Editing Template talk:Reminder
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Is that block sign part of the template? If so, I'm opposing the change. The purpose of the Reminder is to make people aware of a mistake ''for the very first time''. In most cases they don't even know that they did something wrong. It's not supposed to be a punishment. For this reason, I'm also sceptical about the smiley. He looks quite annoyed, and that's not the kind of impression a receiver of the Reminder should get. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 09:37, 24 July 2009 (EDT) | Is that block sign part of the template? If so, I'm opposing the change. The purpose of the Reminder is to make people aware of a mistake ''for the very first time''. In most cases they don't even know that they did something wrong. It's not supposed to be a punishment. For this reason, I'm also sceptical about the smiley. He looks quite annoyed, and that's not the kind of impression a receiver of the Reminder should get. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 09:37, 24 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I kind of agree with Time Q. I like how the template changed from a rather stern-looking warning sign to a smiley, but the smiley seems to be frowning down upon the user. We don't want users to be frowned upon when they make a mistake for the first time. Accidents happen. So, maybe if it had a less 'annoyed'-looking smiley -- as Time Q put it -- it would look even better. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 14:39, 26 July 2009 (EDT) | :I kind of agree with Time Q. I like how the template changed from a rather stern-looking warning sign to a smiley, but the smiley seems to be frowning down upon the user. We don't want users to be frowned upon when they make a mistake for the first time. Accidents happen. So, maybe if it had a less 'annoyed'-looking smiley -- as Time Q put it -- it would look even better. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 14:39, 26 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
I certainly like how much less... cold the inclusion of the smile makes it look. In some circumstances, sounding human is better than sounding professional. On the other hand, the image itself has a white background, which looks bad on some skins. So, that should be changed to clear. Also, on my display, the image is larger than the template itself, which looks wrong. {{User:Twentytwofiftyseven/sig}} 02:28, 9 August 2009 (EDT) | I certainly like how much less... cold the inclusion of the smile makes it look. In some circumstances, sounding human is better than sounding professional. On the other hand, the image itself has a white background, which looks bad on some skins. So, that should be changed to clear. Also, on my display, the image is larger than the template itself, which looks wrong. {{User:Twentytwofiftyseven/sig}} 02:28, 9 August 2009 (EDT) |