Editing User talk:A gossip-loving Toad

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
  '''STATUS''': see [[User:A gossip-loving Toad|user page]].
  STATUS: final exam week


*[[User talk:A gossip-loving Toad/Archive 1|Archive 1]]
*[[User talk:A gossip-loving Toad/Archive 1|Archive 1]]
Line 15: Line 15:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


If we've got the resources and ability to re-take those screenshots, then I would encourage doing so. Most screenshots on that list page are visibly low in quality, with a lot of JPG compression artefacts. Compare the same {{plain link|1=[http://www.mariowiki.com/images/archive/5/5b/20160417061741%21PM_Star_Piece_KoopaVillageBrick.png JPG]}} and {{plain link|1=[http://www.mariowiki.com/images/5/5b/PM_Star_Piece_KoopaVillageBrick.png PNG]}} screenshot. The latter is definitely sharper, clearer and more ideal. And don't worry about bloating up the file histories: the properly captured PNG version appear to have a [[:File:PM Star Piece KoopaVillageBrick.png|much lower file size]] compared to the JPG. So recapturing the images would also be good for the page's loading time.
If we've got the resources and ability to re-take those screenshots, then I would encourage doing so. Most screenshots on that list page are visibly low in quality, with a lot of JPG compression artefacts. Compare the same {{Plainlink|1=[http://www.mariowiki.com/images/archive/5/5b/20160417061741%21PM_Star_Piece_KoopaVillageBrick.png JPG]}} and {{Plainlink|1=[http://www.mariowiki.com/images/5/5b/PM_Star_Piece_KoopaVillageBrick.png PNG]}} screenshot. The latter is definitely sharper, clearer and more ideal. And don't worry about bloating up the file histories: the properly captured PNG version appear to have a [[:File:PM Star Piece KoopaVillageBrick.png|much lower file size]] compared to the JPG. So recapturing the images would also be good for the page's loading time.


Additionally a captured PNG is definitely preferred over a GIF, due to the limited color palette as Wildgoosespeeder said in the section above. The colors of a GIF Nintendo 64 screenshot wouldn't be accurate to the actual game.
Additionally a captured PNG is definitely preferred over a GIF, due to the limited color palette as Wildgoosespeeder said in the section above. The colors of a GIF Nintendo 64 screenshot wouldn't be accurate to the actual game.
Line 65: Line 65:


Hi, I noticed you were fixing sprite images mistagged as screenshots. There's a few in the Super Mario Maker category...
Hi, I noticed you were fixing sprite images mistagged as screenshots. There's a few in the Super Mario Maker category...
<gallery heights="32" widths="32">
<gallery heights="32" widths="32">
Chibi Robo.png
Chibi Robo.PNG
Diddy KongSMM.png
Diddy KongSMM.PNG
FalcoSMM.png
FalcoSMM.PNG
Foreman SpikeSMM.png
Foreman SpikeSMM.PNG
Ganondorf Super Mario Maker.png
Ganondorf Super Mario Maker.png
Inkling Girl Super Mario Maker.png
Inkling Girl Super Mario Maker.png
JumpmanSMM.png
JumpmanSMM.PNG
Kicks Super Mario Maker.png
Kicks Super Mario Maker.png
Little MacSMM.png
Little MacSMM.PNG
LucasSMM.png
LucasSMM.PNG
Mahjong Super Mario Maker.png
Mahjong Super Mario Maker.png
Mario (GLA) - SMM.png
Mario (GLA) - SMM.png
Mega Man Super Mario Maker.png
Mega Man Super Mario Maker.png
Meta KnightSMM.png
Meta KnightSMM.PNG
Mr GameWatchSMM.png
Mr GameWatchSMM.PNG
Nikki.png
Nikki.PNG
Pac-Man Super Mario Maker.png
Pac-Man Super Mario Maker.png
Peppy Super Mario Maker.png
Peppy Super Mario Maker.png
Pit Updated Super Mario Maker.png
Pit Updated Super Mario Maker.PNG
RobinSMM.png
RobinSMM.PNG
Samus SMM.png
Samus SMM.PNG
ShellcreeperSMM.png
ShellcreeperSMM.PNG
ShulkSMM.png
ShulkSMM.PNG
ShyGuySMM.png
ShyGuySMM.PNG
SideStepper.png
SideStepper.PNG
SMM Blathers.png
SMM Blathers.png
SMM Bowser.png
SMM Bowser.png
Line 99: Line 99:
SMM Dark Pit.png
SMM Dark Pit.png
SMM Digby.png
SMM Digby.png
SMM Donkey Kong Jr Sprite.png
SMM Donkey Kong Jr..png
SMM Donkey Kong.png
SMM Donkey Kong.png
SMM Dr Lobe.png
SMM Dr Lobe.png
SMM Dr Mario.png
SMM Dr. Mario.png
SMM Duck Hunt.png
SMM Duck Hunt.png
SMM Greninja.png
SMM Greninja.png
Line 143: Line 143:
Super Mario Maker Ashley.png
Super Mario Maker Ashley.png
Super Mario Maker Toon Link.png
Super Mario Maker Toon Link.png
Tom NookSMM.png
Tom NookSMM.PNG
ZeldaSMM.png
ZeldaSMM.PNG
</gallery>
</gallery>
- [[User:Reboot|Reboot]] ([[User talk:Reboot|talk]]) 16:55, 4 October 2016 (EDT)
- [[User:Reboot|Reboot]] ([[User talk:Reboot|talk]]) 16:55, 4 October 2016 (EDT)
Line 162: Line 162:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


:Normally when there is an explicit disclaimer against redistributing the content without permission, we would make some effort to seek consent from the author or person who derived a set of statistics like that. However in this case, I think it's reasonable to use the information (although still with due credit). It's not as though you copied/pasted his exact work for use and commentary: it seems to me that you've interpreted the statistics that he has provided (correct me if I am wrong). And regarding the dependability of these statistics, I personally think jdaster64's reputation on providing such statistics is enough to provide a fairly confident reference. However, if you weren't sure about the reliability of any calculated statistics from a particular source, you could still use it for the time-being if there is no other information currently available to compare it to. It would be preferred that such information have {{tem|better source}} attached.
:Normally when there is an explicit disclaimer against redistributing the content without permission, we would make some effort to seek consent from the author or person who derived a set of statistics like that. However in this case, I think it's reasonable to use the information (although still with due credit). It's not as though you copied/pasted his exact work for use and commentary: it seems to me that you've interpreted the statistics that he has provided (correct me if I am wrong). And regarding the dependability of these statistics, I personally think jdaster64's reputation on providing such statistics is enough to provide a fairly confident reference. However, if you weren't sure about the reliability of any calculated statistics from a particular source, you could still use it for the time-being if there is no other information currently available to compare it to. It would be preferred that such information have {{tem|bettersource}} attached.


:I hope this helps ya. &ndash; [[User talk:YoshiKong]] 18:11, 12 October 2016 (EDT)
:I hope this helps ya. &ndash; [[User talk:YoshiKong]] 18:11, 12 October 2016 (EDT)
Line 261: Line 261:
== RE: image category ==
== RE: image category ==


I'm going to say yes, but there isn't a category for it yet. Many pictures like that one need a category. [[:Category:Photos]] ({{tem|photo}}) needs to be gone through amongst other [[Help:License|copyright tags]]. Question is, what category should be created for pictures of people? I would ask {{user|Porplemontage}} for advice (or even ask him to remove the <code><nowiki>[[Category:Photos]]</nowiki></code> code temporarily to force affected images into [[Special:UncategorizedFiles]], like it was done several months ago with sprites and screenshots). --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:56, 15 December 2016 (EST)
I'm going to say yes, but there isn't a category for it yet. Many pictures like that one need a category. [[:Category:Promotional photos]] ({{tem|promophoto}}) needs to be gone through amongst other [[Help:License|copyright tags]]. Question is, what category should be created for pictures of people? I would ask {{user|Porplemontage}} for advice (or even ask him to remove the <code><nowiki>[[Category:Promotional photos]]</nowiki></code> code temporarily to force affected images into [[Special:UncategorizedFiles]], like it was done several months ago with sprites and screenshots). --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:56, 15 December 2016 (EST)


== Replace Images ==
== Replace Images ==
Line 300: Line 300:
== ''Partners in Time'' screenshot ==
== ''Partners in Time'' screenshot ==


I saw that you uploaded {{file link|MLPiT Petey Piranha battle.png}}, however it looks like part of Luigi's cap is cut off. Was this an emulator glitch?
I saw that you uploaded {{MediaLink|MLPiT Petey Piranha battle.png}}, however it looks like part of Luigi's cap is cut off. Was this an emulator glitch?


{{User:Shokora/sig}} 04:51, 12 January 2017 (EST)
{{User:Shokora/sig}} 04:51, 12 January 2017 (EST)
:No worries. The [[:File:Petey partners in time battle.jpg|JPG]] hasn't been deleted yet, but I'd suggest just keeping your version on the wiki until you're able to recapture it: that would save the trouble of going back and updating the links again.
:{{User:Shokora/sig}} 05:22, 12 January 2017 (EST)
Just like Dolphin Emulator, there isn't a set and forget solution to what is the best settings to use. DeSmuME, 0.9.12 is in the works that could have fixed the slight issue but don't hold your breath for a release. The developers relish in the idea of annoying users by delaying releases and withholding much needed features for the emulator because they had a bad time with the more obnoxious users. So they punish everyone, even if those users are innocent where the minority are the obnoxious ones. They aren't very nice. Two wrongs don't make a right sort of deal.
The detail is so little that the current version of that PNG is better than the JPEG so I think the JPEG is worth deleting. If you really want to test things out, does SoftRasterizer render that part of the image correctly? Maybe you can stitch the two better halves of that screenshot together. I heard some good things about DraStic (iOS and Android DS emulator and $5 to own a copy of the software). --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 21:29, 12 January 2017 (EST)
:Honestly, I don't think many articles exist with files using the <code>Media:</code> prefix. I might be wrong though. I could only verify that [[Nintendo Switch]] and [[Electrodrome]] used it. Use a bot to perform the switches. Use care though! There could be intentional uses of the prefix, such as {{tem|file link}} itself as a demonstration of its limitations. I would make sure to specify a specific namespace with your bot replacements.
:<code>python replace.py -ns:0 -catr:Main -regex '\[\[Media\:(.+)(\|.*)?\]\]' '<nowiki>{{file link|\1\2}}</nowiki>'</code>
:Be sure to test this regex before committing changes. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:02, 15 January 2017 (EST)
== Image To Replace ==
I'm shocked that [[:File:Shrowser M&LPiT sprite.png]] isn't in [[User:{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Sandbox]]! --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 17:59, 18 January 2017 (EST)
== iQue ==
Looks good! Nice work.
{{User:Shokora/sig}} 05:45, 24 January 2017 (EST)
:Sure, a history section would be good. If you're referencing information from that Chinese webpage, I think it's best to include the sentence in its original Chinese as part of the reference (so people can easily compare their own translation if necessary). When an entire section on the wiki can apply to a single reference, what I normally do is use the reference after the first sentence. And then at the end of each paragraph thereafter. This way, readers don't have to go back to the first part of the section if they wanted to view the reference again. The <nowiki><ref name=></nowiki> code should also be used if the references are exactly the same, so that they are grouped together and not coded as separate references.
:{{User:Shokora/sig}} 16:30, 24 January 2017 (EST)
==iQue-related inquiry==
Yo.
Someone on another site I go to is curious about the iQue, and most specifically, the download links on [http://www.ique.com/products/M_athome.htm this page]. If I'm not too annoying, would you able to tell what the downloads are for? Automatic translations aren't giving anything comprehensible. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 22:27, 28 January 2017 (EST)
:Thank you very much! --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 09:28, 29 January 2017 (EST)
== In-game hypothesis ==
As long as you preface it by saying that the information comes from ''x'', yes. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 23:01, 3 February 2017 (EST)
== Re: upscaled screenshots ==
Hi there. Sorry about the slight delay in responding to you.
I've seen Wildgoosespeeder lately uploading native resolution Nintendo 64 screenshots, which is perfectly acceptable according to policy. The only issue I see is that smaller parts of the image become much more difficult to see. Compare [http://www.mariowiki.com/images/archive/1/11/20170206043834%21FallOntoTheCagedIsland.png this] with [http://www.mariowiki.com/images/1/11/FallOntoTheCagedIsland.png this] for example. But the same could be said about small game sprites, which we always recommend uploading at the correct resolution. But if you were wanting to zoom in and crop a particular part of the image (like an object or character), high quality upscaling should be absolutely okay.
I'd say that it's not always strictly necessary to convert HD-rendering screenshots to their native hardware resolutions. But it's acceptable to do so.
{{User:Shokora/sig}} 07:59, 8 February 2017 (EST)
:I agree with {{user|Shokora}}. I think I have said somewhere else on this wiki that if you do it to get a {{tem|game-3Drender}} instead of a {{tem|game-screenshot}}, minus HUD elements, that could be a good enough exception to the general rule. At the time, for example, I felt compelled just to leave [[:File:Goomba Village.PNG]] alone compared to the rest of screenshots of [[Goomba Village (place)|Goomba Village]]. Also, I am debating leaving [[:File:SM64 CG Peachscastle.png]] alone as well. Just be sure to avoid common pitfalls as described in [[User:Wildgoosespeeder/sandbox#Glide64 settings to more closely match real N64 hardware internal resolution|my guide]] and [http://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php/Nintendo_64_emulators#High-level_vs._low-level_graphics this page] (HL vs. LL graphics and texture filtering). --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 00:17, 9 February 2017 (EST)

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)