Editing Talk:Wario's Warehouse

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 366: Line 366:
== Delete page and anything related to it from the wiki ==
== Delete page and anything related to it from the wiki ==


{{Settled TPP}}
{{SettledTPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|blue|canceled by the administrators}}<small>Evidence that Wario's Warehouse was real has been found, see comments.</small>
{{ProposalOutcome|blue|canceled by the administrators}}<small>Evidence that Wario's Warehouse was real has been found, see comments.</small>


The article cites zero sources (word-of-mouth such as "actually, I saw this website before my own eyes!" is a worthless source, even if there's a consensus around it), and all Google knows on this subject is ultimately derived from this wiki. I realise that Wayback Machine's archiving system has always been finicky with Nintendo's European websites, but screen-capturing or downloading the web page wholesale have always served as alternatives to that, and nobody made an inkling of effort towards proving the material's authenticity. At this point I doubt even the site's URL was preserved.
The article cites zero sources (word-of-mouth such as "actually, I saw this website before my own eyes!" is a worthless source, even if there's a consensus around it), and all Google knows on this subject is ultimately derived from this wiki. I realise that Wayback Machine's archiving system has always been finicky with Nintendo's European websites, but screen-capturing or downloading the web page wholesale have always served as alternatives to that, and nobody made an inkling of effort towards proving the material's authenticity. At this point I doubt even the site's URL was preserved.
Line 457: Line 457:


==Post proposal comments==
==Post proposal comments==
[BJAODN option is the worst one, even worse than deleting the page for lack of concrete proof. This is not a "bad joke". This is not a "deleted nonsense". This is an actual article. There is no mistake here, there is nothing that could be considered funny. It's just an article. Spectrogram (talk) 16:16, May 27, 2023 (EDT)]
:It seems like the only way to keep the content without having to delete it and risk losing it in the long term (hell not even Wayback is safe imo). Also, assuming the page is absolutely made-up in the worst-case scenario, I think it takes quite an imagination to make up this kind of elaborate nonsense (perhaps in the exceptional case where no one wants this in bjaodn, I COULD just store it as a user subpage or something), and I DO find the content itself quite funny. I believe the only real "reason" for content to qualify for bjaodn is "someone found it funny". {{User:Mario/sig}} 17:23, May 27, 2023 (EDT)
:It seems like the only way to keep the content without having to delete it and risk losing it in the long term (hell not even Wayback is safe imo). Also, assuming the page is absolutely made-up in the worst-case scenario, I think it takes quite an imagination to make up this kind of elaborate nonsense (perhaps in the exceptional case where no one wants this in bjaodn, I COULD just store it as a user subpage or something), and I DO find the content itself quite funny. I believe the only real "reason" for content to qualify for bjaodn is "someone found it funny". {{User:Mario/sig}} 17:23, May 27, 2023 (EDT)


Line 492: Line 491:
Happy for you to share that email! Please don't share this email address though (the pixelatron email address is ok to share).
Happy for you to share that email! Please don't share this email address though (the pixelatron email address is ok to share).


Really sorry but I don't have any of the material. I can reassure you the Talk page archive definitely isn't completely made up - I dimly recognise some stuff in there as my own, or at least very much my style. Lots of it doesn't ring a bell but that might be the ones Richard wrote, especially if he wrote them after I left Nintendo.
Really sorry but I don't have any of the material. I can reassure you the Talk page archive definitely isn't completely made up - I dimly recognise some stuff in there as my own, or at least very much my style. Lots of it doesn't ring a bell but that might be the ones Richard wrong, especially if he wrote them after I left Nintendo.


Sorry I can't be more help!
Sorry I can't be more help!

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)