Editing Talk:Small Chomp
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:::::::::::::::Here's my question - did [[MarioWiki talk:Naming#Make an exception to source priority for articles with identical names|this proposal]] apply to foreign names? If so, then I suggest leaving it as Mini Wanwan, since it's pretty clear that "Chomp" is one of the Prima guide's oversights (along with grouping together the other scaled enemies, suddenly flipping Prickly Piranha Plant's name to Spiky Piranha Plant, completely neglecting the other Beamer enemies, etc.). If not, then Chomp (small) it is. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 06:45, 17 February 2019 (EST) | :::::::::::::::Here's my question - did [[MarioWiki talk:Naming#Make an exception to source priority for articles with identical names|this proposal]] apply to foreign names? If so, then I suggest leaving it as Mini Wanwan, since it's pretty clear that "Chomp" is one of the Prima guide's oversights (along with grouping together the other scaled enemies, suddenly flipping Prickly Piranha Plant's name to Spiky Piranha Plant, completely neglecting the other Beamer enemies, etc.). If not, then Chomp (small) it is. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 06:45, 17 February 2019 (EST) | ||
:::::::::::::::I reached out to the proposer and got the answer that it applied to foreign names; in light of this, let's leave it as Mini Wanwan for now. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 09:28, 17 February 2019 (EST) | :::::::::::::::I reached out to the proposer and got the answer that it applied to foreign names; in light of this, let's leave it as Mini Wanwan for now. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 09:28, 17 February 2019 (EST) | ||
::::::::::::::::Doc von Schmeltwick once told me that a Super Mario Encyclopedia counterproposal | ::::::::::::::::Doc von Schmeltwick once told me that a Super Mario Encyclopedia counterproposal wouldn't work, as it wouldn't pass given the margin of the original and it would annoy people. (i noticed that most of those who opposed are inactive recently though), so yeah, i think we should keep-as-is, at least, for now. I don't think you'd agree for a counterproposal either, so we keep-as-is too. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:33, 17 February 2019 (EST) | ||