Editing Template talk:SSB4Characters
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Reason?== | ==Reason?== | ||
{{talk}} | |||
It seems weird to shove away part of an article's information to a template. It's annoying for edits and doesn't seem to give many benefits. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | It seems weird to shove away part of an article's information to a template. It's annoying for edits and doesn't seem to give many benefits. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | ||
:Yeah, this strategy of dealing with charts was never formally approved, afaik. It's also done with {{tem|MarioKart7Parts}} and {{tem|MarioKart8Parts}} - looks like some guy just did it and no one complained. I guess it makes a bit more sense to outsource the eye-crossing stat charts, but this character chart is definitely getting excessive, and frankly, the ''MK'' charts don't ''need'' to be split anyway - and like you said, in all cases, it ''does'' add one more step to get to the editing part (plus it doesn't work well with checking refs). Perhaps it'd be a good idea to make a Proposal (a regular one, not a TPP) to establish once and for all whether this sort of thing is a good idea or a bad one? - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 22:26, 6 December 2015 (EST) | :Yeah, this strategy of dealing with charts was never formally approved, afaik. It's also done with {{tem|MarioKart7Parts}} and {{tem|MarioKart8Parts}} - looks like some guy just did it and no one complained. I guess it makes a bit more sense to outsource the eye-crossing stat charts, but this character chart is definitely getting excessive, and frankly, the ''MK'' charts don't ''need'' to be split anyway - and like you said, in all cases, it ''does'' add one more step to get to the editing part (plus it doesn't work well with checking refs). Perhaps it'd be a good idea to make a Proposal (a regular one, not a TPP) to establish once and for all whether this sort of thing is a good idea or a bad one? - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 22:26, 6 December 2015 (EST) | ||
