Editing Template talk:SMB

==Enemy Clones and other objects==
{{talk}}
Can ''[[Super Mario Bros. 35]]'' have it's own row on this template? I just random paged onto [[Enemy clone]] and the sight of a page with no navboxes hurts my soul. I kid, I kid, but it feels really strange to have that any article just float around without a navbox. While mixing it is a bad idea for similar reasons to [[Template:DK]] discussed [[Template talk:DK#Split between classic and Game Boy versions|here]], surely a entirely separate row isn't so bad? [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 18:40, November 2, 2024 (EDT)
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{talk}}
 Can ''[[Super Mario Bros. 35]]'' have it's own row on this template? I just random paged onto [[Enemy clone]] and the sight of a page with no navboxes hurts my soul. I kid, I kid, but it feels really strange to have that any article just float around without a navbox. While mixing it is a bad idea for similar reasons to [[Template:DK]] discussed [[Template talk:DK#Split between classic and Game Boy versions|here]], surely a entirely separate row isn't so bad? [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 18:40, November 2, 2024 (EDT)
-:Not at all, I approve the adding of those two elements (being the [[Enemy clone]] and the [[POW Block]]), with his own "asterisk". Let's try [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Template%3ASMB&type=revision&diff=4420710&oldid=4418972 this] --{{User:Mariuigi_Khed/sig}} 11:37, November 3, 2024 (EST)
-::mmm, still feeling iffy. As I understand it, SMB 35 is less "rerelease", "remake", or "reissue" and more "we took the existing game and put it into a new genre". It might be farther out than DK the arcade game compared to DK the Game Boy game. Counterpoint, of course, is that 35 has the same levels as the original. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 11:34, November 6, 2024 (EST)