Aidanpercussion|Aidanpercussion]] ([[User talk:Aidanpercussion|talk]]) 20:26, 12 December 2017 (EST)
| |
| :Actually, yeah, I used that right. Megabug is the penultimate boss, followed by MegaDragonBowser. Neither of them are main antagonists though, just the final ones. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 20:28, 12 December 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| To repeat what's been said to you above, a majority of your contributions has consisted of ranking antagonists by their degree of prominence in the game, some of which have been questionable and incorrect. I ''strongly'' encourage you to contribute to other aspects of the wiki; classifying bosses by order of antagonism in games where it's clear a set order was never intended in the first place is unnecessary and quite frankly adds little to nothing to the article. I also don't feel this is something that warrants an immediate ban, but there are consequences (especially considering you're on a last warning) if the information being added is consistently inaccurate and causing others having to constantly revert them because of that. If you're having doubts about the validity of your edits (as I've noticed you've even had some problems with the terms you're using), simply work on something else. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 20:12, 15 December 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Thank you. [[User:Aidanpercussion|Aidanpercussion]] ([[User talk:Aidanpercussion|talk]]) 22:54, 15 December 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| By the way, you get banned for two weeks if you get blocked the first time. Don't be emboldened by this, because getting blocked in the first place is ''not'' a good thing, but just a heads-up for you to think about. {{User:Lcrossmk8/sig}} 22:57, 15 December 2017 (EST)
| |
