Editing Talk:Shitamachi Ninjō Gekijō
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::::As I have said multiple times, I CANNOT give definitive proof as the rom is being passed around in a small group of Japanese collectors. They don't want to release the ROM. Magazine releases on the Satellaview were VERY common and many others were made. Search up Satellaview magazine and you will know what I'm talking about. [[User:Howzit]] 21:56, 11 January 2018 (EST) | ::::As I have said multiple times, I CANNOT give definitive proof as the rom is being passed around in a small group of Japanese collectors. They don't want to release the ROM. Magazine releases on the Satellaview were VERY common and many others were made. Search up Satellaview magazine and you will know what I'm talking about. [[User:Howzit]] 21:56, 11 January 2018 (EST) | ||
:::::'''sigh''' Do any of them have a website or something? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:03, 11 January 2018 (EST) | :::::'''sigh''' Do any of them have a website or something? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:03, 11 January 2018 (EST) | ||
::::::Also, you seem to be misinterpreting my goal here. My goal is to get something to cite this with, not have this page deleted or you | ::::::Also, you seem to be misinterpreting my goal here. My goal is to get something to cite this with, not have this page deleted or you decredited. Anything will do. Magazine scans, statement from the current owners, those will all work. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:22, 11 January 2018 (EST) | ||
fyi, the "admin approval" was in regard ot hosting a page with sexual and decidely kid-unfriendly content and not about verifying the "authencity" of the subject matter. | fyi, the "admin approval" was in regard ot hosting a page with sexual and decidely kid-unfriendly content and not about verifying the "authencity" of the subject matter. |