Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
| |
|
| == Split Bad Luck Space and Extra Bad Luck Space == | | == Split Bad Luck Space and Extra Bad Luck Space == |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | {{SettledTPP}} |
| {{Proposal outcome|passed|4-5-1|split while covering Bad Luck Space and Extra Bad Luck Space in the same article}} | | {{ProposalOutcome|passed|4-5-1|split while covering Bad Luck Space and Extra Bad Luck Space in the same article}} |
| This stems from the discussion above. | | This stems from the discussion above. |
|
| |
|
Line 49: |
Line 49: |
|
| |
|
| == Reverse the earlier proposal to Split the Bad Luck Space and Extra Bad Luck Space == | | == Reverse the earlier proposal to Split the Bad Luck Space and Extra Bad Luck Space == |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | {{TPP}} |
| {{Proposal outcome|failed|1-10|keep split}}
| |
| That Proposal to split the article into two is stupid. I do not see ANY difference between The Bad Luck Space and the Unlucky Space. I know they replace the Bowser Spaces, but, I'd say it is just a Bowser Space wannabe. Either way, It is still the opposite of the Lucky Space. If there are more of you who say They are not the same, What makes you think they are so different that the split was SO important to you all? | | That Proposal to split the article into two is stupid. I do not see ANY difference between The Bad Luck Space and the Unlucky Space. I know they replace the Bowser Spaces, but, I'd say it is just a Bowser Space wannabe. Either way, It is still the opposite of the Lucky Space. If there are more of you who say They are not the same, What makes you think they are so different that the split was SO important to you all? |
|
| |
|
Line 56: |
Line 55: |
|
| |
|
| '''Proposer:''' {{User|Partier}}<br> | | '''Proposer:''' {{User|Partier}}<br> |
| '''Deadline:''' February 25, 2020, 23:59 GMT | | '''Deadline:''' February 28, 2020, 23:59 GMT |
|
| |
|
| ===Re-merge=== | | ===Re-merge=== |
Line 71: |
Line 70: |
| #{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per all and the previous proposal. Nothing said here makes me even consider that these are the same and need to be re-merged. | | #{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per all and the previous proposal. Nothing said here makes me even consider that these are the same and need to be re-merged. |
| #{{User|Obsessive Mario Fan}} Per all. | | #{{User|Obsessive Mario Fan}} Per all. |
| #{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Comments=== | | ===Comments=== |
| You do realize that the Lucky Space in Super Mario Party does the same thing, but with good events, right? --[[User:Partier|Partier]] ([[User talk:Partier|talk]]) 00:01, February 11, 2020 (EST) | | You do realize that the Lucky Space in Super Mario Party does the same thing, but with good events, right? --[[User:Partier|Partier]] ([[User talk:Partier|talk]]) 00:01, February 11, 2020 (EST) |
| :Actually, the "Re-merge" option should be above the Opposition, not below. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 11:08, February 11, 2020 (EST) | | :Actually, the "Re-merge" option should be above the Opposition, not below. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 11:08, February 11, 2020 (EST) |
|
| |
| == Add a redirect-to-another-article section ==
| |
| {{Settled TPP}}
| |
| {{Proposal outcome|failed|0-2-3|Make no changes}}
| |
| I get that you guys see the [[Bad Luck Space]] as a different Space than this one. But I still kind of want some sort of bridge between the two. Right now, it's a ONE-way bridge. I figured the other way could have a Super Mario Party section that says ''Main article: [[Bad Luck Space]]''. Whatever that kind of section is called, I think it should be there. It could end my little problem with the split once and for all.
| |
|
| |
| '''Proposer:''' {{User|Partier}}<br>
| |
| '''Deadline:''' November 2, 2020 23:59 GTM
| |
|
| |
| ===Add it, and Nothing else===
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ===Add it and do the same with the Bowser Space===
| |
| #{{User|Partier}} This here is for if the Bowser Space doesn't have one of those yet. I think this part will win because you say it's more like Bowser Space than this one. I still kind of disagree. But I vote here anyways because of YOUR views.
| |
| #{{User|DarkNight}} I don't see why this needs a proposal; it's such a minor thing, but per proposal.
| |
| <s>{{User|Benjaminkirsc}} There is a lot of info that could be merged. The same thing has to be done to Bowser Space. Also per all, it's a minor thing. Make sure it is merged in the next few days, and do the same thing with Bowser Space, make it merged (all of them) to this page.</s>
| |
|
| |
| ===Nope===
| |
| #{{User|Waluigi Time}} This didn't really need to be a proposal, but since it is, I don't think the Bad Luck Space is similar enough to the Unlucky Space to warrant an entire history section here. It's already in the "See also" section, that's enough in my opinion. I'd rather see this added to the Bowser Space article than here.
| |
| #{{User|Bazooka Mario}} A "see also" section is sufficient, but it's your call to add a one sentence phrase "the space in Super Mario Party bears similarities to this space" in some trivia or off-shoot line after the opening paragraph. Proposal not needed, and adding it to the history section isn't needed or desirable.
| |
| #{{User|Benjaminkirsc}} I changed my mind, I'm sorry. Thanks to Waluigi Time, I change my answer. New reason: No way, my boy. All are absolutely different. Also per Waluigi Time and Bazooka Mario, there should not be a proposal. Waluigi Time made a straight-to-point reason why. Used to say yes until it made more sense more it to say no. Update: Stop doing the same thing Partier, you did the same thing <s>3</s> 2 times now.
| |
|
| |
| ===Comments===
| |
| I hope you find it in your hearts, to forgive me for any drama I caused before. --[[User:Partier|Partier]] ([[User talk:Partier|talk]]) 17:13, October 19, 2020 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| [[User: Waluigi Time|Waluigi Time]], all of this info is just basically the same thing. Doing nothing would be more confusing than mering. [[User:Benjaminkirsc|Benjaminkirsc]] ([[User talk:Benjaminkirsc|talk]]) 14:22, October 20, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| :This applied to '''"every discussion"''' you took on in the merging process. [[User:Benjaminkirsc|Benjaminkirsc]] ([[User talk:Benjaminkirsc|talk]]) 14:24, October 20, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| ::I think you're confused here. First of all, this proposal has absolutely nothing to do with merging articles, only adding sections on the Bowser Space and Unlucky Space articles that direct readers to the Bad Luck Space article. Second, you've been around here long enough to know that "merge these articles in the next few days" is not at all how proposals work. Also, no, they aren't the same thing. Bowser Spaces and Bad Luck Spaces cause a roulette to appear that makes a random event happen to the players. Unlucky Spaces cause specific pre-determined events that change by board, making it closer to an Event Space than either of those other spaces. This is why I've wanted the Bad Luck Space split this entire time - it's much closer to the Bowser Space than the Unlucky Space, but it's also not actually either of those spaces. You could make a case for merging Bowser Space and Bad Luck Space (which I disagree with, it's a functional replacement but not the same thing), but Unlucky Space is its own thing and should be left alone. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 15:08, October 20, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| :::Thanks [[User:Benjaminkirsc|Benjaminkirsc]] ([[User talk:Benjaminkirsc|talk]]) 18:32, October 27, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| Alright, who changed the deadline? I think it's kind of cheating. I get that it has no need for a proposal. That does not mean you should say no. I have a lot more than one sentence to say on that. If this fails, My situation will continue. --[[User:Partier|Partier]] ([[User talk:Partier|talk]]) 15:06, November 1, 2020 (EST)
| |
| :I changed it, and it's not "cheating". All talk page proposals have to run for 14 days from the date of being proposed. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 15:11, November 1, 2020 (EST)
| |