Editing Talk:Strollin' Stu

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 79: Line 79:
:Because, we already have a bunch of tiny articles all over the place, and adding one doesn't help solve the problem. Also, there's no point in splitting it because someone's just going to look at it and propose it be merged. Why don't we just merge the other two stacks? Instead of adding yet another page, we lose two and merge it elsewhere. {{User|Coooool123}}
:Because, we already have a bunch of tiny articles all over the place, and adding one doesn't help solve the problem. Also, there's no point in splitting it because someone's just going to look at it and propose it be merged. Why don't we just merge the other two stacks? Instead of adding yet another page, we lose two and merge it elsewhere. {{User|Coooool123}}
::Can you please tell me where these tiny articles are in the context of this proposal? The articles that are linked to in the proposal are of adequate size. Not FA-worthy, but not stub-worthy. And Zero, have you already forgotten about [[Giant Ninji]], [[Giant Kirby]], and [[Giant Donkey Kong]]? All of them had proposals to merge them, since they are larger variations of other characters, and you supported all of them. [[User:GreenDisaster|GreenDisaster]] 12:46, 26 June 2012 (EDT)
::Can you please tell me where these tiny articles are in the context of this proposal? The articles that are linked to in the proposal are of adequate size. Not FA-worthy, but not stub-worthy. And Zero, have you already forgotten about [[Giant Ninji]], [[Giant Kirby]], and [[Giant Donkey Kong]]? All of them had proposals to merge them, since they are larger variations of other characters, and you supported all of them. [[User:GreenDisaster|GreenDisaster]] 12:46, 26 June 2012 (EDT)
:::The articles are the ones mentioned above: the [[Shy Stack]] and the [[Goomba Tower]]. They could totally be merged with no problem. They're small enough, and barely 200 words. And like I said before: this is going to just be a giant game of volleyball. The proposal passes, then they're split. Someone sees this proposal awhile later, makes a new proposal to merge them, it passes, and the cycle continues. Leaving it as is would be the best way to avoid this. {{User|Coooool123}}
:::The articles are the ones mentioned above: the [[Shy Stack]] and the [[Goomba Tower]]. They could totally be merged with no problem. They're small enough, and barely 200words. And like I said before: this is going to just be a giant game of volleyball. The proposal passes, then they're split. Someone sees this proposal awhile later, makes a new proposal to merge them, it passes, and the cycle continues. Leaving it as is would be the best way to avoid this. {{User|Coooool123}}
::::You cannot predict the future. So far, you are the only person that thinks somewhere down the line, they'll be remerged. Right now, the only game of volleyball that's happening is the one between you and me. Bring me proof that this will happen and I'll be quiet. Also, the articles you mentioned aren't even that short. 200 words is a bit too much for a lot of articles. [[User:GreenDisaster|GreenDisaster]] 13:43, 28 June 2012 (EDT)
::::You cannot predict the future. So far, you are the only person that thinks somewhere down the line, they'll be remerged. Right now, the only game of volleyball that's happening is the one between you and me. Bring me proof that this will happen and I'll be quiet. Also, the articles you mentioned aren't even that short. 200 words is a bit too much for a lot of articles. [[User:GreenDisaster|GreenDisaster]] 13:43, 28 June 2012 (EDT)
:::::You're right, I can't predict the future. But I'm sure that there are other mariowiki users that want the smallest number of tiny pages as possible. People argued against splitting the Goomba Stack from the Goomba section in a talk page proposal. If those people argued about that, then why wouldn't they argue about splitting a perfectly good article from becoming two tiny stubs (more or less)? The Goomba Stack article would be larger than the Giant Stu article. There's barely any information on it, so there's no point in splitting. It would be unnecessary and a space waster. {{User|Coooool123}}
: Coulos someone create "[[Stackin' Stu]]" for me PLZ?(maybe it could be someone who voted 'yes') {{User:CatJedi/sig}}
: Coulos someone create "[[Stackin' Stu]]" for me PLZ?(maybe it could be someone who voted 'yes') {{User:CatJedi/sig}}
::The deadline has not been reached yet. This proposal started on June 23rd and runs for two weeks, so it ends on July 7th. {{User:Mario4Ever/sig}}
::The deadline has not been reached yet. This proposal started on June 23rd and runs for two weeks, so it ends on July 7th. {{User:Mario4Ever/sig}}

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)