Editing Talk:Spike Top
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 306: | Line 306: | ||
:It'd be variant, as that was previously "derived species." I still occasionally use that wording in discussion when it flows better. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 12:58, May 22, 2024 (EDT) | :It'd be variant, as that was previously "derived species." I still occasionally use that wording in discussion when it flows better. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 12:58, May 22, 2024 (EDT) | ||
::I see, thanks for explaning. Hrm, I want to support this, but there's one thing bugging me. And it's not about this proposal specifically, so I'll probably support it anyway, but... According to [[:Template:Species infobox]], A is considered a variant of B if A is a subtype of B. That's presumably why Goombrat is not a variant of Goomba, despite, you know, everything about it, because a bio says "Nobody is quite sure of their exact relation to Goombas." And, well, we can't exactly be sure of Spike Top's relation to Spiny, can we? It is known that Spike Tops are Buzzy Beetles (with spikes), but not that they're also Spinies (even if they are clearly also based on them). And all of this is making me ask what the word "variant" is even taken to mean. [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 15:02, May 24, 2024 (EDT) | ::I see, thanks for explaning. Hrm, I want to support this, but there's one thing bugging me. And it's not about this proposal specifically, so I'll probably support it anyway, but... According to [[:Template:Species infobox]], A is considered a variant of B if A is a subtype of B. That's presumably why Goombrat is not a variant of Goomba, despite, you know, everything about it, because a bio says "Nobody is quite sure of their exact relation to Goombas." And, well, we can't exactly be sure of Spike Top's relation to Spiny, can we? It is known that Spike Tops are Buzzy Beetles (with spikes), but not that they're also Spinies (even if they are clearly also based on them). And all of this is making me ask what the word "variant" is even taken to mean. [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 15:02, May 24, 2024 (EDT) | ||
:::That's a bit of an issue with taking "these aren't the same as | :::That's a bit of an issue with taking "these aren't the same as these" in bios at 100% face-value, ultimately. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 15:05, May 24, 2024 (EDT) | ||
Concurrently, Spike Tops are considered "relatives" of Spinies, and vice versa, whereas Buzzy Beetles don't have any relatives (beyond their variants of course), even though this proposal states that Spinies and Buzzies are clearly related. If this proposal passes, would that mean that Buzzy Beetles will be considered relatives of Spinies in place, on top of Spike Top being considered a variant of both? {{User:Arend/sig}} 12:27, May 23, 2024 (EDT) | Concurrently, Spike Tops are considered "relatives" of Spinies, and vice versa, whereas Buzzy Beetles don't have any relatives (beyond their variants of course), even though this proposal states that Spinies and Buzzies are clearly related. If this proposal passes, would that mean that Buzzy Beetles will be considered relatives of Spinies in place, on top of Spike Top being considered a variant of both? {{User:Arend/sig}} 12:27, May 23, 2024 (EDT) |