Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 147: |
Line 147: |
|
| |
|
| ==Include Rainbow Coaster & Rainbow Downhill back in the article== | | ==Include Rainbow Coaster & Rainbow Downhill back in the article== |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | {{TPP}} |
| {{Proposal outcome|failed|6-9|don't include}}
| |
| This decision was made almost two decades ago, and it doesn't feel right at all. What are Rainbow Coaster and Rainbow Downhill if not Rainbow Roads? I propose that we include them back in the article. --[[User:Conradd|Conradd]] ([[User talk:Conradd|talk]]) 02:39, April 29, 2024 (EDT) | | This decision was made almost two decades ago, and it doesn't feel right at all. What are Rainbow Coaster and Rainbow Downhill if not Rainbow Roads? I propose that we include them back in the article. --[[User:Conradd|Conradd]] ([[User talk:Conradd|talk]]) 02:39, April 29, 2024 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| '''Proposer''': {{User|Conradd}}<br> | | '''Proposer''': {{User|Conradd}}<br> |
| '''Deadline''': <s>May 28th, 2024, 23:59 GMT</s> June 4th, 2024, 23:59 GMT | | '''Deadline''': May 28th, 2024, 23:59 GMT |
|
| |
|
| ===Support=== | | ===Support=== |
Line 168: |
Line 167: |
| #{{User|Tails777}} Per Hewer. A mention should definitely happen, but the different names definitely say they're not meant to be treated as the same trend. | | #{{User|Tails777}} Per Hewer. A mention should definitely happen, but the different names definitely say they're not meant to be treated as the same trend. |
| #{{User|Ray Trace}} I can see both sides here but I'm leaning on this side. | | #{{User|Ray Trace}} I can see both sides here but I'm leaning on this side. |
| #{{User|Nintendo101}} Per all. Probably worth mentioning, but if they wanted them to be Rainbow Roads, they probably would have referred to them as such.
| |
| #{{User|Blinker}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|MegaBowser64}} Purr all
| |
| #{{User|Power Flotzo}} Per everyone.
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Comments=== | | ===Comments=== |
Line 223: |
Line 218: |
| ::::::::::::::::::::1, ONLY in the original Japanese? 2 (if the answer to 1 is yes), just having it named Mario Circuit in 1 language is not something that a argument should be based on. 3(regardless of the answer to 1), names aren't everything. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 16:52, May 23, 2024 (EDT) | | ::::::::::::::::::::1, ONLY in the original Japanese? 2 (if the answer to 1 is yes), just having it named Mario Circuit in 1 language is not something that a argument should be based on. 3(regardless of the answer to 1), names aren't everything. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 16:52, May 23, 2024 (EDT) |
| :::::::::::::::::::::The Japanese, simplified Chinese, traditional Chinese, Korean, and Russian terminology for Mario Raceway and other "Raceway" courses is identical to the term used for the "circuit" courses of other games. Even if they ''weren't'', these games are developed by Japanese people, not Germans or Spaniards or Anglophones, so it would be culturally shortsighted to prioritize foreign languages' names over the Japanese ones for this purpose. And "names aren't everything" doesn't magically become true the third time you say it because '''they absolutely are'''. It's not working. Stop saying it. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 17:12, May 23, 2024 (EDT) | | :::::::::::::::::::::The Japanese, simplified Chinese, traditional Chinese, Korean, and Russian terminology for Mario Raceway and other "Raceway" courses is identical to the term used for the "circuit" courses of other games. Even if they ''weren't'', these games are developed by Japanese people, not Germans or Spaniards or Anglophones, so it would be culturally shortsighted to prioritize foreign languages' names over the Japanese ones for this purpose. And "names aren't everything" doesn't magically become true the third time you say it because '''they absolutely are'''. It's not working. Stop saying it. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 17:12, May 23, 2024 (EDT) |
| ::::::::::::::::::::::Fine, merge the "raceway" courses with their "circuit" counterparts in a way like so we have a page like Rainbow Road or Mario Circuit. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 21:03, May 23, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::::::::::::We already have. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 22:12, May 23, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::::::::::Really? I'm pretty sure there's at least one that's not. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 09:15, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::::::::::::::Nope, Mario Raceway is a [[Mario Circuit]] and Luigi Raceway is a [[Luigi Circuit]]. The only one of MK64's oddly translated "raceways" that isn't on one of these collective articles is Royal Raceway (Peach Circuit), but that's because there's only one other Peach Circuit course, and two courses sharing a name isn't enough to have a collective article about them, otherwise we'd need one for Sherbet Land, Wario Stadium, and (going by Japanese names) Sky Garden. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 09:34, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::::::::::::For Wario Stadium, what about Waluigi Stadium? "...and two courses sharing a name isn't enough to have a collective article about them..." Yeah, and 2 games isn't enough for a series. Tell that to [[Mario + Rabbids (series)]]. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 09:50, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::::::::::::::::What ''about'' Waluigi Stadium? It's just another case of two courses sharing a name. If your argument is that we should count the Waluigi Stadiums as Wario Stadiums, I strongly disagree, for the same reason Luigi Circuit, Toad Circuit, and Mario Kart Stadium aren't Mario Circuit, and, indeed, Rainbow Coaster and Rainbow Downhill aren't Rainbow Road. And game series articles are a totally irrelevant case with no relation whatsoever to what I said or to this discussion, you're clearly reaching for arguments now. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 10:29, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Ok, now you're trying to get me angry. You've seen my arguments, I've seen yours, why are you just picking them apart like a scientist when that's not how it should be? [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 10:31, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::...What? I'm not "trying to get you angry", I am pointing out the flaws in the arguments you've given. That's what a debate is. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 10:37, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::And I'm pointing out your flaws, but you keep ignoring that. I say names aren't everything, but you still argue/debate as if names are everything. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 10:40, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I'm not ignoring your arguments, I'm making counterarguments to them (which is what you were just complaining about). To that end, I already addressed the "names aren't everything" idea above: "While names may not be everything in every case, if they aren't the defining factor here, then what is? Pretty much the only thing connecting all the Rainbow Roads on the article besides their names is that they're some kind of floating rainbow-coloured path, and I'd be shocked if there weren't more of those in the franchise not covered here because they're not called Rainbow Road. Again, a rainbow road isn't necessarily a Rainbow Road." {{User:Hewer/sig}} 10:51, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::And when I said "names aren't everything", I mean we don't cover things but have the organization based off of names alone, which is what the oppose side is using. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 12:49, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Once again, already addressed: "While names may not be everything in every case, if they aren't the defining factor here, then what is?" It's true that not ''everything'' on the wiki has its organisation solely determined by the name, but in this case, this is an article about a recurring (type of) location where the very thing that defines it is the "Rainbow Road" name, and everything else varies between iterations. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 13:02, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Ok, how about the criteria I put? Rainbow Coaster AND Rainbow Downhill are both rainbows AND roads. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 13:29, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Hewer has addressed this several times, but you haven't addressed it yet: there are a lot of things that are both rainbows and roads in the ''Mario'' series. Do not tell me you think it would be worthwhile for this article to cover [[Rainbow Ride]], all nine [[Rainbow Course]]s, [[Rainbow Skywalk]], [[Rainbow Run (level)|Rainbow Run]], and [[Rainbow Dream]]. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 15:03, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::None of those are roads, so even though they're rainbows, they're not Rainbow Roads. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 15:11, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Oh, convenient. Personally, I fail to see how linear paths made of rainbows are not roads that are also rainbows. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 15:22, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Oh, so you think SIDEWALKS are roads because they're linear paths? [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 15:44, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| Ok I'll reset the indent because these comments are starting to get cut off on my screen. Anyway, I fail to see what possible definition of "road" you could be using that includes everything currently on the Rainbow Road article but excludes everything Ahemtoday mentioned. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 15:51, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :I don't want to get caught up in litigating the definition of a "road", so I'll say: maybe the difference is that Rainbow Roads are named "Rainbow Road". [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 17:04, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::But race courses that are both Rainbows and roads like Rainbow Coaster aren't Rainbow Roads. Who's to say the intent WAS to have them be the MKAGP/2/DX/VR equivalents of Rainbow Road!? [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 18:09, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::If they're only Rainbow Road '''equivalents''', then they're not Rainbow Roads. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 18:25, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::We have zero stake in this--we remain firmly in the camp of "if we can acknowledge the movie, we should at least put the Arcade GP Rainbow courses ''somewhere'' here instead of just the See also up top"--but to play devil's advocate: is Mario Raceway the "equivalent" to a Mario Circuit? And is that a question that actually has any meaningful answer beyond personal semantics? {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 18:58, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::Mario Raceway is a Mario Circuit outright in the original Japanese. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 19:49, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::At the risk of Devil's Advocate-ing a bit too close to the sun: Say ''Mario Kart 9'' drops, and at the end of that game's Special Cup, the course is '''not''' directly named "Rainbow Road", instead being called something like "Rainbow Circuit" or something similar starting with "Rainbow" and ending with another word--it is based upon Rainbow Road both visually and in terms of gameplay, but it is not called "Rainbow Road". It is also not called Rainbow Road in Japanese. Ignoring how this would basically never happen if Nintendo made a ''Mario Kart 9'' for a moment, would we exclude this track from this article just on the name alone?<br>On a less Devil's Advocate-y note, though, we do think it's worth noting that Special Cup just flat-out does not exist in the Arcade GP games; the [[Rainbow Cup]] that features these two Rainbow Road-likes more-or-less fully replaces it. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 22:27, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::I mean, yeah, that sounds like exactly the same situation as Rainbow Coaster and Rainbow Downhill, so I think we'd do the same thing with "Rainbow Circuit" as well. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 02:00, May 25, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::I've been arguing from the start that we should include more of a mention of Rainbow Coaster and Rainbow Downhill on the article on account of them obviously being based on Rainbow Roads, but with different names to indicate they are not themselves Rainbow Roads. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 19:53, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::Let me offer my two cents that should settle this debate about "Rainbow Roads and rainbow roads". On this Wiki, the technical semantics are currently highly-valued for Wiki policy and consistency. That is, a "Big Goomba" is not the same as a "Goomba". As a result, a rainbow road doesn't directly make it a Rainbow Road. So, "Big Goomba" exists on its own page and any Big Goomba-specific information can be left on its own page. However, Big Goomba can still be mentioned on Goomba's page; for example, in the ''[[Goomba#Super Mario Bros. Wonder|Super Mario Bros. Wonder]]'' section of Goomba's page, the Goomba variants are mentioned. So, there's no point in debating this here, unless you want the Goomba page to include ''all'' Goomba-related information, including Big Goombas, Bone Goombas, etc. (And to be clear, I still believe this Rainbow Road page should mention Rainbow Coaster and Downhill in its main body.) [[User:MarioComix|MarioComix]] ([[User talk:MarioComix|talk]]) 02:03, May 25, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::Yeah, that's a great way to explain it. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 02:20, May 25, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::Again, just to be clear, I agree with you and also want the same thing to happen. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 04:00, May 25, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Since Conradd never elaborated what he specifically meant by "inclusion", nor had come up on the wiki at all (let alone return to his proposal to explain) in the past few weeks since creating this proposal, I am unsure what would happen if this proposal ''fails''. He never elaborated on whether supporting his proposal means Rainbow Coaster and Rainbow Downhill will be treated the exact same as all other Rainbow Roads or it just needs to be mentioned; which means he ''also'' never elaborated on ''opposing'' it whether means if it can still be mentioned or is entirely forbidden on the page. Basically, he never elaborated on if the options are a hard support/oppose or soft support/oppose.<br>I almost feel inclined to simply mention Rainbow Coaster and Rainbow Downhill the same way [[Special:Diff/4224936|I mentioned Mario Highway/Mario Beach and Splash Circuit on the Mario Circuit page]] regardless of the outcome, since that seems what most people want on ''both'' sides of this proposal, but again, since I'm not sure if the options are hard support/oppose or soft support/oppose, I don't know if that's out of line. {{User:Arend/sig}} 11:21, May 28, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :I think that if "Oppose" wins, it means that Coaster/Downhill can only be briefly mentioned on the page but no further information should be included besides their names and that they appear in the ''Arcade GP'' games (e.g. "In the ''Arcade GP'' games, no Rainbow Road courses appear, but two similar courses, Coaster and Downhill, appear instead"). If "Support" wins, that would allow more inclusion of Coaster/Downhill to have their own gallery below the main one, referring to the ''Arcade GP'' subseries, which explains that these are Rainbow Road-like courses. I think the intent of whether the mention of Coaster/Downhill is trying to redirect you to their pages (Oppose wins) or is including their info on this page, but you can go to their page for further info (Support wins), is a key point here. (However, I am not fluent on the proposal rules, so am not 100% sure if this flouts the rules or anything.) [[User:MarioComix|MarioComix]] ([[User talk:MarioComix|talk]]) 00:58, May 29, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :I'm in support of having an acknowledgement of Coaster and Downhill on the article like what Arend added to the Mario Circuit page, I feel like that should be doable even if this proposal fails. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 07:44, May 29, 2024 (EDT)
| |