Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{Notforumtalk}} |
|
| |
|
| ==Possible Cowgirl Peach...?== | | ==Possible Cowgirl Peach...?== |
Line 78: |
Line 79: |
|
| |
|
| Okay, let me get this clear: '''the "enemies and obstacles" section needs severe expanding!!!''' The game already came out a few weeks ago, and I really, REALLY think the "enemies and obstacles" should be expanded from the so little it covers now. PLEASE do this! {{User:Mariofan28047/sig}} 15:55, April 5, 2024 (EDT) | | Okay, let me get this clear: '''the "enemies and obstacles" section needs severe expanding!!!''' The game already came out a few weeks ago, and I really, REALLY think the "enemies and obstacles" should be expanded from the so little it covers now. PLEASE do this! {{User:Mariofan28047/sig}} 15:55, April 5, 2024 (EDT) |
| :Because the game just came out, many people are still playing the game. As a result, it might be a while before the "Enemies and obstacles" section is complete. If you wish, you could help expand it if you own the game. -- {{User:FanOfRosalina2007/sig}} 14:35, April 14, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::Don't worry - I'll help! I'll add the enemies and bosses I've uploaded images for. {{User:Sparks/sig}} 14:37, April 14, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::In my eyes personally, [[Princess Peach: Showtime!#Characters]] already has a massive overweight of antagonists contra protagonists (21 to 4), so I'm thinking that there'd be more reason to add more friendly characters, than to add enemy characters. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 01:32, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Ancient language ==
| |
|
| |
| Can we add a alphabet for the in game ancient language [[Special:Contributions/174.242.40.57|174.242.40.57]] 12:45, April 6, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :Presuming it's about the stone exhibitions in [[The Case of the Missing Mural]], I personally think it'd be impractical at best, even more so as there's no sounds associated with those letters. Same unfortunately goes for what is apparently the [[Theet]]s' current-day written language, which is used in e.g. the newspaper Peach reads in [[The Case of the Rainy-Day Plot]], and in some of Sparkle Theater's posters. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 11:14, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==Replace the level list on the main Princess Peach: Showtime! page with a link to, or incorporation of, the Sparkle Theater page==
| |
| {{Settled TPP}}
| |
| {{Proposal outcome|failed|0-6}}
| |
| The edit in question would be big enough that it'd likely raise eyebrows if I had done it with no forewarning, so it likely warrants a talk page proposal instead:
| |
|
| |
| Essentially, the level list at [[Princess Peach: Showtime!#Plays]], has been completely outclassed in info and details by the level list at [[Sparkle Theater]], and more info may well be added to the latter page at a later time.
| |
|
| |
| As a result of that, the former's list as it currently stands, does not make sense in my eyes to keep in the state it is at the time of writing (A simple table with floors and level names).
| |
|
| |
| There's only two options I can personally vouch for, which are pretty similar to each other:
| |
|
| |
| ===Option 1: Replace the entire Showtime page's list with a link to Sparkle Theater===
| |
| This is one I know from Wikipedia, which has a concept of "Main article:". The way I think of it, the entire "Plays" section would be replaced with a "Main article:", for example, if I remember Wikipedia's syntaxing correctly:
| |
| <code><nowiki>==Plays==</nowiki></code><br>
| |
| <code><nowiki>{{Main|Sparkle Theater}}</nowiki></code><br><br>
| |
| And maybe one or two images like e.g. [[:File:PPS Sparkle Theater 1F.png]] on its right.
| |
|
| |
| ===Option 2: Also center the list around a link to Sparkle Theater, but with some more text summaries and images added to Showtime's list===
| |
| This one is a bit more abstract to explain. The same <code><nowiki>{{Main|Sparkle Theater}}</nowiki></code> as in Option 1 would be placed on the top of the section, but the current list would be allowed to remain, along with some text above the list that would say something like "''Princess Peach: Showtime'' has 40 levels in total, with Sparkle Theater being the hub between them. The five main floors contain a shows with a rotation of with different transformations, while the basement contains the third and final levels for each transformation." As well as two- or three-ish images on the right.
| |
|
| |
| '''Proposer''': {{User|DandelionSprout}}<br>
| |
| '''Deadline''': May 10, 2024, 23:59 GMT
| |
|
| |
| ====Support====
| |
| #{{User|DandelionSprout}} The current list just looks too simple, compared to the very detailed list on the Sparkle Theater page.
| |
|
| |
| ====Oppose====
| |
| #{{User|Nightwicked Bowser}} Game articles typically include full level lists regardless if there are other articles that list them, including all Super Mario platformer articles.
| |
| #{{User|ExoRosalina}} Is this even necessary? Some plays have better options just like in other platformer pages. I have yet checked Super Mario Galaxy (including 2) have both levels and Galaxy page have those similar issues.
| |
| #{{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} Per above. Also, there is no option choosing.
| |
| #{{User|Power Flotzo}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|FanOfRosalina2007}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|EvieMaybe}} if this passed, would we also take the levels out of SM3DW's page and put them in the sprixie kingdom page?
| |
|
| |
| ====Comments====
| |
| Uhhh, this proposal doesn't let you choose which option they want. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 08:15, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :I had to guess a fair bit for what the format for my first ever talk page proposal would be, and [[MarioWiki:Proposals#Basic_proposal_and_support.2Foppose_format]] didn't seem to account for multi-option procedures, sadly. 😓 [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 11:09, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::You don't have to keep the format as provided on the Proposals page word-for-word: you can change a few things that befit your proposal better as you set it up. Looking at previous multiple-option proposals, for example, you can replace the Support and Oppose sections with an "Option 1" section, an "Option 2" section, and a "Do nothing" section. {{User:Arend/sig}} 12:07, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::Yeah, you don't HAVE to. When I make multi-option proposals, I put in the initial format, then change it to fit the proposal. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 13:49, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == A Grape Error ==
| |
|
| |
| The link to the Grape (character) article in the description for the Sour Bunch erroneously leads to the article for grapes (the item / food)
| |
| [[User:Breather|Breather]] ([[User talk:Breather|talk]]) 17:19, June 27, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :This has been taken care of. Thanks for noticing! -- {{User:FanOfRosalina2007/sig}} 19:22, July 3, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==Would the mentions of The Guardian's baffling review be considered okay to remove?==
| |
| After I googled "times tables" with an S and saw it referred to multiplication tables, the already horrendously written review by them became outright fraudulent in my eyes. The reviewer thought there were only two [[Figure Skater Peach]] stages in the game (Anyone who've played 90min of the game can tell there's three), and goes absurdly far to equate female-styled games with toddler shovelware as if he hadn't played any games with female leads since 2011 Wii games. At this point I have my doubts as to whether he even played the game.<br><br>Accordingly, I feel a large part of the Reception section could or even should be removed, but since even extremely negative reviews have stayed up on other pages ([[Mario Party]], [[Mario Party Advance]]), I figured I should see what other users think about the idea. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 17:02, July 4, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :Hmm...I do agree, it was an absurdly written review, but I think we should keep it. It ''is'' a review after all, and I think removing it entirely is a bad idea. The section about it on the page is only one (albeit lengthy) sentence, and it doesn't mention the glaring error about the number of Figure Skater Peach levels. Also, his statement about the times tables doesn't refer to the error, but that the game would only appeal to ''very'' young children. If readers want to see the whole review, they can follow the reference link. It's a bit of a stretch to say that we should remove the whole section. We should also present two sides of the reviews for a game, as if we only include positive reviews for games, that would be a bit unfair and very biased. It does seem, though, that the reviewer has not played Princess Peach: Showtime enough to understand the game. I know ''I'' enjoyed it, and I thought it was a fine game. I want to see what other users say, though. That's my two cents. -- {{User:FanOfRosalina2007/sig}} 22:50, July 4, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Princess peach showtime is not a platformer ==
| |
|
| |
| Its placed in the other section of platformer mario games, it shouldnt be there [[Special:Contributions/213.233.18.185|213.233.18.185]] 11:21, September 20, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == British English stuff ==
| |
|
| |
| Hey. I just came here after seeing one of [[User:PaperSplash|PaperSplash]]'s edits. In their edit they said that even though the NoA English script is also used by NoE it’s put on separate en_US and en_GB language files in different folders, so they added English (United Kingdom). I just removed that one if the script is just the same for both, but then thought of bringing it back. The only problem is I can’t put a not after “en_gb=y” explaining that. I tried what I could, but the note still wouldn’t show up. How do I put a note/reference after a language, or is that just not possible? [[User:CarlosYoshiBoi|CarlosYoshiBoi]] ([[User talk:CarlosYoshiBoi|talk]]) 19:03, February 3, 2025 (PST)
| |