Editing User talk:Ahemtoday

== Regarding the ''Mario is Missing!'' items ==

Considering your massive change to [[Template:MIM]] just now, I'd say yeah, go ahead and move all of the pages that already have articles to their proper titles and/or proper capitalization. I may do some page moves myself, though of course it's always a marathon and never a sprint. {{User:Archivist Toadette/sig}} 02:13, September 2, 2022 (EDT)

:Well, "proper" ought to be in quotation marks. We have "Michelangelo's Paintbrush" and "Rembrandt's paintbrush" in the same game. Also, "mexican tile". [[MarioWiki:Naming#Capitalization|Wiki policy]] seems like we abide by the first two, but we need to change it to "Mexican tile" on the article (though maybe not on the template). [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 02:25, September 2, 2022 (EDT)

== Rename N64 Block Fort and GCN Pipe Plaza to just "Block Fort" and "Pipe Plaza" respectively ==

Given that these battle courses were not given a prefix in-game in Mario Kart DS, on top of the fact that Ninja Hideaway also doesn't have a prefix in-game in Mario Kart 8 Deluxe and was written accordingly on the wiki, I think they shouldn't include their prefixes in their names. [[User:Gold Luigi|Gold Luigi]] ([[User talk:Gold Luigi|talk]]) 15:30, September 9, 2022 (EDT)

== Proposal ==

Hi. I saw the proposal you made. I just want to say that this is very much needed for both the MK8/MK8DX articles & any other games that need this sort of treatment. For your proposal, you have my support. {{SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)/sig}} December 5, 2022 13:22 (CST)
:Er, thanks, but your vote only counts if you put it in the "Support" section on the proposal page. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 14:45, December 5, 2022 (EST)

== Regarding Charlottenburg Palace ==

After my last edit in Berlin Byways, I just realized from the page's history that you intended to create the page of Charlottenburg Palace, yes? When I saw those red links on Berlin Byways, I can't help but to link it back to the Wikipedia article. So, um... I'm wondering if you can leave the links untouched before creating the page next time? Then I wouldn't be mistaken or confused on why the links are going red on purpose and everything. {{User:Starry Windy/sig}} 05:21, December 9, 2022 (EST)
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 After my last edit in Berlin Byways, I just realized from the page's history that you intended to create the page of Charlottenburg Palace, yes? When I saw those red links on Berlin Byways, I can't help but to link it back to the Wikipedia article. So, um... I'm wondering if you can leave the links untouched before creating the page next time? Then I wouldn't be mistaken or confused on why the links are going red on purpose and everything. {{User:Starry Windy/sig}} 05:21, December 9, 2022 (EST)
-== Landmarks ==
-I'm not entirely sure what you mean by your edit summaries while removing the Mario Kart categories from those landmark pages. If you mean that other landmarks that didn't previously appear in Mario is Missing don't receive pages just for appearing in Mario Kart, I still think the categories should be left on the pages, since these subjects are covered and appear in those games. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:48, December 16, 2022 (EST)
-:Yeah, that's what I meant. It leads to an odd situation when looking at the ''Tour'' and ''8 Deluxe'' categories: those games include many landmarks, but only a fraction of them are present on their category pages, and it's not due to anything regarding their ''Mario Kart'' appearances, but instead their appearances in a '''different game'''. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 12:59, December 16, 2022 (EST)
-::Well, regardless of the reasons for coverage, the subjects do appear in those games so they should receive the appropriate categories, so I'm going to revert the edits for now. If you want the categories removed, it should probably be discussed first. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 13:26, December 16, 2022 (EST)
-== Proposal signing ==
-Hi, I'd just like to inform you that you can use {{user|Insert your username here}} to sign on proposals. (Please tap edit to look at the code){{User:WildWario/sig}} 01:38, December 23, 2022 (EST)
-== Template:DDRMM song addition ==
-I've added a music sample parameter to the template since I've already uploaded samples of all the stage music. - [[User:RHG1951|RHG1951]] ([[User talk:RHG1951|talk]]) 22:00, May 18, 2023 (EDT)
-== Proposal cleaned up ==
-I cleaned up [[MarioWiki:Proposals#Broaden the scope of the &lcub;&lcub;unreferenced&rcub;&rcub; template|my proposal]] by adding the <code><nowiki><pre></nowiki></code> tags. You should take a look at what the template will look like from above. What do you think how my proposal looks? {{User:GuntherBB/sig}} 21:01, March 30, 2024 (EDT)
-== The angel ==
-If you undone my edit based on what *you think*, play the ''Mario is Missing'' SNES version. There is a missing artifact for that Angel of Independence called "The angel". {{User:Derekblue1/sig}} 01:57, July 2, 2024 (EDT)
-: Correction for my part, the artifact is referred to as angel, but given by how we name them, it is just called "Angel" XD {{User:Derekblue1/sig}} 02:12, July 2, 2024 (EDT)
-::I '''know''' that. What I '''mean''' is that this is clearly a case where the landmark itself is stolen. This also occurs with the Dome of the Rock and the Damascus Gate. Their artifacts aren't on the navbox not because I don't know what they are, but because the artifacts are one and the same as the landmarks. (Also, please check more than the SNES version. The Angel of Independence is in every version of this game.) [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 02:20, July 2, 2024 (EDT)
-== The waiting time proposal ==
-I ended up canceling right as you made your comment. I invite you to come up with your own method, then. Since it was canceled, you can do so as soon as you like. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:24, September 17, 2024 (EDT)
-:The issue with that is that... well, I don't have any better ideas. A proposal like this inherently needs to draw some distinction between "omnibus" proposals and "normal" proposals, but I don't really think there's a way to do that non-arbitrarily. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 18:43, September 17, 2024 (EDT)