Editing Talk:Undergrunt

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
==Should the Undergrunts be related to Monty Mole or not?==
==Should the Undergrunts be related to Monty Mole or not?==
{{Settled TPP}}
{{TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|passed|3-7-0|undergrunts are relatives/related}}
I wanted to discuss this topic to see what the Mario Wiki thinks about the moles in Mario Galaxy being Monty Mole species or not. Yes, I do know that we classify them as unrelated as of now, but I made this proposal due to some people still thinking they are related even after the agreement of them being not. So anyways, I am curious on what this wiki thinks about these mole species being related or not.
I wanted to discuss this topic to see what the Mario Wiki thinks about the moles in Mario Galaxy being Monty Mole species or not. Yes, I do know that we classify them as unrelated as of now, but I made this proposal due to some people still thinking they are related even after the agreement of them being not. So anyways, I am curious on what this wiki thinks about these mole species being related or not. Also, whether we say they are related or not, we should not instantly say that Undergrunts are Monty Mole species or relatives to them. For now at least, we should only consider them comparable, and we will only say they are related if an official source says that they are. I think it should be by proxy to not say a species is related to another unless explicit proof says otherwise (this is why Ragumo is considered a Monty Mole relative, but not the Undergrunts).


'''Proposer''': {{User|MontyMoleLoreMaster}} (banned)<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|MontyMoleLoreMaster}}<br>
'''Deadline''': <s>December 13, 2021, 23:59 GMT</s> December 20, 2021, 23:59 GMT
'''Deadline''': December 13, 2021 23:59 GMT


===Option 1: They are unrelated to the Monty Mole species.===
===Option 1: They are most likely unrelated to the Monty Mole species, due to no concrete info saying otherwise.===
<s>#{{User|MontyMoleLoreMaster}} I do not see why some people say that they are Monty Mole species. Nobody ever says other moles not confirmed to be Monty Mole species are related to Monty Moles so I do not see why the Undergrunts get a pass since they also have no official sources stating them as Monty Mole species. So yeah, I believe that the moles in Super Mario Galaxy were meant to be a separate mole species unrelated to Monty Mole. I only think people confused them as being related because of them being in a main series game and having a few similarities to the Monty Mole species.</s>
#{{User|MontyMoleLoreMaster}} I do not see why some people say that they are Monty Mole species. Nobody ever says other moles not confirmed to be Monty Mole species are related to Monty Moles so I do not see why the Undergrunts get a pass since they also have no official sources stating them as Monty Mole species. So yeah, I believe that the moles in Super Mario Galaxy were meant to be a separate mole species unrelated to Monty Mole. I only think people confused them as being related because of them being in a main series game and having a few similarities to the Monty Mole species.
#{{User|Niiue}} Per MontyMoleLoreMaster.
#{{User|Niiue}} Per MontyMoleLoreMaster.
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Clearly. Just because they're moles, doesn't mean they're related. They may be comparable, but definitely being relatives of Monty Moles, or being Monty Moles at all? No, no confirmation on that. At least Ragumo had a Japanese media noting the similarity. Per all.
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Clearly. Just because they're moles, doesn't mean they're related. They may be comparable, but definitely being relatives of Monty Moles, or being Monty Moles at all? No, no confirmation on that. At least Ragumo had a Japanese media noting the similarity. Per all.
#{{User|SmokedChili}} Per all. At best they're just comparable, like [[Maw-Ray]] and [[Gringill]].
#{{User|SmokedChili}} Per all.


===Option 2: They are related or are relatives to the Monty Mole species.===
===Option 2: I think that they are unrelated to Monty Mole, however, I believe an official source somewhere might say that they are related===
#{{User|OhoJeeOnFire}} I personally think that this makes the most sense.
 
===Option 3: I don’t care wether they are related to Monty Mole or not.===
 
===Option 4: They are most likely related or are relatives to the Monty Mole species, due to some of the similarities or the German name.===
#{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - There's too many design similarities (especially to the early days, note the cheeks) for it to be a coincidence. While I wouldn't call them a "variant" without more concrete evidence, I think relative is fine.
#{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - There's too many design similarities (especially to the early days, note the cheeks) for it to be a coincidence. While I wouldn't call them a "variant" without more concrete evidence, I think relative is fine.
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} They share some distinguishable traits with Monty Moles anyways (and [[Monty (Super Mario Galaxy)|their relatives]] also bear similarities with Rocky Wrenches), so I think this makes the most sense.
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} They share some distinguishable traits with Monty Moles anyways (and [[Monty (Super Mario Galaxy)|their relatives]] also bear similarities with Rocky Wrenches), so I think this makes the most sense.
#{{User|Chester Alan Arthur}} Per all.
#{{User|Chester Alan Arthur}} Per all.
#{{User|Ray Trace}} Per Doc von Schmeltwick. This would additionally create a large inconsistency to how we treat the difference between [[Swoop]] and [[Bat (Super Mario Galaxy)]].
#{{User|Ray Trace}} Per Doc von Schmeltwick. This would additionally create a large inconsistency to how we treat the difference between [[Swoop]] and [[Bat (Super Mario Galaxy)]].
#{{User|Sdman213}} Per all.
#{{User|OhoJeeOnFire}} Technically they are related. Per all.
#{{User|PanchamBro}} Per all.


===Option 3: Undergrunts are Monty Moles.===
===Option 5: Undergrunts are meant to be the exact same as Monty Moles, just with a different design and name (same applies with Montys and Rocky Wrenches).===


===Comments===
===Comments===
Line 44: Line 45:
:I'm pretty sure setting has absolutely nothing to do with the two enemies; Undergrunts are featured in a level with a blue sky filled with fruit and caterpillars eating it. Plus, the same thing applies to [[Swoop]] and the bats from Super Mario Galaxy (even sharing the same Japanese name as them) and they're still considered variants. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 22:57, December 13, 2021 (EST)
:I'm pretty sure setting has absolutely nothing to do with the two enemies; Undergrunts are featured in a level with a blue sky filled with fruit and caterpillars eating it. Plus, the same thing applies to [[Swoop]] and the bats from Super Mario Galaxy (even sharing the same Japanese name as them) and they're still considered variants. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 22:57, December 13, 2021 (EST)
::The setting point is understandable. But the difference between comparing the bats and Swoop over Undergrunts and Monty Moles is that with the bats they do have an official filename that shares a Japanese name with Swoop. Undergrunts on the other hand have no filename that hints at them being Monty Mole species. If they were planned to be related, they would have probably used a Monty Mole-like filename instead of just generic Japanese mole names. Both the bats and Undergrunts are in Mario Galaxy, so maybe it was intentional for the bats to be related to Swoops, but the Undergrunts to stay separate to Monty Mole. Besides, the Undergrunt species barely have anything in common with the Monty Mole species besides some similarities. The only major thing they share is a mole that throws wrenches and that is about it. Undergrunts are also never compared to Monty Mole species in any official English or Japanese guidebooks I know of (unless I am wrong). [[User:MontyMoleLoreMaster|MontyMoleLoreMaster]] ([[User talk:MontyMoleLoreMaster|talk]]) 23:09, December 13, 2021 (EST)
::The setting point is understandable. But the difference between comparing the bats and Swoop over Undergrunts and Monty Moles is that with the bats they do have an official filename that shares a Japanese name with Swoop. Undergrunts on the other hand have no filename that hints at them being Monty Mole species. If they were planned to be related, they would have probably used a Monty Mole-like filename instead of just generic Japanese mole names. Both the bats and Undergrunts are in Mario Galaxy, so maybe it was intentional for the bats to be related to Swoops, but the Undergrunts to stay separate to Monty Mole. Besides, the Undergrunt species barely have anything in common with the Monty Mole species besides some similarities. The only major thing they share is a mole that throws wrenches and that is about it. Undergrunts are also never compared to Monty Mole species in any official English or Japanese guidebooks I know of (unless I am wrong). [[User:MontyMoleLoreMaster|MontyMoleLoreMaster]] ([[User talk:MontyMoleLoreMaster|talk]]) 23:09, December 13, 2021 (EST)
:::They're relatives of Montys, where those enemies names are inspired by Monty Moles, so I think they're related by proxy. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 23:12, December 13, 2021 (EST)
:::They're relatives of Montys, so I think they're related by proxy. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 23:12, December 13, 2021 (EST)
::::Their Japanese name is just "Mogu" with no hint of something like Pū for example with most other Monty Mole species (not all of them apply to the Pū rule but still). The Monty name came from the Prima Guide, so it could have been an accidental translation error (like the Sumo and Sledge Bro mistake). The other Moles are just referred to as moles so it could be just a generic name. Besides, they act like Rocky Wrenches and not Monty Moles. They are also never referenced in being Monty Mole species in future games with no new additions to the species attack patterns or something. [[User:MontyMoleLoreMaster|MontyMoleLoreMaster]] ([[User talk:MontyMoleLoreMaster|talk]]) 23:17, December 13, 2021 (EST)
:::::Bro, I believe that we can’t just say this Mole species is 100% a Monty Mole species. There is no official confirmation so I believe that they are unrelated. We should only treat species as related if they have any official confirmation that states it, we should not call enemy species with no official confirmation as related with no full proof. So do not put the Undergrunts as Monty Moke relatives cause they are not. There is nothing that states them being related so we should not say they are related without proof of something calling them related (like with Ragumo). At least the Bats have confirmation, the Undergrunts have nothing. [[User:MontyMoleLoreMaster|MontyMoleLoreMaster]] ([[User talk:MontyMoleLoreMaster|talk]]) 23:33, December 13, 2021 (EST)
::::::Please don't coerce voters into your side by claiming your stance is the correct one around here. Use proper argumentative techniques to persuade voters rather than assert your position as the only correct one here. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 23:50, December 13, 2021 (EST)
:::::::Sorry about that, I just don’t think that these Moles are related, nor should we consider then related despite no official sources claiming it. I do not think we should just say their relatives straight away. I would at least wait until an official source says that they are related. Otherwise, we should just say they are comparable for now. No offense or anything, just want to make sure that we do not jump the shark and make such a bold claim with nothing backing it. Do you agree that this is the best option to do? [[User:MontyMoleLoreMaster|MontyMoleLoreMaster]] ([[User talk:MontyMoleLoreMaster|talk]]) 23:55, December 13, 2021 (EST)
 
There are several technical issues with this proposal that I want to point out before further voting and discussion happens, and this is directed at the current options and the way they are worded.
*The options are skewed towards your biases and need rewriting, especially Option 1, the one you're in favor in. Rewrite option 1 to say "They are unrelated to the Monty Mole species", remove the phrase regarding "concrete information".
*Option 2 is vague platitudes and is not a viable proposal option. Statements such as "I think" or "I believe" or "It might...." should never be options in a proposal where you vote because you believe strongly in a position, and the results are required to have a concrete effect.
*Option 3 is not a viable position to pick. Nobody cares that you don't care about the subject matter at hand, and there would be little tangible result if there was a voter who voted for that option, when the point of a proposal is to attain voters to change the wiki around. If you don't care about the subject matter, then don't vote, simple as that.
*Option 4 and 5 need rewording and needs to be condensed to be a more digestible position. Option 4 should just say "They are relatives of Monty Moles species." 5 can just say "Undergrunts are Monty Moles".
 
Please fix these problems to make your proposal much more presentable. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 00:08, December 14, 2021 (EST)
 
From your vote, I think they are related to Monty Moles. It’s quite obvious due to similar behaviors and similar design. I recommend giving a stronger vote. {{User:OhoJeeOnFire/sig}}
:They don't have much in common with Monty Moles since they have barely look the same, and they have completely different attack patterns to (excluding SMG Monty) which are never used in any future game by Monty Moles. They are also way bigger to them being the size of Mario. It seems like their a separate mole species with some inspiration on Monty Mole, but nothing more then some similarities. The SMG bats at least have an official source saying they are Swoop species, there is nothing like that for the Undergrunts. I think they should only be comparable at most, unless an official source states that they are Monty Mole species (like with Ragumo). They should only be called relatives or species of them if an official source says it, we do not say they are related only for similarities (that is why we only said they were comparable in the first place). For now, it seems like Undergrunts were made to be a separate species of moles. Also, one of them being named Monty is not a full proof answer for most likely being something from being probably an error from Prima Guide. The Prima Guide for Galaxy 1 never compared to them as Monty Moles and mostly just called them moles. Also, their Japanese and filenames only use generic words that mean mole like "Mogu". There is nothing in any Japanese sources that say that even hint at a relation to Monty Mole. [[User:MontyMoleLoreMaster|MontyMoleLoreMaster]] ([[User talk:MontyMoleLoreMaster|talk]]) 10:18, December 14, 2021 (EST)
 
Also, don't we not consider a species related to another unless there is an official confirmation that says they are related? The Mario Galaxy moles are not confirmed to be Monty Mole species at all (and no, one of them being named Monty does not count), so why should we consider them related when no official sources state them as such? That is also why comparing the relationship between Monty Moles and Undergrunts to Swoops and the SMG Bats is a bad comparison since one has an official source saying they are related and the other does not. Saying that Undergrunts are Monty Mole species is like saying the Mario RPG moles are Monty Mole species. Neither of those two species have official sources saying that they are related even if they very loosely look similar to Monty Moles. So I do not see why the Undergrunts should get a pass for this when other moles have similar behaviors and designs and are considered unrelated. [[User:MontyMoleLoreMaster|MontyMoleLoreMaster]] ([[User talk:MontyMoleLoreMaster|talk]]) 12:30, December 14, 2021 (EST)
 
Another thing I wanted to mention is that Monty Moles and Undergrunts barely look similar to each other. Undergrunts are at least twice the size of Monty Moles, Undergrunts have more triangular and bigger claws compared to Monty Mole’s more smaller claws, Undergrunts have multiple teeth while Monty Mole only has one tooth, Undergrunts have bulgy eyes instead of Monty Mole’s more closed eyes (even when Monty Mole’s eyes do open, they still look less bulgy), Undergrunts have more mouse/rat-like noses which do not even closely resemble the Monty Mole noses seen in Super Mario World besides being long, Undergrunts have whiskers on their nose while Monty Moles have them on their face, Undergrunts have cheeks on their face which Super Mario World Monty Moles had on the side of their face instead, and finally, Undergrunts are a much darker brown compared to Monty Moles. Undergrunts do not even closely resemble Monty Moles in anyways besides small similarities like a belly pattern. I do not see why people think that Undergrunts are meant to look like Monty Moles, since it is clearly obvious that they look completely different just by comparing the two. This could also probably be intentional to make them look different to Monty Mole, since like I said, their file and Japanese names have no hints of them being Monty Moles and are just generic mole names. Which probably subtly states that they are a completely separate species of moles meant for space with no relation to Monty Mole. So yeah, Undergrunts barely even resemble Monty Moles or even their Super Mario World design. [[User:MontyMoleLoreMaster|MontyMoleLoreMaster]] ([[User talk:MontyMoleLoreMaster|talk]]) 20:37, December 14, 2021 (EST)
 
First of all, they are related due to way similar actions between them, as both dig through the ground, they also look quite similar to each other. Of course, some people can’t tell the similarities, but both have a long nose, have eyes at the front of their heads in modern designs, have brown fur, have a very short tail, and have a grassland as their natural habitat. I understand your points, but I still think they are related. {{User:OhoJeeOnFire/sig}}
 
==Regarding the above==
OK, first off: Happy New Year! Secondly, I'm confused about what this proposal means exactly. The option that passed is "They are related or are relatives to the Monty Mole species." Indeed, it states that "Undergrunts are relatives/related" right in green text. However, the "related" (now shown as "comparable") parameter in the species infobox is separate from "relatives" technically, which is why I suggested to split that option. Basically, as long as Undergrunt and Monty Mole are listed as either related or relatives, then the proposal is being followed. This actually means that no change needs to happen, as they are already listed as related/comparable. The first option seems like it was meant to take them off their respective infoboxes entirely, and I guess the third option would have merged them. Am I reading this correctly? If they are to be relisted as relatives, would that also affect Monty and Rocky Wrench? Should we then reconsider the relation between Monty Mole and Rocky Wrench, who would appear to have a closer, more direct relation than ''Super Mario Galaxy'' enemies? Or, if Undergrunt and Monty Mole are to remain related, then should we take base Monty and Monty Mole off their infoboxes? The Monty Mole infobox is big enough as it is, and Monty is more comparable to Rocky Wrench in some ways, including the original plainer cheeks. I would ask the proposal creator to clarify, but...in the words of Bowser: "Run that past me again!" [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 08:03, January 1, 2022 (EST)
:I still think "comparable" is more ideal. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 08:08, January 1, 2022 (EST)

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)