| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
| |
|
| Cmon, they do look like they do in Super Mario galaxy 2, right? I added that in and somebody deleted it!-'''Ultimate Gamer''' | | Cmon, they do look like they do in Super Mario galaxy 2, right? I added that in and somebody deleted it!-'''Ultimate Gamer''' |
|
| |
| No, I'm sorry. I beat the game, Whomp is nowhere to be found. End of discussion.(I hope) [[User:C.G.4.U.]]
| |
|
| |
|
| == Split Super Whomp from Whomp == | | == Split Super Whomp from Whomp == |
| {{Proposal outcome|grey|DELETED BY THE PROPOSER}}<br> | | {{TPP}} |
| {{Settled TPP}}
| |
| We have articles for bigger enemies (Grand Goomba, Mega Wiggler etc), so why don't we have one for Super Whomp? Sure they behave like normal Whomps, but Grand Goombas behave the same as Goombas. | | We have articles for bigger enemies (Grand Goomba, Mega Wiggler etc), so why don't we have one for Super Whomp? Sure they behave like normal Whomps, but Grand Goombas behave the same as Goombas. |
|
| |
|
| '''Proposer:''' {{User|Tails777}}<br> | | '''Proposer:''' {{User|Tails777}}<br> |
| '''Proposed Deadline:''' September 24, 2012, 23:59 GMT<br> | | '''Deadline:''' September 24, 2012, 23:59 GMT |
| '''Date Withdrawn:''' September 11, 2012
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Support=== | | ===Support=== |
| Line 38: |
Line 34: |
|
| |
|
| == Split Big Whomp from Whomp == | | == Split Big Whomp from Whomp == |
| {{Proposal outcome|green|SPLIT 4-1}}<br>
| | |
| {{Settled TPP}}
| |
| I made a mistake on the other proposal (thanks Raven Effect for correcting me on that). This is basically the same proposal, but instead calling it Big Whomp since it's an official name. | | I made a mistake on the other proposal (thanks Raven Effect for correcting me on that). This is basically the same proposal, but instead calling it Big Whomp since it's an official name. |
|
| |
|
| '''Proposer:''' {{User|Tails777}}<br> | | '''Proposer:''' {{User|Tails777}}<br> |
| '''Deadline:''' September 26, 2012, 23:59 GMT | | '''Deadline:''' September 24, 2012, 23:59 GMT |
|
| |
|
| ===Support=== | | ===Support=== |
| #{{User|Tails777}} I once again support my own proposal. | | #{{User|Tails777}} I once again support my own proposal. |
| #{{User|Raven Effect}} Per this proposal
| |
| #{{User|JORDAN DEBONO}} Per above proposal.
| |
| #{{User|Koopa K}} Per Tails777
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Oppose=== | | ===Oppose=== |
| #{{User|Coooool123}} Do we REALLY need another miniscule article that will just end up getting merged again? I don't think this is a necessary change. There's already little information on Big Whomps, and just because we've separated others (to my chagrin), doesn't mean that we need to continue this. All we need is yet another stub to add to our expanding list of tiny articles. Though it will probably be futile, I say merge them all!!
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Comments=== | | ===Comments=== |
| You're going to need to cancel the other one now. {{User|Raven Effect}}
| |
| :Already done. {{User|Tails777}}
| |
| According to the page, they're actually called Super Whomps. Did you mean this, or were you actually referring to the Whomp King? {{User|Coooool123}}
| |
| :Super Whomp is the unofficial name that people gave them which is why they were merged with Whomps in the first place. {{User|Raven Effect}}
| |
| ::Okay thanks for clearing that up. {{User|Coooool123}}
| |
| @'''Coooool123''' Small articles aren't stubs my good man stubs are articles that lack info so for instance [[Banana Camera Film]] isn't a stub because there isn't very much info that can be put in the article. Also your not splitting these would make the wiki inconsistent because other things like Big Whomps are split like Super Thwomp which is just a big thwomp, Mask Koopa which is just a Koopa with a mask, and Goomba Tower which is nothing more then Goombas stacked on top of each other. But they are all split because they have official names just like Big Whomps do. {{User|Raven Effect}}
| |
|
| |
| == Thwomp variant ==
| |
|
| |
| Why aren't whomps variants of thwomps!? [[Special:Contributions/90.216.251.105|90.216.251.105]] 12:03, February 25, 2025 (EST)
| |
| :We classify them as relatives of Thwomps because they are different enough to not just be a simple variation of a Thwomp yet share a few broad characteristics (angry rock enemies that crush). {{User:LadySophie17/sig}} 14:01, February 25, 2025 (EST)
| |
| ::I guess that makes sense. [[Special:Contributions/90.216.251.105|90.216.251.105]] 14:11, February 25, 2025 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| For the record, bios have consistently referred to them as "associates" of Thwomps rather than Thwomps themselves. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:28, February 25, 2025 (EST)
| |
