Editing Talk:TEC

Now wait. How can TEC-xx have a gender? [[User:The Writing Guy|TWG]]
:I have no idea. So should I change him and other male proverbs to it?

==Coloring TEC's quotes==
While I love the idea, it is very difficult to read on a white background. It should probably be changed back. --[[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 20:09, July 30, 2024 (EDT)
:Agreed, there is little reason for this flavor text to be green at all. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 20:55, July 30, 2024 (EDT)
::Maybe I should have made the text a darker green but I don't mind. -[[User:Jude da Dude]]

== Move to TEC ==
{{settled TPP}}
{{proposal outcome|passed|14-0|Move to TEC}}
Following the recently passed proposals for Bobbery and Grodus, this is another Thousand-Year Door subject whose name needs to be looked at. The name TEC-XX only comes up when he first meets Peach, and the exact quote is "I am the TEC-XX. Many call me TEC." Following that "TEC" is what he's always called everywhere else in the game, and does appear to be the intended name for TEC as a character rather than TEC-XX which could just be the system name.

'''Proposer''': {{User|Nightwicked Bowser}}<br>
'''Deadline''': September 16, 2024, 23:59 (GMT)

===Support===
#{{User|Nightwicked Bowser}} Per proposal
#{{User|Technetium}} Maybe people will think TEC is short for Technetium then - just kidding. Per proposal.
#{{User|Tails777}} Man I wish I had a witty support reasoning, but I don't. Per proposal.
#{{User|RHG1951}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Camwoodstock}} Per proposal. Seems only fair.
#{{User|Scrooge200}} I can only remember one time in the game they actually call him TEC-XX instead of just TEC. Per proposal.
#{{User|Jude da Dude}} Per proposal it is.
#{{User|Sparks}} Per all.
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all.
#{{User|Nintendo101}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Killer Moth}} Per all.
#{{User|FanOfRosalina2007}} We could just mention that his full name is TEC-XX in the opening sentence, perhaps? Per all.
#{{User|Waddle Dingus}} Per all.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.

===Oppose===


===Comments===
I've been having similar thoughts on Lord Crump's page too. Do you think it should also undergo the same treatment? - [[User:Jude da Dude]]
:Probably not, "Lord Crump" is his target name in battle and Goombella calls him that in her email at the end of the game. {{User:Nightwicked Bowser/sig}} 13:11, September 2, 2024 (EDT)
::Yeah, he's almost always called Lord Crump. I mentioned this on Grodus's talk page I believe, but they even changed an instance of "Crump" to "Lord Crump" in the remake. [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 13:26, September 2, 2024 (EDT)
::: I have a question. Couldn't we just move the pages to the name they're always called normally instead of needing a proposal? [[User:PrincessPeachFan|PrincessPeachFan]] ([[User talk:PrincessPeachFan|talk]]) 08:58, September 3, 2024 (EDT)
::::If it were that easy, then I would have done it already. There are cases where other users would disagree with a move without there being a discussion and would move the page back so a proposal is the best necessary way to get an agreement for each case. The Koopalings' articles for example probably would have been moved to their shorter names but the latest proposal on the matter didn't pass so their articles have not been moved. My entire point is, we cannot just make these kind of changes on a whim and doing so is a level 2 offense in [[MarioWiki:Warning policy]]. {{User:Nightwicked Bowser/sig}} 09:26, September 3, 2024 (EDT)
In response to FanOfRosalina2007, yes, we do put the full name in the opening (see [[Flurrie]] for instance) - we lead with the full name and then state what they are more commonly known as. [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 18:10, September 5, 2024 (EDT)
:Alright, thanks. (That should have been obvious to me, but it slipped my mind.) -- {{User:FanOfRosalina2007/sig}} 22:20, September 9, 2024 (EDT)