Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{no forum talk}} | | {{Notforumtalk}} |
|
| |
|
| ==Possible Cowgirl Peach...?== | | ==Possible Cowgirl Peach...?== |
Line 86: |
Line 86: |
|
| |
|
| Can we add a alphabet for the in game ancient language [[Special:Contributions/174.242.40.57|174.242.40.57]] 12:45, April 6, 2024 (EDT) | | Can we add a alphabet for the in game ancient language [[Special:Contributions/174.242.40.57|174.242.40.57]] 12:45, April 6, 2024 (EDT) |
| :Presuming it's about the stone exhibitions in [[The Case of the Missing Mural]], I personally think it'd be impractical at best, even more so as there's no sounds associated with those letters. Same unfortunately goes for what is apparently the [[Theet]]s' current-day written language, which is used in e.g. the newspaper Peach reads in [[The Case of the Rainy-Day Plot]], and in some of Sparkle Theater's posters. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 11:14, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Replace the level list on the main Princess Peach: Showtime! page with a link to, or incorporation of, the Sparkle Theater page== | | ==Replace the level list on the main Princess Peach: Showtime! page with a link to, or incorporation of, the Sparkle Theater page== |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | {{TPP}} |
| {{Proposal outcome|failed|0-6}}
| |
| The edit in question would be big enough that it'd likely raise eyebrows if I had done it with no forewarning, so it likely warrants a talk page proposal instead: | | The edit in question would be big enough that it'd likely raise eyebrows if I had done it with no forewarning, so it likely warrants a talk page proposal instead: |
|
| |
|
Line 100: |
Line 98: |
|
| |
|
| ===Option 1: Replace the entire Showtime page's list with a link to Sparkle Theater=== | | ===Option 1: Replace the entire Showtime page's list with a link to Sparkle Theater=== |
| This is one I know from Wikipedia, which has a concept of "Main article:". The way I think of it, the entire "Plays" section would be replaced with a "Main article:", for example, if I remember Wikipedia's syntaxing correctly: | | This is one I know from Wikipedia, which has a concept of "Main page:". The way I think of it, the entire "Plays" section would be replaced with a "Main article:", for example, if I remember Wikipedia's syntaxing correctly: |
| <code><nowiki>==Plays==</nowiki></code><br> | | <code><nowiki>==Plays==</nowiki></code><br> |
| <code><nowiki>{{Main|Sparkle Theater}}</nowiki></code><br><br> | | <code><nowiki>{{Main|Sparkle Theater}}</nowiki></code><br><br> |
Line 115: |
Line 113: |
|
| |
|
| ====Oppose==== | | ====Oppose==== |
| #{{User|Nightwicked Bowser}} Game articles typically include full level lists regardless if there are other articles that list them, including all Super Mario platformer articles.
| |
| #{{User|ExoRosalina}} Is this even necessary? Some plays have better options just like in other platformer pages. I have yet checked Super Mario Galaxy (including 2) have both levels and Galaxy page have those similar issues.
| |
| #{{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} Per above. Also, there is no option choosing.
| |
| #{{User|Power Flotzo}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|FanOfRosalina2007}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|EvieMaybe}} if this passed, would we also take the levels out of SM3DW's page and put them in the sprixie kingdom page?
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Comments==== | | ====Comments==== |
| Uhhh, this proposal doesn't let you choose which option they want. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 08:15, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :I had to guess a fair bit for what the format for my first ever talk page proposal would be, and [[MarioWiki:Proposals#Basic_proposal_and_support.2Foppose_format]] didn't seem to account for multi-option procedures, sadly. 😓 [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 11:09, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::You don't have to keep the format as provided on the Proposals page word-for-word: you can change a few things that befit your proposal better as you set it up. Looking at previous multiple-option proposals, for example, you can replace the Support and Oppose sections with an "Option 1" section, an "Option 2" section, and a "Do nothing" section. {{User:Arend/sig}} 12:07, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::Yeah, you don't HAVE to. When I make multi-option proposals, I put in the initial format, then change it to fit the proposal. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 13:49, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == A Grape Error ==
| |
|
| |
| The link to the Grape (character) article in the description for the Sour Bunch erroneously leads to the article for grapes (the item / food)
| |
| [[User:Breather|Breather]] ([[User talk:Breather|talk]]) 17:19, June 27, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :This has been taken care of. Thanks for noticing! -- {{User:FanOfRosalina2007/sig}} 19:22, July 3, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==Would the mentions of The Guardian's baffling review be considered okay to remove?==
| |
| After I googled "times tables" with an S and saw it referred to multiplication tables, the already horrendously written review by them became outright fraudulent in my eyes. The reviewer thought there were only two [[Figure Skater Peach]] stages in the game (Anyone who've played 90min of the game can tell there's three), and goes absurdly far to equate female-styled games with toddler shovelware as if he hadn't played any games with female leads since 2011 Wii games. At this point I have my doubts as to whether he even played the game.<br><br>Accordingly, I feel a large part of the Reception section could or even should be removed, but since even extremely negative reviews have stayed up on other pages ([[Mario Party]], [[Mario Party Advance]]), I figured I should see what other users think about the idea. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 17:02, July 4, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :Hmm...I do agree, it was an absurdly written review, but I think we should keep it. It ''is'' a review after all, and I think removing it entirely is a bad idea. The section about it on the page is only one (albeit lengthy) sentence, and it doesn't mention the glaring error about the number of Figure Skater Peach levels. Also, his statement about the times tables doesn't refer to the error, but that the game would only appeal to ''very'' young children. If readers want to see the whole review, they can follow the reference link. It's a bit of a stretch to say that we should remove the whole section. We should also present two sides of the reviews for a game, as if we only include positive reviews for games, that would be a bit unfair and very biased. It does seem, though, that the reviewer has not played Princess Peach: Showtime enough to understand the game. I know ''I'' enjoyed it, and I thought it was a fine game. I want to see what other users say, though. That's my two cents. -- {{User:FanOfRosalina2007/sig}} 22:50, July 4, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Princess peach showtime is not a platformer ==
| |
|
| |
| Its placed in the other section of platformer mario games, it shouldnt be there [[Special:Contributions/213.233.18.185|213.233.18.185]] 11:21, September 20, 2024 (EDT)
| |