Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{notforumtalk}} |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Line 43: |
Line 44: |
| *Well, it was a responsible thing you brought it up :) {{User:WarioLoaf/sig}} | | *Well, it was a responsible thing you brought it up :) {{User:WarioLoaf/sig}} |
| :You keep saying that I am a great member in this community, but you never credit yourself. This was a good argument to bring up. ^_^ {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 18:04, 10 December 2006 (EST) | | :You keep saying that I am a great member in this community, but you never credit yourself. This was a good argument to bring up. ^_^ {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 18:04, 10 December 2006 (EST) |
|
| |
| The last time I looked at the article, there was an image of [[Baby Wario]] on [[Light Blue Yoshi]]; now it's gone. [[User:Super Griffin|Super Griffin]] ([[User talk:Super Griffin|talk]]) 08:43, 16 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Trophy Info== | | ==Trophy Info== |
Line 238: |
Line 237: |
| :I swear I removed that one before. Anyway, I've checked copies of both the NA and PAL manual and neither of them state such a thing, so I removed it. If that information is added back, it better be sourced. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 20:52, 18 October 2014 (EDT) | | :I swear I removed that one before. Anyway, I've checked copies of both the NA and PAL manual and neither of them state such a thing, so I removed it. If that information is added back, it better be sourced. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 20:52, 18 October 2014 (EDT) |
| ::Out of curiosity, I went through the history and found that it was added back in January... of 2007. [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Wario&diff=prev&oldid=75595 Here's the particular revision], and as far as I can tell, it's always been there. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | | ::Out of curiosity, I went through the history and found that it was added back in January... of 2007. [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Wario&diff=prev&oldid=75595 Here's the particular revision], and as far as I can tell, it's always been there. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} |
| It is in the Nintendo Power Magazine article that we can see that he stole the kart of a Koopa Troopa, as you can se here https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EvBF-CDXMAE30Ae?format=jpg&name=large {{unsigned|176.165.136.20}}
| |
|
| |
|
| == That quote is WAY too long == | | == That quote is WAY too long == |
Line 244: |
Line 242: |
| Yeah, I'm going to change the quote to something a <s>LOT</s> little shorter. {{User:DaisyLuigi/sig}} | | Yeah, I'm going to change the quote to something a <s>LOT</s> little shorter. {{User:DaisyLuigi/sig}} |
| :No it isn't: First: A quote isn't determined by length, but by how much it represents charecter. Its ok to have long quote, but it has to represent him. It's good. And you can't just change a quote without agreement (TPP) I think.[[User:Toadbrigade5|Toadbrigade5]] ([[User talk:Toadbrigade5|talk]]) 21:22, 18 November 2014 (EST) | | :No it isn't: First: A quote isn't determined by length, but by how much it represents charecter. Its ok to have long quote, but it has to represent him. It's good. And you can't just change a quote without agreement (TPP) I think.[[User:Toadbrigade5|Toadbrigade5]] ([[User talk:Toadbrigade5|talk]]) 21:22, 18 November 2014 (EST) |
|
| |
| == The "Every Copy of SM64 is personalized" rumor. ==
| |
|
| |
| Should we mention the Wario Apparation rumor or not? I understand Wikipedias do not add rumors, but would a mention in the Trivia section count as addable? {{User:Bowser64/sig}} 19:50, October 30, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :It's more of a meme than an actual rumor and we don't really talk about that. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 19:53, October 30, 2021 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| I see. {{User:Bowser64/sig}} 19:55, October 30, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :It probably belongs [[List_of_Mario_references_on_the_Internet#Memes|in this article though.]] {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 19:56, October 30, 2021 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Errors under certain sections ==
| |
|
| |
| Under <em>Mario Tennis</em>'s "Mario Tennis" subheading, Wario is described as having 'long sleeves despite that in his artwork and the game's title screen, he is shown wearing long sleeves' which is incorrect and makes no sense. Wario has short sleeves in-game, but the cover art depicts him with long sleeves, which is what I believe the author was trying to say.
| |
| Under <em>Super Smash Bros. Ultimate</em>'s subheading "Classic Mode", there is a spelling error: 'siganture' instead of the word 'signature'.
| |
| I can't edit these so I'm posting them here for someone who can. Thanks. [[User:K1NGSH0RTIE|K1NGSH0RTIE]]
| |
| :The corrections have been applied. Thank you! [[File:Go Mario.png]] {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:31, April 22, 2023 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Primary image ==
| |
| Wario has two main outfits: the "plumber" outfit used in the ''Super Mario'' franchise and most ''Wario Land'' games, and the "biker" outfit used in the ''WarioWare'' and ''Smash Bros.'' series. The standard practice for primary images on this wiki is to use official artwork from the most recently-released game that uses the character's main design (without any game-specific outfit or aesthetic differences). However, for Wario in particular, there is a strong argument to be made that the "biker" outfit ''is'' one of his main designs.
| |
|
| |
| My question is: ''should'' Wario's ''WarioWare'' design be considered a primary-enough design to allow its use as the main image for the article? Does ''WarioWare: Get It Together!'' (2021) count as a more recently-released game than ''Super Mario Party'' (2018) with official art that doesn't have any game-specific design details? If not, why not? {{User:JanMisali/sig}} 16:03, March 30, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :The ''WarioWare'' design appears to be series specific which we generally don't use for infobox images. It's also why we don't use King Boo's ''Luigi's Mansion'' design for his infobox image, even when ''Luigi's Mansion 3'' was his latest appearance. {{User:Nightwicked Bowser/sig}} 16:27, March 30, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::Well, it's ''mostly'' series-specific. It is also used in ''Smash'' as his default outfit, and appears in ''Super Mario Maker'' and ''Yoshi's Woolly World'' as costumes. Regardless, that does make sense. The "plumber" design ''is'' used in a wider variety of ''Mario'' media, so I suppose it is reasonable to prioritize it for that reason. Thanks for clearing that up! {{User:JanMisali/sig}} 16:37, March 30, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :I would say this could be worthy of something like the [[Talk:Thwomp#Decide which design to use for the infobox artwork|Thwomp proposal]], because I do think both designs are about equally important to Wario as a character.{{User:LadySophie17/sig}} 18:45, March 30, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::I kinda agree with LadySophie. While Wario's overalls design is the most common and notable appearance, his biker appearance is just as noteworthy and important to his character. King Boo's ''Luigi's Mansion'' design I could also say is in a similar boat, maybe to a lesser extent, as it's not nearly as frequent as the main design, but even that feels notable enough to King Boo's character portrayal in ''Luigi's Mansion''. Regardless, a proposal concerning such things doesn't sound like a bad idea. {{User:Tails777/sig}}
| |
| :::I would say the plumber one takes priority and the WarioWare outfit, while important, doesn't come close to the visibility of the overalls outfit that it needs to be in the infobox too. Thwomp's case has been generally going back and forth pretty freely; this one is more primary-secondary. {{User:Mario/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| == Easter Egg :D ==
| |
|
| |
| Can we change the words "gluttony" and "gluttonous" to be spelled "glutonny" and "glutonnous" as a little hint towards the best Wario player in smash bros? I think it would be a really niche, neat easter egg for anyone keeping an eye out, and a tribute to the GOAT of ultimate. {{user|Dogmccheese}}
| |
| :No. The Mario Wiki is meant to be professional, and is not biased. {{User:Sparks/sig}} 23:21, November 30, 2024 (EST)
| |