Editing Template talk:Delete
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You can replace <tt><nowiki>'''Reason:''' {{{1}}}.</nowiki></tt> with <tt><nowiki>{{#if:{{{1|}}}|'''Reason:''' {{{1}}}.|}}</nowiki></tt> which makes the reason stuff not show up if first value is not defined. {{User:Smiddle/sig}} 05:13, 24 February 2007 (EST) | You can replace <tt><nowiki>'''Reason:''' {{{1}}}.</nowiki></tt> with <tt><nowiki>{{#if:{{{1|}}}|'''Reason:''' {{{1}}}.|}}</nowiki></tt> which makes the reason stuff not show up if first value is not defined. {{User:Smiddle/sig}} 05:13, 24 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
<center><small>Please <span style="text-decoration:underline">delete</span> any corresponding talk pages as well.</small></center> | <center><small>Please <span style="text-decoration:underline">delete</span> any corresponding talk pages as well.</small></center> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<includeonly>[[Category:To be deleted]]</includeonly> | <includeonly>[[Category:To be deleted|{{PAGENAME}}]]</includeonly> | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:Notice Templates]]</noinclude></nowiki> | <noinclude>[[Category:Notice Templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]</noinclude></nowiki> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 34: | ||
== Link to deletion policy == | == Link to deletion policy == | ||
In the template, there should be a link to the [[MarioWiki:Deletion | In the template, there should be a link to the [[MarioWiki:Deletion Policy|deletion policy]] to allow newbies to understand the meaning of deletion. --{{User:B.wilson/sig}} 21:28, 10 January 2012 (EST) | ||
:It's more of a tool to let admins track down things that need deleting, but I suppose a link wouldn't hurt, especially if it's colour-linked to be black so it doesn't stick out and clash with the greyscale motif of the template. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 11:29, 12 January 2012 (EST) | :It's more of a tool to let admins track down things that need deleting, but I suppose a link wouldn't hurt, especially if it's colour-linked to be black so it doesn't stick out and clash with the greyscale motif of the template. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 11:29, 12 January 2012 (EST) | ||
| Line 50: | Line 49: | ||
== Document Proper Usage? == | == Document Proper Usage? == | ||
{{talk}} | |||
Should this template document it's usage, especially for <code><nowiki>{{delete|reason}}</nowiki></code>? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} | Should this template document it's usage, especially for <code><nowiki>{{delete|reason}}</nowiki></code>? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
:{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 10:51, 14 July 2016 (EDT) | :{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 10:51, 14 July 2016 (EDT) | ||
::I thought I explained because there was a parameter that can be used but is not documented. There is just no documentation how to use the template. {{tem| | ::I thought I explained because there was a parameter that can be used but is not documented. There is just no documentation how to use the template. {{tem|tobedeleted}} also has this issue. Many templates we use regularly have no documentation and related templates. {{tem|reminder}} and {{tem|rewrite}} do what {{tem|delete}} don't. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 19:23, 1 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
:::I don't see the harm in providing a usage section in noinclude tags, but overall, it's not wholly necessary, especially since there is only one parameter you can modify in a lot of these. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 19:28, 1 August 2016 (EDT) | :::I don't see the harm in providing a usage section in noinclude tags, but overall, it's not wholly necessary, especially since there is only one parameter you can modify in a lot of these. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 19:28, 1 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
::::Sadly, new users or even users new to Wiki editing may not know the intricacies of how we do things here. Only experienced editors know what to do. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 19:32, 1 August 2016 (EDT) | ::::Sadly, new users or even users new to Wiki editing may not know the intricacies of how we do things here. Only experienced editors know what to do. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 19:32, 1 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
:::::Would [[Help:Template]] be sufficient? But even then, I suppose the inputs aren't immediately shown to newer users. Me, I learned how to use templates by looking at the coding ot templates in articles. Overall, I don't see the harm. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 19:37, 1 August 2016 (EDT) | :::::Would [[Help:Template]] be sufficient? But even then, I suppose the inputs aren't immediately shown to newer users. Me, I learned how to use templates by looking at the coding ot templates in articles. Overall, I don't see the harm. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 19:37, 1 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
::::::I'm starting to get the feeling that we need an overhaul how we list and document each template. I mean we have game templates ({{tem|SMG}} and {{tem|YI}}), so why not do this for templates? A template for listing templates and we transclude that template into documentation | ::::::I'm starting to get the feeling that we need an overhaul how we list and document each template. I mean we have game templates ({{tem|SMG}} and {{tem|YI}}), so why not do this for templates? A template for listing templates and we transclude that template into documentation pages. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 20:03, 1 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
