Editing Talk:Tentacle
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Merge Tentacle into [[Blooper]]== | ==Merge Tentacle into [[Blooper]]== | ||
{{ | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">MERGE 5-0</span> | |||
Tentacles are explicitly mentioned in this very article to be no more than the limbs of Bloopers, and the [[L. Tentacle]] and [[R. Tentacle]] links already redirect to the main [[Blooper]] article instead of this one. I really don't think a Blooper's arms deserve a seperate article just because the player may be able to target them in one game. Any usable information from this article should be merged into [[Blooper]] if not already mentioned there. | Tentacles are explicitly mentioned in this very article to be no more than the limbs of Bloopers, and the [[L. Tentacle]] and [[R. Tentacle]] links already redirect to the main [[Blooper]] article instead of this one. I really don't think a Blooper's arms deserve a seperate article just because the player may be able to target them in one game. Any usable information from this article should be merged into [[Blooper]] if not already mentioned there. | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Alright, I merged usable stuff from this into [[Blooper]]. Not much remained, mainly the fact that Bloopers use tentacles to move and the picture from the article; the rest of the information was either already mentioned, superfluous or incorrect. I don't know what is to be done with the talk page though; can someone please tell me? (And shouldn't this proposal be marked as being over?)--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 10:52, 16 January 2010 (EST) | Alright, I merged usable stuff from this into [[Blooper]]. Not much remained, mainly the fact that Bloopers use tentacles to move and the picture from the article; the rest of the information was either already mentioned, superfluous or incorrect. I don't know what is to be done with the talk page though; can someone please tell me? (And shouldn't this proposal be marked as being over?)--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 10:52, 16 January 2010 (EST) | ||